FOR WRITERS: WHAT I WISH I'D KNOWN

As a writer looking back on a long career – forty years, fifty-some books and counting – I have, as might be expected, hindsights. There are things I wish somebody had told me. So I’m telling you.

Back when I was first trying to get started, I wish I’d known I had the right to write. I was paralyzed until I decided to write fantasy so nobody could call me out. Maybe things are better now that female authors are studied in schools, girls have opportunities, etc. But I bet there are still young people out there who want to write but feel they lack any authority because they haven’t been abused or slept under bridges or lived with wolves or whatever. Hear ye, everyday persons: Just being human is enough. Just experiencing life in this world is enough. Let your eyes see, let your mind roam free, and write.

Another thing I wish I’d known: Form needs to come before technique. I learned this at an art show with a knowledgeable friend. We were looking at somebody’s pen-and-ink rendition of a very faulty nude, lovingly shaded. “Nice stippling,” she remarked, “but form needs to come before technique.” The artist had not mastered the structure of the human body before oozing technique all over it. Same here. Writing my first novel, I tried to imitate T.H. White’s use of anachronism. I would have done better to structure my story. To this day, I love experimenting with unusual viewpoints like, say, second person plural. I love to texture my prose by changing fonts. I love all the gimmicks: epistolary novel, or novel told in journal, or as e-mail, or by the dog. But before indulging in any such shenanigans, I must make sure I have a story structure: character, conflict, crisis, conclusion.

The next thing is milk it, and one of my early editors taught me that, though not in those words. He chose certain portions of the book (it was THE WHITE HART) and instructed me to lengthen them. The idea was to make the emotional high points of the book last longer for the reader, he told me. In brief, milk it. On another occasion he complimented me on my good pacing. What is pacing, I wanted to know? After a speechless moment of surprise that I had no idea what I was doing, he told me it was a matter of sensing how long to linger with a scene – say, dialogue -- before moving on to a different, maybe action scene. In other words, how long to milk it.

Yet another thing I wish I’d understood is the importance of a good idea. Somehow, maybe from being an English Literature major in college, I had glommed onto the notion that ideas were no big deal, that I could make any idea sparkle by the brilliance of my writing. Wrong. Those people who ask where you get your ideas are not clueless; it’s a legitimate question. A writer should know where s/he gets ideas; should know, for instance, how to turn a vague premise into a valid story idea. How two or more premises have to combine; if you have the metaphor, you have the story. (Ray Bradbury.) How to tell the difference between a good idea and a brain burp: one comes from the heart, the other from the head. Heartfelt ideas are usually winners, brain burps usually losers. Where do you get your ideas?

It took me a long time to find out the thing I’m going to tell you next: Editors and agents are very likely as confused as you are. They, like the writers you look up to, are floundering just as you are floundering, only at a slightly higher level. More often than not, revision letters give bad advice, but they do serve to tell the author where the problem areas are. I have encountered very few editors who are truly stupid, but also very few who really understand the writing process. So fix the manuscript your own way. Just make sure not to violate the integrity of the book. As for agents – overall, my agents have done tremendously well for me, but sometimes they drop the ball. So writers need to pay attention, because no agent or editor, however well intentioned, is as interested in the writer’s career as the writer is. Plus, these people are not one size fits all. Editors and agents have different ideas of good writing. For one editor, I include lots of “sense of place,” meaning description. For another, I pare the story to the bone. Both editors acquire books that sell sometimes, or not. Both are probably totally confused about the marketplace right now, and so, I dare say, is my very good agent, and so am I.

The last thing I’m going to tell you falls under the category of life conditions of which people say, “It is what it is.” Here’s the clincher: in my experience, sometime along the way, after you master the fundamentals of being a fiction writer, and after you achieve publication, you will reach a point where you find that you are on your own. You’re asking questions for which you can’t find the answers. You speak your needs but people do not understand them. At least that’s been my experience. About the same time I discovered I couldn’t always listen to editors or agents, I realized that other writers couldn’t necessarily give me good advice either. I wanted a group of writing chums like the Inklings, but I found I was on my own. Yet there’s a rather lovely paradox here: because my advice to you would be “Don’t necessarily take anybody’s advice, including mine,” then what I’ve just said may not be true for you. And if “it is what it is” isn’t, wow! Just wow.

Maybe that’s the last thing I should tell you: that “it is what it is” isn’t always.
4 likes ·   •  11 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 25, 2015 08:22
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Teanna (new)

Teanna Byerts Brainfarts. I remember it as brainfarts, and I still love this word.

Please write more of these, great insights from someone whose made storytelling a resounding success (even if Pixar hasn't done your film yet...).


message 2: by Reni (new)

Reni Fulton I took a class from you twenty years ago and I still think it was the best class I ever took in novel writing. Now that I am retired I actually dug out a notebook with the notes from that class and am using them to revise a book I am writing. Thanks to Teanna Byerts for turning me on to your blog. will go back to reread all your posts. Happy to refind you...although I know you were never lost.


message 3: by Teanna (new)

Teanna Byerts All these great people I knew here have gone to the Blessed Realm: Florida.

Nanc, may your life be ever free of sinkholes.


message 4: by Nancy (new)

Nancy Springer Teanna wrote: "Brainfarts. I remember it as brainfarts, and I still love this word.

Please write more of these, great insights from someone whose made storytelling a resounding success (even if Pixar hasn't done..."


Teanna, remember the time you accumulated a whole bunch of chrysanthemum heads and hung them from the ceiling of my upstairs room via fishnet? Flowers growing upside down on the ceiling. Now that was a brain...fart.


message 5: by Nancy (new)

Nancy Springer Reni wrote: "I took a class from you twenty years ago and I still think it was the best class I ever took in novel writing. Now that I am retired I actually dug out a notebook with the notes from that class a..."

Reni, thank you for the kind thoughts and the compliment! I wish I were still teaching those classes. I really enjoyed them, and by teaching others I also taught myself a few things. Write on!


message 6: by Richard (last edited Feb 25, 2015 02:13PM) (new)

Richard Nice posting...! Thanks.

haven't ... lived with wolves...
Heh heh... Glad to know that's no longer a requirement. ;-)


message 7: by Nancy (new)

Nancy Springer Richard wrote: "Nice posting...! Thanks.

haven't ... lived with wolves...
Heh heh... Glad to know that's no longer a requirement. ;-)"


Thank you for reading my post, Richard. No, I haven't lived with wolves either. :)


message 8: by Teanna (new)

Teanna Byerts Ah yes, I remember the chrysanthemums! Now I work at a place that sells high tech gadgets to dry those things...

I do live with wolves... or as close as it is sensible to do so in civilization. Technically Siberian huskies are domesticated... technically...


message 9: by Nancy (new)

Nancy Springer Teanna wrote: "Ah yes, I remember the chrysanthemums! Now I work at a place that sells high tech gadgets to dry those things...

I do live with wolves... or as close as it is sensible to do so in civilization. Te..."


"Living with wolves" can be taken metaphorically....


message 10: by Thomas (new)

Thomas Bruso Beautifully stated. At the moment, I have an editor who seems to be on the same page as me. She cares about my work. I am lucky and blessed. I think every writer needs a different set of eyes for their work. We do not see the flaws in our own manuscripts.

You are right, publishing is in a state of flux. I find the process confusing and mysterious. But I hold my own, keep writing, and solider on because somehow it is both mesmerizing and highly addictive.

Thanks again for writing this insightful post, Nancy. I love your work.


message 11: by Nancy (new)

Nancy Springer Thomas wrote: "Beautifully stated. At the moment, I have an editor who seems to be on the same page as me. She cares about my work. I am lucky and blessed. I think every writer needs a different set of eyes for t..."

Thank you, Thomas! You are so right about the addictive aspect of writing and publishing, much like that of gambling. And you're very right to value your good editor. I learned to write not in creative writing classes but from editors and agents who coached me. They taught me all the basics and then some until I could thrash around on my own. "Soldier on" is a good term for it. Thank you for loving the struggle, Thomas.


back to top

Last Seen Wandering Vaguely

Nancy Springer
Befuddlements of a professional fiction writer
Follow Nancy Springer's blog with rss.