What do you think?
Rate this book
Binding Chaos
Binding Chaos
The world is long overdue for a completely new system of governance.
If there was ever a need for political representation or a paternalistic and opaque authority, it has been removed by technology. Every political system we have tried has proven incapable of protecting human rights and dignity. Every political system we have tried has devolved into oligarchy. To effect the change we require immediately, to give individuals control and responsibility, to bring regional systems under regional governance, allow global collaboration and protect the heritage of future generations, we need a new political model.
If there was ever a need for political representation or a paternalistic and opaque authority, it has been removed by technology. Every political system we have tried has proven incapable of protecting human rights and dignity. Every political system we have tried has devolved into oligarchy. To effect the change we require immediately, to give individuals control and responsibility, to bring regional systems under regional governance, allow global collaboration and protect the heritage of future generations, we need a new political model.
147 pages, Kindle Edition
First published June 8, 2013
74 people are currently reading
1034 people want to read
About the author
Heather Marsh
3 books56 followersHeather Marsh is a world-renowned philosopher and human rights activist whose work helped shape and accelerate international events like the 2011 15-M movement in Spain and the subsequent global Occupy Movement. Her views on power and organization, as well as her deep knowledge of global human rights issues, provided the backbone for the transition of the Anonymous collective into a global activist movement. She played a key role in the early stages of Wikileaks by directing the focus of the organization's supporters onto human rights issues (and she left the organization in early 2012). She is the only person to have played a pivotal role in the formation of the three most influential movements of the last decade, Anonymous, Occupy and Wikileaks. She created or assisted a large number of other local and global movements worldwide, from the formulation of ideas for political movements to the distribution of aid and information for human rights movements. She has delivered keynotes at many global conferences and events and is the only person to have ever had a talk censored by the Oxford Union.
In 2013, Marsh released the internationally acclaimed book, Binding Chaos, which deconstructs our current relationship with governance and the trade economy and offers a new pathway towards self-governance. In Binding Chaos, she explores both idea based and action based mass collaboration. Her hands-on as well as theory-based experience make her the world's foremost expert in horizontal governance theory.
In 2020, she began publishing the rest of the Binding Chaos series with The Creation of Me, Them and Us. The 12 books in the later series continue the explorations of the original title but at a far more in-depth and comprehensive level. Abstracting Divinity, the much anticipated third installment of the Binding Chaos series, has just been released.
Heather Marsh is published by MustRead Inc.
In 2013, Marsh released the internationally acclaimed book, Binding Chaos, which deconstructs our current relationship with governance and the trade economy and offers a new pathway towards self-governance. In Binding Chaos, she explores both idea based and action based mass collaboration. Her hands-on as well as theory-based experience make her the world's foremost expert in horizontal governance theory.
In 2020, she began publishing the rest of the Binding Chaos series with The Creation of Me, Them and Us. The 12 books in the later series continue the explorations of the original title but at a far more in-depth and comprehensive level. Abstracting Divinity, the much anticipated third installment of the Binding Chaos series, has just been released.
Heather Marsh is published by MustRead Inc.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 26 of 26 reviews
December 19, 2017
Some of the most clear headed and Revolutionary ideas I have found in a while. Got turned on to this book because some Anonymous accounts on twitter kept referencing it, turns out you can download the ebook for free (look it up). It is BRILLIANT. It starts out with a very strong and reasonable critique to Democracy, capitalism and our current society, but then it actually proposes alternatives. A new system based on individual freedom, stigmergy, and actual society built up on relationships and dependency. Heather Marsh has no doubt entered my radar as a voice to be listened to, with some actual ideas on how to change our lives, where to take the world to after the mess we find ourselves into. It is an inspiring and thought provoking book, which challenges every idea you might have of how society works and what to do to fix it.
Must read material for the up coming revolution. 5/5
Must read material for the up coming revolution. 5/5
July 31, 2015
Decomposing our world, refixing references and recomposing our world. That's what the book is doing in a simple way with strong arguments and detailed analysis. Recommended.
April 10, 2020
After being recommended by my Twitter feed these last couple of weeks during the CoVid-19 Pandemic, it seemed like a relevant read given the current political climate. It's full of observations and possible solutions. At 144 pages, it is concise and very easy to read.
Read
June 6, 2025No rating because.. what did I just read? I don’t know that I can say. It’s very theoretical and kind of a mishmash of ideas, which I think reflects the origins of the content.
Marsh argues that representative democracy, direct democracy, and consensus are all failures as systems of governance. She argues (I think) for governance by “user groups” which exist for all possible concerns. This is governance over things that concern certain people by those people and no others. It’s not attached to geographic location (unless that would matter for the user group concern, I assume). I don’t really know what that means practically speaking. She notes the danger of charismatic individuals but the solution seems to be to tell us “just don’t get wrapped up in that” which feels … not good enough. Am I missing something?
I was reminded of The Dispossessed by Ursula K Le Guin since she imagines an anarchist society in that book. Both Marsh and Le Guin use shunning as the punishment for someone who is not helping the community rather than something like prison.
She trashes institutions like universities (oops, I work for a community college system). She wants expertise assessed outside of an institution like that, but I don’t quite understand it. It sounds like she wants to see people’s expertise tested but in a more free-wheeling, user group controlled way. Again, what does that look like practically speaking? Not sure.
I was never sure how much I agreed or disagreed with her because I was never sure I understood what she was saying correctly or needed examples to understand. But I do appreciate some of the ideas she puts forward and the way she is trying to envision something new. I also appreciate that she talks about oligarchy and charismatic people cropping up everywhere even if it’s not acknowledged. I absolutely think that whatever power is available in whatever form will be used by bad actors, so the question becomes how do you minimize it and address it when it crops up.
Marsh argues that representative democracy, direct democracy, and consensus are all failures as systems of governance. She argues (I think) for governance by “user groups” which exist for all possible concerns. This is governance over things that concern certain people by those people and no others. It’s not attached to geographic location (unless that would matter for the user group concern, I assume). I don’t really know what that means practically speaking. She notes the danger of charismatic individuals but the solution seems to be to tell us “just don’t get wrapped up in that” which feels … not good enough. Am I missing something?
I was reminded of The Dispossessed by Ursula K Le Guin since she imagines an anarchist society in that book. Both Marsh and Le Guin use shunning as the punishment for someone who is not helping the community rather than something like prison.
She trashes institutions like universities (oops, I work for a community college system). She wants expertise assessed outside of an institution like that, but I don’t quite understand it. It sounds like she wants to see people’s expertise tested but in a more free-wheeling, user group controlled way. Again, what does that look like practically speaking? Not sure.
I was never sure how much I agreed or disagreed with her because I was never sure I understood what she was saying correctly or needed examples to understand. But I do appreciate some of the ideas she puts forward and the way she is trying to envision something new. I also appreciate that she talks about oligarchy and charismatic people cropping up everywhere even if it’s not acknowledged. I absolutely think that whatever power is available in whatever form will be used by bad actors, so the question becomes how do you minimize it and address it when it crops up.
December 12, 2024
I'm not sure I have a ton to say about this one--strong on inspiration/broad ideas, short on actual details. Centers around "user groups" as a kind of natural way to organize/run society, but seems a wee bit idealistic in terms of grappling with some pretty central human realities (i.e., limited resources and competition). This one came my way because I joined Bluesky and right after the 2024 U.S. election it had a mass migration of users and strong activist/resistance vibes going on (which included me seeing this book mentioned quite a few times). It's possible that Marsh fleshes out her ideas in the next two books in the series. I love the idealism. I love the vision. I'm pretty skeptical about the feasibility, especially in any sort of large, much less global, context. I'll drop a few choice passages so you can get both a sense of the appeal of her pithy pronouncements and what type of re-organization is being envisioned here (stigmergy seems like the central theme).
---------------------------
---------------------------
"We need to recognize immediately the effect our future online tools will have on our future governance. Corporate ownership of our communication tools will cause us to yet again relinquish control to a landlord. Corporate sponsored voice amplification will lead to corporate controlled oligarchy. The ties of server based systems and registered domains make censorship possible and hierarchy unavoidable. The limitations to speech we allow to be imposed on us now will impact our governance as surely as moats and mountains did in the past."
--------------------------
"If individual rights for everyone are put above any group consensus, are a given in every assembly, if they are applied equally without distinction of any kind, there is no need for anyone to have group representation. The completely incongruous situation we have found ourselves in under the current system, where groups demand and sometimes obtain special ‘individual’ rights, would be unnecessary. No group can properly represent the diversity of its members, only the individuals can."
--------------------------
"Group affiliation is essential for the dehumanization of ‘others’ required for systemic violation of the human rights of a group. Group affiliation encourages pride in whatever noun people identify as instead of what actions they have taken. This is the root of all racism, nationalism, agism, sexism, and every other form of bigotry. Group affiliation is never necessary to call out discrimination. Instead of embracing feminism, the world needs to call out masculinism. It is masculinism that keeps men in positions of privilege, and it is rejecting masculinism that will create change. Promoting feminism creates a power struggle with masculinism and leaves minorities such as transgendered people still fighting for their rights. Rejecting all the ‘-ism’s brings equality."
--------------------------
"A great fear associated with abolishing wages or providing anything ‘for free’ is that some people may not work. This fear completely disregards the fact that there have always been people who will not work under the current system and they include the people receiving the highest monetary rewards. Nobody worries about those who are rich not working, just the poor. This seems to indicate a fear of shifting social status, not a fear of people not working."
--------------------------
"Property ownership defined as rights to property always exists. Abolishing property ownership only hides it. Ownership as the right to possess, preserve, rent, sell, use, give away, or destroy property most logically accompanies governance as a right of the user group. Governance as the decision making and management of a system by those with the right to do so and property ownership defined as the rights and responsibilities property is held outside of the user group. When a community public space, or a state lays claim to an ocean, problems are associated with specific property are used interchangeably here as they ought to be inseparable. Property ownership causes problems when control of property is held outside of the user group. When a community owns an individual’s home, an individual owns a community’s public space, or a state lays claim to an ocean, problems are inevitable."
--------------------------
"Societal approval is a far more powerful tool of governance than military might."
--------------------------
"... shared values outlined in a social contract. Any society should be free to join by any individual who agrees to abide by the social contract. A political structure which rejects discrimination based on racism, sexism, ageism, and all other forms of collective shunning yet embraces nationalism is overdue for collapse. An apartheid world is no more logical, sustainable or moral than an apartheid state."
June 9, 2025
This was rough - there's no audiobook and I was struggling with the text. The glossary at the end took up a good 20% of the ebook which I wasn't expecting, and it really should have been at the beginning. I had no idea what was meant by "stigmergy" and yet it was used consistently.
It's not really an accessible book, and some bold claims are made without anything to back them up. The introduction reiterates that it's a collection of essays first published independently, and it shows. This really could have used editing for more clarity and better flow. I finished this without really feeling like I absorbed anything or what the overall point was meant to be.
There are several statements throughout that are points I can agree with or see evidence of, but overall it was too much of a slog to get through.
It's not really an accessible book, and some bold claims are made without anything to back them up. The introduction reiterates that it's a collection of essays first published independently, and it shows. This really could have used editing for more clarity and better flow. I finished this without really feeling like I absorbed anything or what the overall point was meant to be.
There are several statements throughout that are points I can agree with or see evidence of, but overall it was too much of a slog to get through.
July 16, 2022
4 stars: really great but not a must-read
A short but deceptively dense read full of obvious yet alarming observations and bold yet simple proposals. Very little fluff.
A short but deceptively dense read full of obvious yet alarming observations and bold yet simple proposals. Very little fluff.
July 22, 2022
Heather Marsh is a brilliant systems thinker and philosopher and a lot of the ideas in here are revolutionary. For anyone imagining new ways to organize post-democratic societies and post-capitalist economies, I would heavily recommend this book.
For collaborative action she focuses mostly on stigmergy (how ant colonies and termite mounds and wikipedia achieve decentralized coordination at scale). For collaborative organization and knowledge advancement she focuses mostly on epistemic communities / concentric user groups with knowledge bridges (how to allow for expert-led collaboration that doesn't descend into oligarchy).
The writing is at its strongest when it is dismanteling fundamental aspects of modern society with cutting, insightful logic. The writing is at its weakest in failing to provide much detail for exactly how many of these ideas would be implemented in practice.
There are definitely some areas where the ideas she's putting forth seem underdeveloped or not fully thought out, particularly the chapters around a world "without a financial system". (I'm still struggling to imagine how we would manufacture complex electronics like laptops without some form of currency). And there are also some places where the assertions and language she uses are so confrontational that it distracts from the logic of the arguments themselves.
Having said all that, this is a mind expanding read and I think the power of the ideas is more than worth pushing through any small issues along the way.
For collaborative action she focuses mostly on stigmergy (how ant colonies and termite mounds and wikipedia achieve decentralized coordination at scale). For collaborative organization and knowledge advancement she focuses mostly on epistemic communities / concentric user groups with knowledge bridges (how to allow for expert-led collaboration that doesn't descend into oligarchy).
The writing is at its strongest when it is dismanteling fundamental aspects of modern society with cutting, insightful logic. The writing is at its weakest in failing to provide much detail for exactly how many of these ideas would be implemented in practice.
There are definitely some areas where the ideas she's putting forth seem underdeveloped or not fully thought out, particularly the chapters around a world "without a financial system". (I'm still struggling to imagine how we would manufacture complex electronics like laptops without some form of currency). And there are also some places where the assertions and language she uses are so confrontational that it distracts from the logic of the arguments themselves.
Having said all that, this is a mind expanding read and I think the power of the ideas is more than worth pushing through any small issues along the way.
August 12, 2022
Plenty of intriguing thoughts, accompanied by plenty of errors (leading me to drop the rating from a 4 to 2).
I find an issue with the reference and acceptance of IQ as a measure of intelligence (though I should mention that this wasn't a common occurrence but rather a single reference to a researcher who made the following point: “to be a leader of their contemporaries a child must be more intelligent but not too much more intelligent than them. A discrepancy of more than about 30 points of IQ does not allow for leadership, or even respect or effective communication. The same principle appears to hold for levels of knowledge on a given topic.”.
I also find an issue with the frameworks within which patriarchy was critiqued (Amia Srinivasan's “The Right to Sex” contained much more deliberative & incisive arguments, if their novelty isn't an attractive quality in itself), the critique of "gift economies" (which was re-defined to "peer-to-peer barter") and the juxtaposition between "gift economies" and "giving economies" was very strange, to say the least; the very attempt to re-define gift economies into unvocalized barter collapses for obvious reasons.
It increasingly felt more as if this was a collection from a stream of converging thoughts between a group of people, rather than a single person's work. Some of the points made are well-put, then a few pages later the author would attempt to justify and thereby invoke a rationalization of elitism (which I can only describe as a weird form of “open-source meritocratic elitism”, yeah, I know).
The take on property ownership was very bad (excerpt: “Property ownership defined as rights to property always exists. Abolishing property ownership only hides it.”).
The critiques of direct democracy (though I don't remember them as vividly anymore, as I read the first half of the book around a year ago) were misguided at best, the endorsement of "rights" as a plausible concept supports my evaluation that the author is a legalitarian (derogatory) & this work's pros (a couple of good takes) outweigh the cons (some of the takes are capable of feeding individuals with misleading inferential pathways for years).
I find an issue with the reference and acceptance of IQ as a measure of intelligence (though I should mention that this wasn't a common occurrence but rather a single reference to a researcher who made the following point: “to be a leader of their contemporaries a child must be more intelligent but not too much more intelligent than them. A discrepancy of more than about 30 points of IQ does not allow for leadership, or even respect or effective communication. The same principle appears to hold for levels of knowledge on a given topic.”.
I also find an issue with the frameworks within which patriarchy was critiqued (Amia Srinivasan's “The Right to Sex” contained much more deliberative & incisive arguments, if their novelty isn't an attractive quality in itself), the critique of "gift economies" (which was re-defined to "peer-to-peer barter") and the juxtaposition between "gift economies" and "giving economies" was very strange, to say the least; the very attempt to re-define gift economies into unvocalized barter collapses for obvious reasons.
It increasingly felt more as if this was a collection from a stream of converging thoughts between a group of people, rather than a single person's work. Some of the points made are well-put, then a few pages later the author would attempt to justify and thereby invoke a rationalization of elitism (which I can only describe as a weird form of “open-source meritocratic elitism”, yeah, I know).
The take on property ownership was very bad (excerpt: “Property ownership defined as rights to property always exists. Abolishing property ownership only hides it.”).
The critiques of direct democracy (though I don't remember them as vividly anymore, as I read the first half of the book around a year ago) were misguided at best, the endorsement of "rights" as a plausible concept supports my evaluation that the author is a legalitarian (derogatory) & this work's pros (a couple of good takes) outweigh the cons (some of the takes are capable of feeding individuals with misleading inferential pathways for years).
March 22, 2020
This book is a revolutionary act. My entire world perspective changed after reading it and having time to reflect on its message. It is a very well written analysis of the prominent issues facing our society today. Even though it was written in 2013 it completely relates to ongoing global events and the context around which they evolved and it even predicted others. The author was the only core person at the initiations of all three of the influential Anonymous, Wikileaks and Occupy movements (as well as many other pivotal movements of the last decade) so she has serious street cred to back up her ideas. This is by far one of the most important texts of my generation and that I have read. It paints a world where we can all participate in our own governance in a way that is practical, humane, and efficient through mass collaboration.
January 2, 2025
Heather Marsh perfectly summarizes the problems facing society today, and a path forward, one that is hopeful and reasonable. A lot of the ideas in this book are incredible and powerful, you can find them elsewhere, but Binding Chaos consolidates and weaves them together - I would consider it required reading for every citizen. Sometimes the writing is too opaque, although there is a very helpful glossary, but this book shines through its ideas.
January 3, 2025
The books every person needs to read, ESPECIALLY Americans. Heather Marsh answers a lot of questions about the way the world is operating, as well as delivers solutions for how we can make true and lasting change. A pure joy to read. There's hope. Because so many have read Yarvin, Heather Marsh books are a 1000% must-read for all of us. So excited to read Heather Marsh again.
August 13, 2018
This is an amazing book! The 140 or so pages of this text, written by an ex-WikiLeaker and programmer who founded multiple Anonymous campaigns, counter the "iron law of oligarchy" -- Robert Michels' theory that all complex organizations end up dominated by a powerful few.
The book starts by showing that democracy (the usual answer offered to political problems) and group affiliation (groups trying to represent individuals or vice versa, people identifying as nouns like Democrat instead of for having ideas and taking actions) haven't and won't work. Then it talks about what mammals such as humans need to thrive, including individual rights and laws that even children can understand. The main section of the book then talks about how transparent epistemic communities -- working groups of experts -- can save the day as long as they're audited by people working as knowledge bridges (basically two-way teachers who transmit info back and forth between the experts of an epistemic community and the public relying on it) so that they don't become oligarchies and so that they don't get cut off by Great Men co-opting their efforts. Next Binding Chaos delves into stigmergy (mass collaborators should take informed action following ideas rather than get bogged down in hierarchy and consensus) and the pitfalls of financial systems. To replace money, it suggests that we expand the approval economy we already use (think of a road trip where you share food with your fellow passengers because you're all on the same team) into the rest of life. Binding Chaos closes with discussions of personal integrity, personal property, community commons, global commons, and intangible property, as well as where this book fits in relative to Robert Filmer's Patriarcha and John Locke's Two Treatises of Government.
Binding Chaos applies the power of the hacker mindset (experimentation, systems analysis) to critique basic assumptions (do we even need a financial system? Is democracy good?) and to offer solutions that protect human rights and respect autonomy, diversity, and pro-social cooperation. In this work, the author takes seriously the well-being of people devalued by the corporate world, such as those caring for ecosystems and communities or those performing other types of unpaid labor.
The only downsides I see in this book are that it lacks page numbers and sometimes one wishes the author would explain further. For example, what happens with exiles who can't fit into an approval economy? I assume individual rights, commons supplies, and maybe knowledge bridges would help there too, as well as the ability to migrate to other communities, but the book just sometimes leaves one wanting more explanation. All the same, it's totally worth checking out. It's available in full for free at the author's WordPress blog, but print copies can be nice too. Also, good to know that the author is working on more books, starting with Autonomy, Diversity, Society.
The book starts by showing that democracy (the usual answer offered to political problems) and group affiliation (groups trying to represent individuals or vice versa, people identifying as nouns like Democrat instead of for having ideas and taking actions) haven't and won't work. Then it talks about what mammals such as humans need to thrive, including individual rights and laws that even children can understand. The main section of the book then talks about how transparent epistemic communities -- working groups of experts -- can save the day as long as they're audited by people working as knowledge bridges (basically two-way teachers who transmit info back and forth between the experts of an epistemic community and the public relying on it) so that they don't become oligarchies and so that they don't get cut off by Great Men co-opting their efforts. Next Binding Chaos delves into stigmergy (mass collaborators should take informed action following ideas rather than get bogged down in hierarchy and consensus) and the pitfalls of financial systems. To replace money, it suggests that we expand the approval economy we already use (think of a road trip where you share food with your fellow passengers because you're all on the same team) into the rest of life. Binding Chaos closes with discussions of personal integrity, personal property, community commons, global commons, and intangible property, as well as where this book fits in relative to Robert Filmer's Patriarcha and John Locke's Two Treatises of Government.
Binding Chaos applies the power of the hacker mindset (experimentation, systems analysis) to critique basic assumptions (do we even need a financial system? Is democracy good?) and to offer solutions that protect human rights and respect autonomy, diversity, and pro-social cooperation. In this work, the author takes seriously the well-being of people devalued by the corporate world, such as those caring for ecosystems and communities or those performing other types of unpaid labor.
The only downsides I see in this book are that it lacks page numbers and sometimes one wishes the author would explain further. For example, what happens with exiles who can't fit into an approval economy? I assume individual rights, commons supplies, and maybe knowledge bridges would help there too, as well as the ability to migrate to other communities, but the book just sometimes leaves one wanting more explanation. All the same, it's totally worth checking out. It's available in full for free at the author's WordPress blog, but print copies can be nice too. Also, good to know that the author is working on more books, starting with Autonomy, Diversity, Society.
June 14, 2020
Bueno, acabo de leerlo y no se imaginan lo mucho que valoro este libro, porque en sí mismo es el trabajo que esta persona viene manifestando con sus propias acciones. No se manifiesta como una influencia, ejemplo, ni personifica la obra, sino que su libro es contribuye a una manera diferente de pensar las sociedades fuera de las personalidades.
No es utópico pensar un mundo mejor, porque maneras más naturales de vivir existen y siempre han existido, y así mismo es cómo luego encontramos constantes luchas corporativas por querer censurar, patentar y legislar en favor de censurar minorías, conocimiento, - entre muchas más- y a la vez, disfrazar un modelo que categoriza, estandariza una forma única de vivir. No hay nada natural en forzar una forma de vivir.
En el libro se exponen los problemas de la democracia, de la representatividad política, de los bienes comunes, de la propiedad privada, de la coordinación dentro de las mismas comunidades, de las minorías, en entre otras. Muy bueno.
No es utópico pensar un mundo mejor, porque maneras más naturales de vivir existen y siempre han existido, y así mismo es cómo luego encontramos constantes luchas corporativas por querer censurar, patentar y legislar en favor de censurar minorías, conocimiento, - entre muchas más- y a la vez, disfrazar un modelo que categoriza, estandariza una forma única de vivir. No hay nada natural en forzar una forma de vivir.
En el libro se exponen los problemas de la democracia, de la representatividad política, de los bienes comunes, de la propiedad privada, de la coordinación dentro de las mismas comunidades, de las minorías, en entre otras. Muy bueno.
January 3, 2025
Because so many have read Yarvin, Heather Marsh books are a 1000% must-read for all of us. So excited to read Heather Marsh again. I found her books when America was reaching a boiling point (in my time) and they were eye opening (Binding Chaos and Creation of Me, Them and Us.) Also just realized Marsh wrote Mass Collaboration on a Global Scale, which feels so fitting. She brings solutions & hope pivotal to our lifetime.
January 2, 2025
This book has been an excellent read so far. I am finding many of the ideas represented are ideas I have either come to on my own or have picked up from other sources. Seeing those ideas encapsulated in this book has helped me feel like I am not alone, that others would like to live in a much more collaborative society.
September 14, 2024
Roadmap to a better world. What's not to like. Radical yet simple.
Amazing how some humans can have such significantly evolved brains yet articulate concepts so simply and wonderfully. Heather Marsh can change the world. I am still jawdropped.
Amazing how some humans can have such significantly evolved brains yet articulate concepts so simply and wonderfully. Heather Marsh can change the world. I am still jawdropped.
September 12, 2023
This book makes me feel very bonita.
December 29, 2024
I ate this book up in a matter of hours. It felt like Heather Marsh had given form to all of the yearnings of my heart.
Read
December 31, 2024This read like a Portlandia skit, or at least was the political equivalent of something from that show. DNF
February 6, 2025
Interesting at times (I highlighted a few passages), but about as nuanced as a hand grenade at other times.
January 7, 2025
Heather Marsh's Binding Chaos offers a transformative perspective on power dynamics and collaboration through the concept of "giver structures." These structures prioritize decentralized power, mutual support, and trust over traditional hierarchies and transactional systems. By fostering an environment where individuals contribute based on their strengths and needs, giver structures create more equitable and sustainable models for organizing groups. Marsh challenges conventional leadership approaches, advocating for empathy, flexibility, and shared decision-making as tools for fostering creativity, innovation, and resilience in teams.
For managers and collaborators, the book provides practical insights into creating environments rooted in trust, adaptability, and mutual aid. By embracing giver structures, leaders can empower their teams, encourage open communication, and enable meaningful contributions from all members. These principles extend beyond the workplace, offering a framework for healthier interactions in any collaborative setting. Binding Chaos serves as both a critique of existing systems and a guide for building more inclusive and effective partnerships in any context. This is one of those rare, life changing reads that will have a long and powerful impact on my world view.
For managers and collaborators, the book provides practical insights into creating environments rooted in trust, adaptability, and mutual aid. By embracing giver structures, leaders can empower their teams, encourage open communication, and enable meaningful contributions from all members. These principles extend beyond the workplace, offering a framework for healthier interactions in any collaborative setting. Binding Chaos serves as both a critique of existing systems and a guide for building more inclusive and effective partnerships in any context. This is one of those rare, life changing reads that will have a long and powerful impact on my world view.
October 21, 2020
I don't know what to really think about this book except that it displays social justice pursuits in a well-formatted and educated way that you will not find on social media. I love all the references and sources there, and I think it is time I stopped slacking on reading the Communist Manifesto.
January 8, 2025
The way Binding Chaos is written there is incredible potential to liberate readers and their peers towards meaningful activism. The ideas in the book are designed to grow at an exponential rate, and with the glimpses of real world momentum in doing so, manifesting the ideas seems like a real possibility. - Riv
January 28, 2022
Excellent dismantling and analysis of the system that we are currently living in. Solid vision on how to transform it into something new and better. I would love to live in the world the author is proposing here.
January 2, 2025
Absolute essential reading for anyone like me who was feeling hopeless and lost in the world
Displaying 1 - 26 of 26 reviews