Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain

Rate this book
Using scientific standards of organization and analysis, the various aims and techniques of education are examined with the use of sample exercises and exams

207 pages, Paperback

First published June 1, 1956

26 people are currently reading
596 people want to read

About the author

Benjamin S. Bloom

25 books42 followers
Benjamin S. Bloom was an American educational psychologist who has made contributions to the classification of educational objectives and to the theory of mastery-learning.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
39 (42%)
4 stars
26 (28%)
3 stars
14 (15%)
2 stars
8 (8%)
1 star
5 (5%)
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews
Profile Image for Peter Poole.
22 reviews6 followers
June 11, 2012
This is a book that every teacher cites but none have read. If any of them had read it, education would look a lot different today.
Profile Image for Zalee Harris.
16 reviews6 followers
September 28, 2013
I read both Book-1 and Book-2 of Bloom's Taxonomy of Education in 1999. Anyone that studied the education reforms that our schools started implementing back in 1991, you must read these manuscripts. Bloom helps educators create educational objectives and give them direction in the affective domain and cognitive domain. In the wrong hands a teacher knowingly or unknowingly can convert an innocent human child into a gun packing mass killer. If you are responsible for implementing education goals and objectives - you might want to get a copy of these two books. Oh and be prayed up.
8 reviews1 follower
August 4, 2016
I've always disliked "Bloom's Taxonomy"--at least in the format it's commonly presented in. It seemed both too simplistic and too vague to be of use. But I decided to give Bloom a fair chance and see what he (or rather his committee) had to say. It turns out his real taxonomy is clear, carefully thought out, and detailed. And he plainly and repeatedly states what has been my biggest frustration with poor uses of his taxonomy--you cannot identify the level of an objective by looking at the objective (much less the verb) alone.
50 reviews1 follower
February 13, 2024
Easy to read, easily completed in a single day.

Not as boring as expected, actually a pretty good read.
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.