This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the original. Due to its age, it may contain imperfections such as marks, notations, marginalia and flawed pages. Because we believe this work is culturally important, we have made it available as part of our commitment for protecting, preserving, and promoting the world's literature in affordable, high quality, modern editions that are true to the original work.
Touted on the deism.com website as "a hard hitting attack on superstition and 'revealed' religion while encouraging the replacement of superstition in our lives and in our ideas of God with God-given reason", this book forgets its own objective throughout - and certainly bamboozled the deists over there.
Allen (and Young) criticized organized religion in general and Christianity in particular, but his Deist assumptions fail in the face of actual reason. Now, his arguments are sound (and quite well written), but he seemed to only want to question the organization and not himself. His own superstitions are rampant, but as he casts his beliefs as "reason" based - without qualification or justification - while disparaging Christian dogma as "tend[ing] to superstition and idolatry", the entire text rang sour.
Disappointed, but enlightened. I had not read any Ethan Allen, and so I learned how learned he was.
I became aware of the work from the book Did America Have a Christian Founding which referenced Allen and the book Nature’s God: The Heretical Origins of the American Republic. Allen was a colonel in the continental army known for his role in taking Fort Ticonderoga and founding Vermont but this book effectively ruined his reputation. Supposedly this is the first public work on deism in the United States published in 1785 even before Paine’s Age of Reason in 1795, and its title is similar to Charles Blount’s 1693 Oracles of Reason. Allen may not have written the book even though he claimed no other source than the bible. The book doesn’t compare to the style of Paine or other deists and is mainly for historical interest.
Effectively the deist position is firstly that god is known by reason not revelation, secondly that the universe is causally closed (naturalism) so that god does not operate or intervene in the universe outside of natural laws, which ultimately means god cannot be imagined and is indifferent to human activity so is a one way relationship from god causally and one way from humanity emotionally and intellectually. Allen differs from the common understanding of deism in that the universe is eternal, the first cause being literally the first thing in existence rather than first in time which may be called pandeism. Deism is thought of as a stepping stone to atheism but in retrospect was a minimum (or maximum) set of beliefs a reasonable person could hold from reason alone but was not successful in replacing the powerful emotional and social needs of religion. My interest in deism is mainly from a political standpoint as a civil religion in a religiously diverse society such as the United States.
This was a good book to read. I became interested in this book while reading "Nature's God: The Heretical Origins of the American Republic" by Matthew Stewart and I was glad I took the effort to find it and read it. The book provides an interesting look and approach to God from the perspective of a natural God based upon man's ability to increase knowledge and make intelligent and reasonable decisions.
This was a tremendously powerful work. It should be read by any seeking a god and an understanding of their own soul, in this culture that often thinks of itself as having outgrown such unfashionable notions. This work very much reminded me of Paine's "Age of Reason", yet was more logical and less vitriolic. Being a deist, I was very much encouraged by this.
Precedes the age of reason by about 12 years or so, but its pretty much the same opinions. Praising the enlightenment deistic vision of God, polite yet critical of Jews and Christians. Highly recommended
Written before Thomas Paine's "The Age of Reason" this book was, some believe, written by Ethan Allen and it is credited to him. Some also believe that Allen did not have the education or thoughtfulness to write in such a way but it has never been proven.
The book is a short read but Allen makes his points clear and concise about Christianity, Judaism and popular religion in general. He is not a fan of the way it is taught or believing it in general, he is a deist through and through and explains why.
It's an interesting read although I preferred "Age of Reason" or Joseph Priestley's religious writings even though they came from a different angle. Thomas Jefferson's letters to his nephew regarding religion were insightful to the time and thought process as well.
Pity about the deism (which a little more reflection might have cured him of*), but a lot of very good arguments concerning "revealed religion".
* Since he argues earlier in the book that "God" is supernatural, and that we can know nothing about anything supernatural, his claim at the end of the book that "All our knowledge of things is derived from God" seems poorly thought out.
The language, cumbersome and verbose by today’s standards, employed by Allen beautifully articulates the intellectual disconnect between reason and reviled religion. This is a foundational reading for anyone acknowledging the existence of a creator but rejecting the intermediary individuals, dogma and institutional barriers religions place between humanity, as part of nature, and of nature’s creator.