Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Image in the Clay

Rate this book
Central character is based on Norman Shillingsworth, sophisticated and city educated, returns to the Northern Territory where he grew up. But the top end in 1929 is raw and uncompromising and riddled with prejudices; and Norman faces the harsh reality of coming to terms with his true origins in a very hostile atmosphere.

85 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1964

3 people want to read

About the author

David Ireland

12 books26 followers
David Ireland was born in Lakemba in New South Wales in 1927.

Before taking up full-time writing in 1973 he undertook the classic writer's apprenticeship by working in a variety of jobs ranging from greenkeeper to an extended period in an oil refinery.

This latter job provided the inspiration for his second (and best-known) novel, The Unknown Industrial Prisoner, which brought him recognition in the early 1970s and which is still considered by many critics to be one of best and most original Australian novels of the period.

He is one of only four Australian writers to win the Miles Franklin Award more than twice

He was appointed a Member of the Order of Australia in the Queen's Birthday Honours of June 1981.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (50%)
4 stars
0 (0%)
3 stars
1 (50%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for zed .
579 reviews149 followers
January 1, 2018
This is the first ever published work by the truly underappreciated Australian literary great, David Ireland. This is a play. Both the original producer and David Ireland himself write a preface in my very battered edition. The producer mostly covers the trials and tribulations of starting the play but Ireland’s is by far the most interesting in that he explains his writings. I found him articulating what it is that I have always enjoyed and admired about his novels. On this play he writes “No opinions are presented: my interest in aborigines is no more than anyone else’s, except that they are people. That is my interest” Considering at this point in time I have read 8 of his novels and now this play, I am of the opinion that that sentence has summed up all his writings so far. For example if that statement he has made had one word, ‘aborigines’ changed to any of the following:- ‘workers’ ‘drunks’ ‘women’ ‘red setters’ whatever; his novels will not have changed one iota in that he is an observer of people and has written about them in his then surroundings.
The Unknown Industrial Prisoner for example, is everything I personally have observed in my working life in manufacturing. Ireland was able to work in an oil refinery and observe his fellow workers in his own surroundings.

With that this play and the novel that it consequently led to, Burn, are not written in a manner that I have become used to with Ireland. There has been a sense of ‘knife to the heart’ REALISM in both the play and Burn. All other novels are written with short sharp chapters that made it all read very fragmented, sometimes surreal and almost modernist. This play and the novel Burn are far from that. They are brutally realistic and view the issues with indigenous life with brutality in a way that I find very disconcerting. There are no role models. Gunner, the main character, is not interested in life outside his own plot of dirt. His entire family are dragged along with that to a degree. The play is explicitly hard edged in its observation of indigenous camp life. Considering that Ireland had worked cutting timber in the late 1940’ his comment above is striking. He makes no opinion, this is all observation because they are and were the people that he had an interest in while in his surroundings along the Murrumbidgee River. It was all about the individual as dirt, images in the clay.

With that comes one of the most poignant moments of the play. The youngest son has returned from the city. His name is Gordon and he returns with gifts for all, a few beers, a pipe for the old man, a dress for his mum. After a while the truth comes out. He was never a big shot in the city but just another no one. And with that a Black no one. “They looked at me and they didn’t see a better suntan then they had” “What they saw was dirt” He caught that questioning look as to why didn’t he wash. He did, scrubbing himself to soreness. He changed jobs in hope of conforming “but that made no difference… if only I could sing” “They think I am straight from the dead heart of the country” when he was far from that. Gordon explains to his family that he cannot throw a boomerang, has never been to a corrobboree nor seen a didgeridoo. But white man thinks he is “primitive” and should be kept away from the women and kids. “I’ll tell you where the dead heart of Australia is! It’s right back there in the city” BAM! This is still relevant to today’s Australia. An urban society that promotes itself as anything but. Images in the clay!

I read Burn, the novel that morphed from this play and consider it superb. My review here. https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Why Irelands play and novel on indigenous Australia has disappeared into obscurity is a tragedy, but then tragedy are both the play and the novel if the truth be told.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.