S. Fred Singer
![]() |
Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate
by
14 editions
—
published
1997
—
|
|
![]() |
Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years
by
15 editions
—
published
2006
—
|
|
![]() |
NIPCC vs. IPCC: Addressing the Disparity between Climate Models and Observations: Testing the Hypothesis of Anthropogenic Global Warming
2 editions
—
published
2011
—
|
|
![]() |
Global Effects of Environmental Pollution: A Symposium
—
published
1970
|
|
![]() |
Global Climate Change: Human and Natural Influences
3 editions
—
published
1989
—
|
|
![]() |
Ocean in Human Affairs
2 editions
—
published
1990
—
|
|
![]() |
Falsche Klimaprognosen: Langzeitbeobachtungen des Klimas und Klimamodelle des IPCC im Vergleich
by |
|
![]() |
Free Market Energy: The Way to Benefit Consumers
4 editions
—
published
1984
—
|
|
![]() |
Energy: Readings from Scientific American
3 editions
—
published
1979
—
|
|
![]() |
The artificial earth satellite: Past, present and future
|
|
“Contrary to some accounts of the history of the scientific debate, there was no gradually emerging “consensus” on the human role in climate change. Rather, politics quickly overtook science as environmental advocates and other interest groups recognized the utility of the climate change issue in advancing their own agendas.”
― Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate
― Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate
“In conclusion, the IPCC misled an entire generation of scientists and policy-makers, telling them the human impact on the Earth’s climate poses a genuine threat to human well-being and other life on the planet while deliberately and repeatedly hiding uncertainty, the absence of critical data, and evidence that questions or contradicts its apocalyptic prediction. Many thoughtful and well-intended people accept the IPCC’s claims unconditionally, taking at face value its claim to represent the “consensus of scientists.” They were betrayed. The result is a terrible crime against science, the adoption of unnecessary and very costly public policies, and grave damage to the reputation and credibility of science.”
― Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate
― Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate
“So, what does science really tell us about climate change? It’s very different from what one might read in, say, the New York Times or even, sadly, in editorials in Nature and other once-prestigious science journals. We know climate change is a permanent feature of planet Earth; any human impact that might be occurring is probably too small to discern against a background of natural variability; and CO2, so often blamed for changing the weather, is almost surely a minor player compared to natural processes. Despite all the hot talk, there is no “climate crisis” resulting from human activities and no such thing on the horizon.”
― Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate
― Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite S. to Goodreads.