Ismail R. al-Faruqi

Ismail R. al-Faruqi’s Followers (60)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Ismail R. al-Faruqi


Born
in Jaffa, Palestinian Territory, Occupied
January 01, 1921

Died
May 27, 1986

Website

Genre


Isma'il Raji al-Faruqi (January 1, 1921 – May 27, 1986) was a Palestinian-American philosopher, widely recognised by his peers as an authority on Islam and comparative religion. He spent several years at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, then taught at several universities in North America, including McGill University in Montreal. He was Professor of Religion at Temple University, where he founded and chaired the Islamic Studies program. Dr. al-Faruqi was also the founder of the International Institute of Islamic Thought. He wrote over 100 articles for various scholarly journals and magazines in addition to 25 books, of the most notable being Christian Ethics: A Historical and Systematic Analysis of Its Dominant Ideas. He also established the I ...more

Average rating: 4.03 · 726 ratings · 156 reviews · 26 distinct worksSimilar authors
التوحيد: مضامينه على الفكر ...

by
4.06 avg rating — 396 ratings — published 1992 — 12 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
أسلمة المعرفة: المبادئ العا...

by
3.98 avg rating — 114 ratings — published 1982 — 7 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
أطلس الحضارة الإسلامية

by
3.88 avg rating — 75 ratings — published 1419 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Islam and the Problem of Is...

4.22 avg rating — 23 ratings — published 2003 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
صياغة العلوم الاجتماعية صيا...

by
3.30 avg rating — 20 ratings — published 1989 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Historical Atlas of the Rel...

by
4.20 avg rating — 10 ratings — published 1974 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Islam

3.70 avg rating — 10 ratings — published 1994 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Islam and Other Faiths (Isl...

by
4.38 avg rating — 8 ratings — published 1998 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Trialogue of the Abrahamic ...

4.43 avg rating — 7 ratings — published 1989 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Toward Islamic English (Isl...

3.86 avg rating — 7 ratings — published 1988 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Ismail R. al-Faruqi…
Quotes by Ismail R. al-Faruqi  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Whereas Jesus demanded of the Jews the rejection of the tribalist Jahweh whom they identified with Israel, the race, the community the political state as object of worship and desire, the Sufis, born in an atmosphere of pure monotheism, demanded what Jesus of the first century A.D. would demand if he were to relive his early life again in present-day monotheistic Christendom. This does not mean that Jesus did not demand, like the Sufis, the cleansing of the soul from the personal deities it may worship besides God, but it does mean that the main weight of his teaching centered around the Jewish preoccupation with the tribe as God."
"The object and deal of Sufism is, therefore, identically the same as that of the radical self-transformation of Jesus. Both aimed at the state of consciousness in which God is the sole subject, the sole determiner and the sole object of love and devotion. The tradition of both later influenced each other and succeeded in developing the same kind of preparatory disciplines leading towards the end. Finally, both referred to the final end of these processes as 'oneness' and their reference was in each case exposed to the same dangers of misunderstanding, indeed to the same misunderstanding. The oneness of Jesus was misunderstood as unity and fusion of being, and thus gave rise to the greatest materialization of an essentially spiritual union history has ever seen. The oneness of the highest Sufi state was likewise misunderstood and gave rise to the worst crime perpetrated on account of a supremely conscious misunderstanding...The destinies of the two misunderstandings, however, were far apart. The Christian misunderstanding came to dominate the Christendom; the Muslim misunderstanding performed its bloody deed and sank away in front of the Sufi tide which overwhelmed the Muslim world. The success of Sufism in Islam was therefore the success of the Jesus' ethic, but devoid of the theological superstructures which this Christian misunderstanding had constructed concerning the oneness of Christ with God, or of men with Christ. In the Middle Ages, the intellectual disciples of Jesus were the sufis of Islam, rather than the theologians of the Council or Pope-monarchs of Christendom.”
Ismail Ragi A.al Faruqi

“..Jesus was not to recapture for the Jewish vacuous ethos, the original value of the community on which it had wagered its whole life and weight. Rightly diagnosing Jewry's disease, he rejected not only their failure to comply with their ethic but the very foundation of that ethic. Piercing the walls of community survival, Jesus opened a whole new vista of genuine, properly ethical values, namely, the values of the individual person. The value of the community, no matter how 'surviving' and prosperous it may be or become, Jesus found inferior to that of the individual person. It is the latter that the community must serve. In respect to it, the value of the community can be only instrumental. The value of the individual person, the values which pertain to his inner self, are far more important than those which attach to community survival. For, what is the worth of the whole world and all mankind if the individual souls that compose it are ethically sick, if they do not realize the values of purity, of chastity, of sincerity, of charity, of forgiveness, of loving kindness and goodness? The ethical individual person is the end of moral life itself. How can community survival have anything but elemental worth? Even on this level of instruments and means, how can it have the first position? Are not the conditions of life and existence , which readily conduce to the cultivation of the moral person, of greater importance and therefore, of higher value? Would not the family with its ultimate self-sacrifice and love-cultivating atmosphere prove of higher worth than the community where everything must be impersonalized ,legalized, and exteriorized? Pursuing this same insight further, would not even solitude rank higher than community, where the person can turn his eyes inward and , as it were, focus attention on what his self actually is , on what it ought to be which it is not, and on bringing that self around to become that which it ought to be?”
Ismail Ragi A.al Faruqi

Topics Mentioning This Author

topics posts views last activity  
Challenge: 50 Books: JB's Challenge List for 2015 127 159 Dec 31, 2015 06:16PM  
Non Fiction Book ...: * Non-Fiction Book You Are Currently Reading or Just Finished ~ 2017 537 304 Feb 01, 2018 11:50AM