S. Fred Singer

S. Fred Singer’s Followers (8)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

S. Fred Singer



Average rating: 4.22 · 572 ratings · 60 reviews · 37 distinct worksSimilar authors
Hot Talk, Cold Science: Glo...

by
4.38 avg rating — 197 ratings — published 1997 — 14 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Unstoppable Global Warming:...

by
4.08 avg rating — 204 ratings — published 2006 — 15 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
NIPCC vs. IPCC: Addressing ...

3.75 avg rating — 4 ratings — published 2011 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Global Effects of Environme...

3.67 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1970
Rate this book
Clear rating
Global Climate Change: Huma...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1989 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Ocean in Human Affairs

2.67 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1990 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Falsche Klimaprognosen: Lan...

by
liked it 3.00 avg rating — 2 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Free Market Energy: The Way...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 1984 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Energy: Readings from Scien...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 1979 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The artificial earth satell...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by S. Fred Singer…
Quotes by S. Fred Singer  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Contrary to some accounts of the history of the scientific debate, there was no gradually emerging “consensus” on the human role in climate change. Rather, politics quickly overtook science as environmental advocates and other interest groups recognized the utility of the climate change issue in advancing their own agendas.”
S. Fred Singer, Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate

“In conclusion, the IPCC misled an entire generation of scientists and policy-makers, telling them the human impact on the Earth’s climate poses a genuine threat to human well-being and other life on the planet while deliberately and repeatedly hiding uncertainty, the absence of critical data, and evidence that questions or contradicts its apocalyptic prediction. Many thoughtful and well-intended people accept the IPCC’s claims unconditionally, taking at face value its claim to represent the “consensus of scientists.” They were betrayed. The result is a terrible crime against science, the adoption of unnecessary and very costly public policies, and grave damage to the reputation and credibility of science.”
S. Fred Singer, Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate

“So, what does science really tell us about climate change? It’s very different from what one might read in, say, the New York Times or even, sadly, in editorials in Nature and other once-prestigious science journals. We know climate change is a permanent feature of planet Earth; any human impact that might be occurring is probably too small to discern against a background of natural variability; and CO2, so often blamed for changing the weather, is almost surely a minor player compared to natural processes. Despite all the hot talk, there is no “climate crisis” resulting from human activities and no such thing on the horizon.”
S. Fred Singer, Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite S. to Goodreads.