Stephen Skowronek

Stephen Skowronek’s Followers (13)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Stephen Skowronek


Website


Stephen Skowronek is the Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political and Social Science at Yale University.

Average rating: 3.87 · 395 ratings · 32 reviews · 20 distinct worksSimilar authors
The Politics Presidents Mak...

3.89 avg rating — 166 ratings — published 1993 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Presidential Leadership in ...

3.96 avg rating — 98 ratings — published 2008 — 14 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Building a New American Sta...

3.76 avg rating — 55 ratings — published 1982 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Phantoms of a Beleaguered R...

by
4.04 avg rating — 23 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Presidential Leadership in ...

4.14 avg rating — 7 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Formative Acts: American Po...

by
really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 2007 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Progressives' Century: ...

by
liked it 3.00 avg rating — 2 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Presidential Leadership in ...

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Adaptability Paradox: P...

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
THE REASSOCIATION OF IDEAS ...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Stephen Skowronek…
Quotes by Stephen Skowronek  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“In the incongruous role of the insurgent party-builder, he made crystal clear the whole host of inferences we have drawn from the experiences of Monroe and Polk: that innovation, however orthodox, is inherently destabilizing; that the purely constructive leadership project is an illusion; that the affiliated leader cannot assume independent ground without ultimately embracing the role of the heretic; that the only way ever to be president in your own right is to become yourself a great repudiator and set yourself directly against the bulwark of received power; that political disruption parallels presidential significance. Roosevelt's insight was not simply that new achievements do not rest securely on old foundations, but that to save the handiwork of his presidency he would have to reconstruct its political base.”
Stephen Skowronek, The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton

“Carter had diagnosed a political regime in deep trouble, one that would have to alter radically the way it worked in order to meet the problems of the day. Yet, he came to power to rejuvenate that regime rather than repudiate it, to save it rather than destroy it. As the order-affirming and order-shattering dimensions of this project had virtually the same referents, Carter convened a politics in which he could not win for winning. To make his critique credible, he would have to offer potent prescriptions for changing the way government did business. But the more potent his prescriptions, the harder he would have to fight his ostensible allies to secure them; and the harder he had to fight to administer his remedies, the more elusive his case for the vitality of the regime would become. Earnest in the pursuit of his objectives, he could not but drive the disjunction between the regime and the nation beyond repair. The very relationship that Carter sought to carry on with the political establishment served to magnify the problems he had ostensibly come to Washington to resolve.”
Stephen Skowronek, The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton

“If Jefferson's leadership is to be set apart from others similarly situated later on, it should not be because he was inclined to finesse a frontal assault on the old [Federalist] governmental establishment, but because he transformed national politics so thoroughly without being forced into any make-or-break confrontation with it. Jefferson pursued the reconstruction of American government and politics relentlessly, and the regime he created in the end was profoundly different from the one he displaced. Yet, the most remarkable aspect of his transformation is how little resistance he encountered in the process from the institutions and interests previously attached to the old order. Jefferson's authority to reconstruct proved singularly disarming and all-encompassing.”
Stephen Skowronek, The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton

Topics Mentioning This Author

topics posts views last activity  
The History Book ...: THOMAS JEFFERSON: THE ART OF POWER - BIBLIOGRAPHY ~ (SPOILER THREAD) 38 119 Mar 05, 2013 08:12AM  


Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Stephen to Goodreads.