A biography of Conan Doyle, best known for his creation of Sherlock Holmes. He was more than a populist writer and a symbol of triumphalism of Edwardian England. He was also an ambitious man of letters, a searcher for political and theological truth, and a leader and shaper of opinion.
Michael Coren is an English-Canadian columnist, author, public speaker, radio host and television talk show host. He has been the host of the television series The Michael Coren Show for six years. He has also been a long-time radio personality, particularly on CFRB radio.
He has writen more than ten books, including biographies of H. G. Wells, Arthur Conan Doyle, and C. S. Lewis. His latest book, Why Catholics are Right, will be published in 2011.
This does everything a biography should do – it describes the life and work of its subject. Clearly and accessibly written, well-researched, balanced and fair. But, as another Goodreads reviewer puts it, it’s no more than serviceable. It’s a curiously flat account of a very interesting man and I never felt that I was really getting to know Conan Doyle in any meaningful way. For me personally, there was also too much detail about the Sherlock Holmes stories (as well as too many spoilers). If I want to know the plots, then I can read them for myself. And I also found the lengthy expositions about Conan Doyle’s spiritualist activities rather tedious. All in all, adequate but uninspiring.
A pleasant and short book on the famous writer. It is nice that the author focuses on other aspects of Conan Doyle’s life besides the Sherlock Holmes detective.
Conan Doyle had a prodigious output – several works of fiction and letters to various newspapers. His obsession with spiritualism included much travel and speaking engagements. But it is in Holmes’ that one finds the best of Arthur Conan Doyle – after all, who doesn’t like a good detective story or murder mystery? The Sherlock Holmes stories definitely occupy a memorable place in this genre. The stories are wonderful, concise and as Conan Doyle himself pointed out they are well-wrapped and self-contained. You may read one, or one hundred, and appreciate the mystery!
Also in this biography the decency of the man comes out. He worked hard, cared for his family and did not let fame get to his head – so unfortunately there are no hedonistic descriptions of opulent wealth or multiple affairs with young women in this biography.
There were one or two interesting moments in this book..... which for me were less than enough. I didn't feel l was given any insights into the man's true mental state yet most of what is normally covered in biographies was present. I guess it all depends on what material is available and l was not so intetested in his stories, more his curious delusion, which while covered, was not done with much true energy. More on his friendship with Houdini would've been interesting.
I thought this started rather slowly and I thought it might be boring but as I went along I found I was learning some very interesting things about Conan Doyle. By the end I felt I had learned a lot of useful information. I was a Holmes afficionado but knew next to nothing of his spiritualism. It's amazing to see him arm in arm with Houdini.
After recently reading The Witch of Lime Street: Séance, Seduction, and Houdini in the Spirit World, I wanted to read a little more about Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. This biography seemed to fit the bill--it wasn’t too long and author Michael Coren said in his introduction that his book was a “biographical study”, not “an orthodox literary biography”. That suited me, since I was most interested in reading about Sir Arthur’s personal life and his interest in spiritualism. This book did indeed have quite a bit about those two topics, but also had quite a bit about Sir Arthur’s mystery books and other writings that were not about spiritualism. That was okay, though, but I did skim most of the parts about Sherlock Holmes.
Mr. Coren also mentioned in the book’s introduction a short video of Sir Arthur made in 1929, where he spends about five minutes talking about Sherlock Holmes and about five minutes discussing spiritualism. You can easily find this video online and watch it. It’s an interesting film, and quite funny when he discusses Sherlock Holmes; because he tells about letters he gets addressed to the great detective, by readers who obviously don’t know they are writing to a fictional character. Many are from women asking Mr. Holmes if he needs a housekeeper.
Back to the book, however . . . Mr. Coren does a good job describing Arthur Conan Doyle’s childhood in Scotland; education, including in a Jesuit school; trips to many countries; family life, both as a child and as an adult; writings, both fiction and nonfiction; speeches on about everything; involvement in political and social issues; interest in all types of sports; years as a doctor, including during the Boar War; intense interest in spiritualism; and final years before his death in the summer of 1930, at the age of 71. There was less in the book about spiritualism than I wanted, but maybe that was for the best. Sir Arthur was such an intelligent and accomplished man, and it seemed so odd he seemed so gullible about certain aspects of spiritualism, such as mediumship and “psychic pictures”, like the fairy ones.
Personally, I think he was concentrating on the wrong metaphysical topic. I think he would have been far better off studying and thinking about reincarnation, instead of trying to talk to the dead. That could have both satisfied his need to believe in the existence of an afterlife, as well as his interest in history, including making sense of the oncoming war he so correctly feared was going to happen. Moreover, just looking at, listening to and reading about Sir Arthur Conan Doyle makes me think there was a man who had lived many times before. A man who had acquired much knowledge and experience during those lifetimes, which is why he was such an accomplished man in his lifetime as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
(Note: I received a free e-copy of this book from NetGalley and the publisher in exchange for an honest review.)
On December 24, 1974, my Uncle Dean gave me a copy of the Complete Sherlock Holmes; I have read the entire book cover to cover twice, many of the complete volumes contained withing several times, and many of the individual stories dozens of times. I'm not a "Sherlockian," but Conan Doyle is the author I have most consistently read for pleasure since the that fateful Christmas day. I found myself, after reading one of his tales over the lunch hour, wanting to know more about the author.
I'd already known a bit--I had spent some time in Portsmouth, where Doyle first started his medical practice and where he first created Holmes, and I'd picked up some detail from that part of his life. And when I've been in London, I've made the pilgrimage to Baker Street, Holmes' residents, more than once.
The book is serviceable; it jibes with what I know of the author's life, it does a good job of framing the man in the context of his age, and one gets a sense of who Doyle was, his relationship to other public figures, and his bravery in taking unpopular stands when he saw a wrong. It also delves into spiritualism, which was, according to Coren, the most important thing in Doyle's life, especially toward the end. If my son had died during war, I imagine I might have been desperate to make contact with him "on the other side." I fervently pray I never have to find out what I would do in such a circumstance.
I found out less about the works themselves than I would have liked, about the way Doyle wrote, influences on stories, and about the creative process. I'm very aware that this might be boring to many people, and that the lack of it might recommend this biography very highly to some.
As I said, if one is interested in Doyle's life, the book is worth reading. I certainly learned more about the man, and I want to read beyond the Holmes stories. But I find myself wanting to read another biography on the topic some time, one that delves more into the author's manner of writing.
I am a huge Sherlock Holmes fan, and I am also curious about books written about Doyle. I would rather have scored this book a 3.5 vs a 4 because nothing big jumped out at me. There are a few items that were new to me. The book was not a waste of my time, and yes I would recommend it to someone who is interested in the true man behind the myth. I would also suggest this bio is appropriate for young adults. On to more work about Holmes or his creator.
The Life of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle by Michael Coren is a good introduction to the man behind Sherlock Holmes. It is a brief biography that is cogent, succinct, accessible, and complete.
The preface states this is not a literary biography, but he does an admirable job covering Doyle's literary achievements from conception to public response. We learn about the men who inspired his characters and how he came to write The Hound of the Baskervilles.
Doyle's life is more adventurous and passionate than one would have supposed. He was a vital man who enjoyed challenging sports. Bored with his medical studies he signed up on a whaling expedition to the Arctic before he'd completed his degree. He had trouble establishing his medical career and tried his hand at writing stories. He discovered a facility in story-telling that was salable. Coren notes Doyle's strengths and weaknesses as an author.
Doyle was a champion of causes. Although a conservative, some of his causes were remarkably forward thinking such as his work toward fair divorce laws for women. He himself never considered divorcing his own wife when he fell in love with another woman; Doyle gave his ailing wife constant and loyal support, marrying the woman he loved after her death. Raised Catholic he later rejected religion but became deeply interested in spiritualism.
It is interesting to learn that in his later life he himself was involved with solving several crime cases.
The biography is a nice introduction to the whole man.
I received a free ebook from the publisher through NetGalley in exchange for a a fair and unbiased review.