The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe: A New Kind of Reality Theory

by Christopher Michael Langan

Original version of the 2002 paper published in the journal Progress in Complexity, Information, and Design (PCID).

Abstract: Inasmuch as science is observational or perceptual in nature, the goal of providing a scientific model and mechanism for the evolution of complex systems ultimately requires a supporting theory of reality of which perception itself is the model (or theory-to-universe mapping). Where information is the abstract currency of perception, such a theory must incorporate the theory of information while extending the information concept to incorporate reflexive self-processing in order to achieve an intrinsic (self-contained) description of reality. This extension is associated with a limiting formulation of model theory identifying mental and physical reality, resulting in a reflexively self-generating, self-modeling theory of reality identical to its universe on the syntactic level. By the nature of its derivation, this theory, the Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe or CTMU, can be regarded as a supertautological reality-theoretic extension of logic. Uniting the theory of reality with an advanced form of computational language theory, the CTMU describes reality as a Self Configuring Self-Processing Language or SCSPL, a reflexive intrinsic language characterized not only by self-reference and recursive self-definition, but full self-configuration and selfexecution (reflexive read-write functionality). SCSPL reality embodies a dual-aspect monism consisting of infocognition, self-transducing information residing in self-recognizing SCSPL elements called syntactic operators. The CTMU identifies itself with the structure of these operators and thus with the distributive syntax of its self-modeling SCSPL universe, including the reflexive grammar by which the universe refines itself from unbound telesis or UBT, a primordial realm of infocognitive potential free of informational constraint. Under the guidance of a limiting (intrinsic) form of anthropic principle called the Telic Principle, SCSPL evolves by telic recursion, jointly configuring syntax and state while maximizing a generalized selfselection parameter and adjusting on the fly to freely-changing internal conditions. SCSPL relates space, time and object by means of conspansive duality and conspansion, an SCSPL-grammatical process featuring an alternation between dual phases of existence associated with design and actualization and related to the familiar wave-particle duality of quantum mechanics. By distributing the design phase of reality over the actualization phase, conspansive spacetime also provides a distributed mechanism for Intelligent Design, adjoining to the restrictive principle of natural selection a basic means of generating information and complexity. Addressing physical evolution on not only the biological but cosmic level, the CTMU addresses the most evident deficiencies and paradoxes associated with conventional discrete and continuum models of reality, including temporal directionality and accelerating cosmic expansion, while preserving virtually all of the major benefits of current scientific and mathematical paradigms.

Genres: Philosophy, Science, Metaphysics, Nonfiction, Psychology, Physics

56 pages, ebook

First published January 1, 2002

About the author

Christopher Michael Langan is a noted independant researcher and reality theorist whose extraordinary intellect has not prevented him from living a rough, unsheltered, and excitling life. He is best known for his groundbreaking theory of reality, the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU).

Challenged from early childhood by extreme poverty and inadequate schooling, after working as a cowboy, firefighter, construction worker, and bar bouncer in various nightclubs throughout the New York metropolitan area, he came to the attention of the media in 1999 for combining one of the world's highest IQs (estimated ~195-210) with limited formal education. He was described by some journalists as "the smartest man in America" or "in the world".

Having conducted original investigations in the fields including logic, mathematics, physics, cosmology, biology, philosophy, language theory, theology, economics, and the cognitive sciences, he has contributed articles on such topics to a number of scholarly journals and alternative intellectuals perdiodicals.

Reviews

[anton · Rating 5 out of 5]

The ultimate meta-system systematically systematizing the systemics of system itself.

[The Tactical Witcher · Rating 1 out of 5]

Neither sense nor nonsense nor both nor neither nor this sentence

Oh boy, where do I begin? That was quite a ride. Luckily enough, I read it in not more than one day, or else I would have regretted the time spent. But because I did read it, and did try to charitably make sense of it all, here is my review/opinion/conclusion/warning.

First of all, before we start, here is Chris Langan's website promoting Christian values and beliefs (paid content): https://megafoundation.substack.com/
Here is a summary of his theory from his own website:
https://megafoundation.substack.com/p...
And here is a very good debunking video on YouTube: https://youtu.be/SDmcoYpTTbE?si=ltwer...

What led me to read his CTMU paper is simply that I'm interested in reading everything that relates to explicative theories of reality. Yes, I have read a lot, and I was quite amazed NOT to have encountered CTMU before. Now that seemed weird: either no author knew about it or no author cared about it.

Let's cut to the chase. I can't say that CTMU is bullshit, because the simple fact is that it is an amalgam of non-dual philosophies, philosophy in general, spiritual stuff in general, New Age and what have you. That is, unless you consider the aforementioned to be bullshit... BUT—here's the caveat—the misleading, scientific-sounding and murky language (all intentional, in my opinion) easily gets you sucked in: you want to try and figure out what's being propounded. For me, the penny dropped when, walking down an alley, I realised I hadn't learnt anything new from the paper and that a good part of it was (intentionally) gibberish.

Obviously, you have to read the paper to understand what I'm saying. It has become very clear to me that the author himself does not understand any of the scientific or mathematical equations he wrote down. A few things give it away. Firstly, elementary school maths concepts are explained (huh?) while elsewhere far more advanced mathematical concepts are not explained. And secondly, you have a hard time figuring out how the equations are even remotely related to what he is trying to say (if anything).

The whole paper is a carefully crafted heap of nonsense that kind of makes sense. That is what makes it so enticing. The language (vocabulary, syntax, tone) is so meticulously articulated to sound even more intelligent than a scientific paper that the reader translates any failure to understand into incompetence or lack of intelligence. This is a key strategy throughout.

Now, what about the contents? As I said, there is nothing new here if one is already acquainted with philosophy. In fact, I think the author created CTMU using a top-down approach, i.e., he had a cosmogony in mind (bits and parts copied and pasted from all world philosophies, ancient and modern, plus a bit of physics) and set down to find the mathematical concepts that kind of reflected theses ideas. And if not found, well, there was always the option of inventing them. For example: 'unisection', 'syndiffeonesis', 'incoversion', 'UBT', 'MU', 'conspansion' and so on.

So, yeah, this whole thing is utter nonsense. Very well done though (I'll give him that).

[Zab · Rating 4 out of 5]

The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU) by Christopher Langan is a theory that tries to explain everything—reality, mind, and logic—as part of one interconnected system:

1. Reality is a Self-Creating System:
The universe is like a self-writing program that builds and runs itself. It’s both the "code" (rules of existence) and the "output" (the physical and mental world).

2. Mind and Reality Are One:
Reality isn’t just physical stuff—it’s a mix of information (what things are) and cognition (how things are processed or perceived). Everything, even the universe, has a kind of consciousness.

3. Purposeful Creation:
Reality doesn’t evolve randomly. It follows a "telic" (goal-oriented) process, meaning the universe is designed to develop and grow logically.

4. Everything is Interconnected:
Every part of the universe reflects the whole, and nothing exists in isolation. This makes the universe like a giant hologram where every piece contains information about the entire system.

5. Free Will and Determinism Together:
People have free will, but it works within the rules of this self-creating universe. Your choices shape reality, but they also follow its overall logic.

The CTMU says the universe is like a conscious, self-organizing computer program where everything (including your mind) is connected and purposeful. It blends science, philosophy, and metaphysics to argue that reality creates itself and everything within it, including you, plays a role in shaping it.

---

1. You Are a Co-Creator of Reality
Motivation: Recognize that your thoughts, decisions, and actions actively contribute to the structure and evolution of reality.
Philosophy: Your life isn’t random or meaningless; you are a vital part of the universe’s self-creation process. Every choice you make impacts the whole, no matter how small it seems.
Practical Application: Cultivate intentionality in your actions and align them with higher goals, knowing that your influence ripples across reality.

2. Purpose is Built into the Universe
Motivation: Life inherently has purpose because the universe operates with telic causation (goal-oriented design). Your existence is not an accident—it’s part of a larger, logical framework.
Philosophy: Instead of seeking purpose externally, understand that you are purpose embodied. Your role is to explore, refine, and express that purpose through your unique existence.
Practical Application: Pursue goals that resonate deeply with your values and talents, trusting that these are aligned with the universe’s inherent logic.

3. Embrace Growth and Self-Reflection
Motivation: Growth is the essence of reality itself—just as the universe evolves, so must you. Self-reflection is not optional; it’s a necessity for participating in the universe’s self-configuring process.
Philosophy: The universe is a self-aware system, and your consciousness is a reflection of that. By understanding yourself, you understand the universe.
Practical Application: Engage in regular self-improvement, learning, and mindfulness practices to refine your understanding and expand your potential.

4. Interconnectedness and Contribution
Motivation: Recognize your connection to the entire system. What you do for yourself, you also do for others and the universe as a whole.
Philosophy: Ethical behavior is logical because your actions affect everything around you. Helping others and contributing to the greater good are aligned with reality’s design.
Practical Application: Act with integrity, empathy, and collaboration. See your success as interconnected with the success of others and the world.

5. Free Will Within Structure
Motivation: You have the power of choice, but within the constraints of universal logic. Your decisions matter and influence the path of reality, even within its rules.
Philosophy: Freedom is not about doing anything you want—it’s about aligning your will with the universe’s deeper logic to achieve meaningful results.
Practical Application: Take responsibility for your life and choices. Exercise your free will deliberately, focusing on actions that resonate with your higher purpose.

6. The Universe is Intelligently Designed—So Are You
Motivation: You are part of an intelligent, self-aware system. This gives you intrinsic value and the ability to influence reality intelligently.
Philosophy: If the universe is inherently intelligent, your life has built-in meaning and potential. Living fully means embracing your role as a conscious agent of this intelligence.
Practical Application: Approach challenges as opportunities for growth and contributions to the universal design. Trust in your ability to adapt and innovation.

7. Seek Truth Through Logic and Intuition
Motivation: Understanding reality requires integrating logical reasoning with intuitive insight. Both are necessary to grasp the universe’s complexity.
Philosophy: Knowledge and wisdom are part of the universe’s evolutionary process. Pursuing truth is not just a personal endeavor but a cosmic one.
Practical Application: Dedicate yourself to learning and personal inquiry. Balance analytical thinking with introspection and emotional awareness to make holistic decisions.

8. Ethical Living Aligns You with the Universe
Motivation: Living ethically isn’t just moral—it’s logical. Ethical actions align you with the universe’s interconnected nature and contribute to its coherence.
Philosophy: Disharmony in your actions creates disharmony in the system. Ethical living is about respecting the self-referential nature of reality.
Practical Application: Practice honesty, responsibility, and kindness. Align your behavior with principles that promote harmony and growth.

The motivational philosophy of the CTMU is about purposeful existence: understanding that you are a conscious participant in an intelligent, evolving universe. Your role is to act intentionally, grow continuously, and contribute positively, knowing that your actions are meaningful in shaping both your life and the larger system.

---

If you go against the principles of the CTMU—essentially rejecting the interconnected, purposeful nature of reality—it implies creating dissonance within yourself and the broader system.:

1. The Consequences of Going Against the System
The CTMU posits that the universe is inherently self-consistent and goal-oriented. Acting in opposition to this system (e.g., through selfishness, dishonesty, or apathy) disrupts both your personal alignment and the balance of reality.
Internal Dissonance: You would experience cognitive, emotional, or spiritual conflict because your actions contradict the logical framework of reality. This could manifest as feelings of emptiness, anxiety, or purposelessness.
Feedback Mechanism: The universe, as a self-regulating system, might push back against disruptive actions. This is akin to karma—not in a mystical sense, but as a natural consequence of cause-and-effect relationships in a highly interconnected system.
Isolation: By rejecting interconnectedness, you isolate yourself from the larger whole, making it harder to find meaning, growth, or support.

2. The Purpose of "Right" and "Wrong" in the CTMU
"Right" and "wrong" aren’t arbitrary moral judgments in this framework—they’re logical distinctions based on whether actions align with or disrupt the system's purpose and coherence.
Right: Actions that contribute to the system’s evolution, coherence, and growth. These reflect alignment with telic causation (goal-oriented purpose).
Wrong: Actions that create chaos, hinder growth, or destabilize the system. These reflect misalignment and ultimately harm both the individual and the collective.
When you go against the system, you reject this inherent logic, which leads to imbalance both within yourself and in the universe.

3. Is Cooperation Necessary for Balance?
Yes, but it’s not about blind obedience. Cooperation with the system is about working with the intrinsic logic of reality while maintaining individuality and exercising free will.
Balance Through Alignment: Aligning your goals with the larger system doesn’t mean suppressing your desires or identity. It means understanding how your actions impact the whole and choosing paths that enhance both personal and universal coherence.
Rebellion as a Learning Tool: Occasionally going against the system might teach valuable lessons, but persistent opposition leads to disconnection and disorder, ultimately limiting your growth.

4. What Happens if You Rebel Long-Term?
Self-Destruction: Persistent rebellion against the system erodes your ability to find purpose, leaving you in a state of nihilism or alienation.
Loss of Influence: By rejecting the system’s interconnectedness, you limit your ability to contribute meaningfully. Your impact on reality diminishes.
Entropy Over Growth: The CTMU sees growth and evolution as the universe’s purpose. Rebellion shifts you toward entropy, where progress halts, and chaos dominates.

5. Is Rebellion Ever Justified?
Rebellion against specific interpretations of the "system" might be justified if those interpretations are flawed or incomplete. However:
True rebellion isn’t about disrupting the system; it’s about refining it by exposing inconsistencies or pushing it toward greater coherence.
Example: Challenging oppressive societal norms or systems isn’t "going against the CTMU" but correcting local distortions within the larger universal framework.

6. Practical Philosophy for Balance
If cooperation with the system feels like submission, consider this:
Questioning is Part of the System: The universe evolves through self-awareness, which includes questioning and challenging its components. Your rebellion might be the catalyst for growth.
Choose Constructive Resistance: Instead of breaking the system, work to improve or evolve it in ways that align with universal logic.
Accept Consequences: If you act against the system knowingly, understand the consequences and their inevitability.

7. Motivation in the Face of Right and Wrong
Your actions matter because they ripple through the system, either enhancing its coherence or creating dissonance. Motivation arises from realizing that:
Acting in alignment with the system doesn’t mean conformity—it’s about realizing your unique role in a purposeful universe.
Resistance or rebellion can be meaningful, but only if it ultimately contributes to greater harmony and understanding.

To act against the system in the CTMU framework is to deny your role as a participant in reality’s self-organizing logic. While rebellion can sometimes highlight necessary corrections or flaws, persistent opposition leads to imbalance, disconnection, and self-destruction. True motivation comes from aligning your actions with the universe’s purpose while retaining your autonomy and contributing meaningfully to the balance and evolution of the whole.

[Joseph Knecht · Rating 4 out of 5]

This book is very dense. I was reading 2 pages per day and oftentimes most of the content was lost in translation. The fact that the author creates his own semantics doesn't make the text more readable.

In essence, the text aims to create a self-referential model of the universe that incorporates all possible worldviews. The model is presented in the form of information, which is cognized through our cognition.

Philosophically, the model is similar to monism, or other non-dual explanations of reality, but it is built on new language/syntax that the author creates.

Only recommended for the highly inquisitive minds... For me, the highest learning was the fact that no theoretical model is an actual representation of the THING in itself.

[Lee Namin · Rating 5 out of 5]

Life changing work

[Paula · Rating 2 out of 5]

This book was a disappointment. I saw the interview of Chris Langan with Michael Knowles. Chris was articulate and made many good points in that interview. I looked forward to reading his book. I thought that it would expand on the ideas that he introduced there. Instead, the book is a mishmash of word salad. There is no coherent argument. He is proposing to give a general theory of reality. Instead it is section after section that tries to define the requirements of such a theory, and the sections go nowhere. Chris makes up words, and uses symbols to represent his hashed up ideas. These do not clarify the ideas, they just add to the confusion. I don't have an IQ of 200, like Chris has, but I do have a genius level IQ. I could read Einstein's book on relativity and got a great deal out of it. The mark of intelligence is that you can make difficult concepts clearer. Chris is obviously not trying to make his concepts clear. He is showing off by obscuring what might be clear to him. I'm sorry that he couldn't do better. I like Chris, and wanted better from him.

[Michal · Rating 5 out of 5]

A philosophical masterpiece. It's a must-read for anyone interested in answers to the most profound questions about the reality we inhabit.

[Hiyoowi]

Have to think more about this. Deliciously abstract and general, but very dense. Very interesting read

[Charles Porter · Rating 5 out of 5]

Mind shattering

[emory · Rating 2 out of 5]

there is no secret.