The conventional story of the end of the cold war focuses on the geopolitical power struggle between the United States and the Ronald Reagan waged an aggressive campaign against communism, outspent the USSR, and forced Mikhail Gorbachev to €œtear down this wall.€In There Is No Freedom Without Bread!, a daring revisionist account of that seminal year, the Russian-born historian Constantine Pleshakov proposes a very different interpretation. The revolutions that took place during this momentous year were infinitely more complex than the archetypal image of the €œgood€ masses overthrowing the €œbad€ puppet regimes of the Soviet empire. Politicking, tensions between Moscow and local communist governments, compromise between the revolutionary leaders and the communist old-timers, and the will and anger of the people€”all had a profound influence in shaping the revolutions as multifaceted movements that brought about one of the
Constantine Pleshakov emigrated to America in 1998 and is a former foreign policy analyst at the Institute of U.S. and Canada Studies in Moscow. In 2012, The Princeton Review named him one of the 300 best college professors in the U.S. He lives in Amherst, MA.
I found this a surprising look at the events leading up to and including the 1989 overthrow of communism. Pleshakov disagrees with the usual interpretation of events--that the communist countries were entirely under the thumb of the Soviet Union and overturned its power in 1989. "There is nothing in the story," he writes, "to support the conventional image of the good masses throwing off Moscow. Rebellion was a domestic matter. Eastern Europeans were, naturally, very happy to see the Soviets go, but they were fighting not the empire, as in 1989 it was at its nadir, but their own rulers. What happened in Eastern Europe was a clash of classes revealed as a civil war in Poland and Romania, nonviolent revolution in Czechoslovakia, and peaceful transfer of power in Hungary and Bulgaria." (236)
Pleshakov believes that there was a good amount of "buying in" to the system by its citizens--certainly more than most of us have been taught--and that their revolts came from their belief that the government(s) had failed to fulfill its obligations under this system. Food shortages and food price increases being a primary example of this failure. Interesting revisionist look.
Interesting to read that Communism in Eastern Europe was not instituted by the Red Army or the Soviets, but as a popular response to the failures of the immediately-postwar governments?
Aside from some political quibbles like that, it read very well, and flowed nicely through the events of the 1980s, when the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact were fading faster than anyone knew.
Very readable account of the end of communism in Eastern Europe. A revisionist explanation of why what happened from a leading proffesor/history writer of Russian history.