What do you think?
Rate this book
196 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1913
⭐️⭐️⭐️☆☆ (3/5)
The Book of Lies (published in 1913) is one of Aleister Crowley’s most enigmatic, cryptic, and poetic works — a whirlwind of mystical symbolism, Qabalistic riddles, and occult philosophy. At first glance, it appears to be a chaotic series of short prose-poems, but beneath its surface lies a densely packed structure rooted in esoteric traditions, particularly Thelema, Hermeticism, and Crowley’s interpretation of the Qabalah.
Each chapter (or “lie”) is a standalone verse accompanied by a paradoxical or philosophical commentary. The 93 chapters — a number deeply significant in Thelemic philosophy — collectively weave a text that is part spiritual revelation, part cosmic joke, and part intellectual provocation.
The book is formatted into 93 chapters, most no longer than a single page, with titles as cryptic as the contents: “The Oyster,” “Pilgrim-Talk,” “The Gun-Barrel,” “The Hemispheres of Magick,” and “The Chinese Music.” The brevity of each entry is misleading; every chapter is laden with occult references, obscure jokes, and deliberate contradictions, requiring the reader to return repeatedly for deeper understanding.
The themes throughout the work oscillate between mysticism and nihilism, sacred truth and sardonic irreverence. This interplay of duality mirrors many traditions Crowley drew from — especially Taoism, Hermeticism, and Eastern philosophies — often landing on the conclusion that truth is inexpressible and fluid.
Crowley, the self-proclaimed “Great Beast 666,” used The Book of Lies not only to veil esoteric wisdom but also to initiate readers into new understandings through confusion and revelation. This aligns with his general approach to occultism — that truth lies beyond the rational and must be approached through both discipline and disruption.
The style is as audacious as Crowley himself. He mixes prose with poetry, satire with sanctity, and dogma with blasphemy. The contradictions are not flaws, but purposeful smokescreens intended to stimulate awakening or gnosis. His footnotes and commentaries are frequently as cryptic as the main text, and often mischievous, full of false leads, personal symbols, and paradoxes.
When compared with the occult works of Crowley's time — such as A.E. Waite’s The Holy Kabbalah or Israel Regardie’s more systematic The Tree of Life — The Book of Lies stands out for its deliberate obscurity and poetic boldness. While Waite and Regardie focus on structured exposition and logical sequence, Crowley plunges into chaotic mysticism, mirroring the non-linear journey of the initiate.
Compared to Crowley’s own The Book of the Law, The Book of Lies is less prophetic but more exploratory. It doesn't deliver edicts; it dismantles assumptions. Where The Book of the Law is declarative, The Book of Lies is interrogative.
It also bears comparison to G.I. Gurdjieff’s later work Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson — another difficult, symbolism-rich text meant to disrupt rational mindsets and force deeper contemplation. But where Gurdjieff can be laborious, Crowley is sharp and biting, often hilarious in his blasphemy.
The Book of Lies is a masterpiece of mystical literature — but not in the conventional sense. It is an anti-book, an anti-dogma scripture, designed to challenge readers, especially initiates, into peeling back the layers of their own assumptions. Crowley’s wit, irreverence, and devotion to subverting linear thought make this a landmark of esoteric writing.
However, it is not a beginner’s guide. For the uninitiated, it might appear as incomprehensible nonsense. For the adept or the patient, it is a labyrinth of symbols and secrets, many of which cannot be explained — only experienced.
“The way out is through the door. Why is it that no one will use this method?” — Chapter 22, The Book of Lies
Final Verdict:
⭐️⭐️⭐️☆☆ — A dazzling, confounding, essential gem for the esoterically inclined. Not for the faint of heart or the lazy of mind.