The economic boom of the 1990s created huge wealth for the bosses, but benefited workers hardly at all. At the same time, the bosses were able to take the political initiative and even the moral high ground, while workers were often divided against each other. This new book by leading labor analyst Michael D. Yates seeks to explain how this happened, and what can be done about it.Essential to both tasks is "naming the system"the system that ensures that those who do the work do not benefit from the wealth they produce. Yates draws on recent data to show that the growing inequalityglobally, and within the United Statesis a necessary consequence of capitalism, and not an unfortunate side-effect that can be remedied by technical measures. To defend working people against ongoing attackson their working conditions, their living standards, and their future and that of their childrenand to challenge inequality, it is necessary to understand capitalism as a system and for labor to challenge the political dominance of capitalist interests.Naming the System examines contemporary trends in employment and unemployment, in hours of work, and in the nature of jobs. It shows how working life is being reconfigured today, and how the effects of this are masked by mainstream economic theories. It uses numerous concrete examples to relate larger theoretical issues to everyday experience of the present-day economy. And it sets out the strategic options for organized labor in the current political context, in which the U.S.-led war on terrorism threatens to eclipse the anti-globalization movement.
The best introductory overview of economics and capitalism from a left perspective that I've encountered. Yates systematically deconstructs libertarian and neoliberal economic thought, and then sets forth the "radical economic" counterargument in a highly readable and lucid manner.
The only con was his insistence on defending the "socialist" states of the 20th century-spare me.
A readable introduction to political economy from a Marxist perspective. The chapter on neoliberalism are very helpful. The chapters on the Marxist perspective do not address issues like the controversy over the falling rate of profit, or the controversies surrounding central planning. However, this is still a decent introductory book, which can serve as a counterweight to most neoclassical economics textbooks, and attempted gussying-up/rebranding thereof (hello, Freakonomics!)
A lucid exposition of ridiculous ideas. My favorite part is the discussion of the Cultural Revolution: "Excesses occured, but in the end they were not the main problem." The fact that to Professor Yates, that whole "the government killed a whole bunch of people" thing isn't that big a deal, should tell you what you need to know about this book.
With that said, there's a lot wrong with capitalism as we currently practice it and this book is very clearly written.
This is a fantastic introduction to "radical" economic theory. I am very fortunate to have had a college instructor who would recommend it, and the reasons why few would recommend a book like this are covered in the book.
The best book on economics I have ever read! Yates dispels the myths of neo-liberalism. Paying people more will not cause the economy to collapse, and extreme income inequality obviously leads to instability.