What do you think?
Rate this book
Rabindranath Tagore: Universality and Tradition
This collection provides a lucid introduction for those unfamiliar with Tagore's work, while simultaneously presenting importnat new scholarship and novel interpretation. Rabindranath Tagore is considered the greatest modern writer of India. He is also one of the great social and political figures in modern Indian history. After he received the Nobel Prize for literature in 1913, Tagore's reputation in the West has been based primarily on his mystical poetry. But beyond poetry, Tagore wrote novels of social realism, treating nationalism, religious intolerance, and violence. He wrote analytic works on social reform, education, and science- even engaging in a brief dialogue with Albert Einstein. Without ignoring religion and mysticism, the essays in this collection concentrate on this other Tagore. They explicate Tagore's writings in relation to its historical and literary context and, at the same time, draw out those aspects of Tagore's work that continue to bear on contemporary society.
Hardcover
First published May 1, 2003
4 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
August 7, 2025
Today is the 85th Death Anniversary of Tagore
I read Rabindranath Tagore: Universality and Tradition, edited by Patrick Colm Hogan and Lalita Pandit, in the summer of 2009. Swine flu and economic recessions were in the air, but my private quarantine was intellectual.
That year, I found myself returning to Tagore not for his songs or his stories, but for the inconvenient weight of his ideas.
This edited volume was less a coffee-table compilation and more an excavation—of a Tagore simultaneously embedded in tradition and restlessly reaching for the universal.
Published in 2003 by Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, the book is the outcome of a 1998 conference but avoids the usual trappings of overprocessed academic festschrift. Its contributors come from varied disciplinary locations, and the writing, though uneven at times, retains a certain democratic unruliness that echoes Tagore himself. It seeks to show how Tagore cannot be conveniently pinned down—neither by the Orientalist gaze nor by nationalist reverence.
Reading it alongside Subrata Mukherjee’s The Political Ideas of Rabindranath Tagore (which I’d pick up much later, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2022), I was struck by how the two books complement each other like counterpoint in a fugue. Mukherjee’s work is focused, sober, and tightly wound around political theory.
Hogan and Pandit’s edited volume, in contrast, stretches and sprawls. It’s as interested in Tagore’s pedagogical blueprints and aesthetic dilemmas as in his cosmopolitan ethics. Both books are political, but where Mukherjee’s is a clean-lined sketch, this one is more of a mural—busier, messier, but also more alive.
One essay that stayed with me was the one that probed Tagore’s letters to and dialogue with Albert Einstein. These conversations have often been mined to argue that Tagore flirted with idealism or universal humanism as a metaphysical cop-out. But here, the exchange is reread as a philosophical negotiation, not a retreat.
This book insists that Tagore wasn’t merely echoing Kant or Vedanta or the Upanishads; he was confronting modernity's fault lines from a vantage point both inside and outside the frame.
Several essays foreground Tagore’s engagements with social realism—his discomfort with orthodoxy, his critique of blind nationalism, and his insistence on individual ethical cultivation over collective slogans.
The editors’ stated aim, to push past the mystic-poet image and recover the argumentative Tagore, is met with varying degrees of success. William Radice, in his review of this book, called it "exasperating." I’d say that’s a feature, not a bug. Tagore was often infuriating to his contemporaries, too—his refusal to choose sides, to play the prophet, or to chant the right slogans has always irritated neat ideologies.
And yet, there is a certain tenderness that runs through the book’s more literary essays—a recognition of how language, space, and gesture function in Tagore’s fiction, particularly his female characters. These are not merely literary readings but invitations to see how his fiction was also a philosophical field, a testing ground for the ethical-political ideas that appear more explicitly in his essays.
When I compare this book with Rabindranath Tagore in the 21st Century: Theoretical Renewals, edited by Debashish Banerji, which I read in 2023, the difference is generational. Banerji’s anthology engages poststructuralism, posthumanism, and transnational critique with a sharper edge—it speaks the idiom of our theoretical now.
But Universality and Tradition captures the rawness of transition. It is less curated and more contingent, and therein lies its charm. It feels like a bridge—between colonial/postcolonial debates and the globalised theoretical moment we now inhabit.
Looking back, I now see that this book seeded many of my later preoccupations.
My questions about pedagogy, aesthetic autonomy, and political modernity in Indian thought found echoes here. I didn’t agree with every essay, and I winced at some of the more cautious liberal takes.
But the book, like Tagore himself, made space for disagreement without fracture.
In the final analysis, Rabindranath Tagore: Universality and Tradition is less a tribute and more a symposium—a long, uneven, but vital conversation. It reminds us that Tagore’s universality was never abstract, never merely mystical.
It was anchored in particularity, in broken contexts, in histories of violence and dreams of renewal.
It dared to imagine a tradition that did not fossilise and a modernity that did not homogenize. And in doing so, it remains—fifteen years after my first encounter—inflexibly, practically, maddeningly relevant.
I read Rabindranath Tagore: Universality and Tradition, edited by Patrick Colm Hogan and Lalita Pandit, in the summer of 2009. Swine flu and economic recessions were in the air, but my private quarantine was intellectual.
That year, I found myself returning to Tagore not for his songs or his stories, but for the inconvenient weight of his ideas.
This edited volume was less a coffee-table compilation and more an excavation—of a Tagore simultaneously embedded in tradition and restlessly reaching for the universal.
Published in 2003 by Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, the book is the outcome of a 1998 conference but avoids the usual trappings of overprocessed academic festschrift. Its contributors come from varied disciplinary locations, and the writing, though uneven at times, retains a certain democratic unruliness that echoes Tagore himself. It seeks to show how Tagore cannot be conveniently pinned down—neither by the Orientalist gaze nor by nationalist reverence.
Reading it alongside Subrata Mukherjee’s The Political Ideas of Rabindranath Tagore (which I’d pick up much later, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2022), I was struck by how the two books complement each other like counterpoint in a fugue. Mukherjee’s work is focused, sober, and tightly wound around political theory.
Hogan and Pandit’s edited volume, in contrast, stretches and sprawls. It’s as interested in Tagore’s pedagogical blueprints and aesthetic dilemmas as in his cosmopolitan ethics. Both books are political, but where Mukherjee’s is a clean-lined sketch, this one is more of a mural—busier, messier, but also more alive.
One essay that stayed with me was the one that probed Tagore’s letters to and dialogue with Albert Einstein. These conversations have often been mined to argue that Tagore flirted with idealism or universal humanism as a metaphysical cop-out. But here, the exchange is reread as a philosophical negotiation, not a retreat.
This book insists that Tagore wasn’t merely echoing Kant or Vedanta or the Upanishads; he was confronting modernity's fault lines from a vantage point both inside and outside the frame.
Several essays foreground Tagore’s engagements with social realism—his discomfort with orthodoxy, his critique of blind nationalism, and his insistence on individual ethical cultivation over collective slogans.
The editors’ stated aim, to push past the mystic-poet image and recover the argumentative Tagore, is met with varying degrees of success. William Radice, in his review of this book, called it "exasperating." I’d say that’s a feature, not a bug. Tagore was often infuriating to his contemporaries, too—his refusal to choose sides, to play the prophet, or to chant the right slogans has always irritated neat ideologies.
And yet, there is a certain tenderness that runs through the book’s more literary essays—a recognition of how language, space, and gesture function in Tagore’s fiction, particularly his female characters. These are not merely literary readings but invitations to see how his fiction was also a philosophical field, a testing ground for the ethical-political ideas that appear more explicitly in his essays.
When I compare this book with Rabindranath Tagore in the 21st Century: Theoretical Renewals, edited by Debashish Banerji, which I read in 2023, the difference is generational. Banerji’s anthology engages poststructuralism, posthumanism, and transnational critique with a sharper edge—it speaks the idiom of our theoretical now.
But Universality and Tradition captures the rawness of transition. It is less curated and more contingent, and therein lies its charm. It feels like a bridge—between colonial/postcolonial debates and the globalised theoretical moment we now inhabit.
Looking back, I now see that this book seeded many of my later preoccupations.
My questions about pedagogy, aesthetic autonomy, and political modernity in Indian thought found echoes here. I didn’t agree with every essay, and I winced at some of the more cautious liberal takes.
But the book, like Tagore himself, made space for disagreement without fracture.
In the final analysis, Rabindranath Tagore: Universality and Tradition is less a tribute and more a symposium—a long, uneven, but vital conversation. It reminds us that Tagore’s universality was never abstract, never merely mystical.
It was anchored in particularity, in broken contexts, in histories of violence and dreams of renewal.
It dared to imagine a tradition that did not fossilise and a modernity that did not homogenize. And in doing so, it remains—fifteen years after my first encounter—inflexibly, practically, maddeningly relevant.
Displaying 1 of 1 review