Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration

Rate this book
There are more psychoanalytic theories today than anyone knows what to do with, and the heterogeneity and complexity of the entire body of psychoanalytic though have become staggering. In Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis , Stephen A. Mitchell weaves strands from the principal relational-model traditions (interpersonal psychoanalysis, British school object-relations theories, self psychology, and existential psychoanalysis) into a comprehensive approach to many of the knottiest problems and controversies in theoretical and clinical psychoanalysis.

Mitchell’s earlier book, Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory , co-authored with Jay Greenberg, set the stage for this current integration by providing a broad comparative analysis of important thinking on the nature of human relationships. In that classic study Greenberg and Mitchell distinguished between two basic paradigms: the drive model, in which relations with others are generated and shaped by the need for drive gratifications, and various relational models, in which relations themselves are taken as primary and irreducible. In Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis , Mitchell argues that the drive model has since outlived its usefulness. The relational model, on the other hand, has been developed piecemeal by different authors who rarely acknowledge and explore the commonality of their assumptions or the rich complementarity of their perspectives.

In this bold effort at integrative theorizing, Mitchell draws together major lines of relational-model traditions into a unified framework for psychoanalytic thought, more economical than the anachronistic drive model and more inclusive than any of the singular relational approaches to the core significance of sexuality, the impact of early experience, the relation of the past to the present, the interpenetration of illusion and actuality, the centrality of the will, the repetition of painful experience, the nature of analytic situation, and the process of analytic change. As such, his book will be required reading for psychoanalytic scholars, practitioners, candidates in psychoanalysis, and students in the field.

326 pages, Hardcover

First published November 15, 1988

25 people are currently reading
300 people want to read

About the author

Stephen A. Mitchell

48 books55 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
53 (59%)
4 stars
28 (31%)
3 stars
6 (6%)
2 stars
2 (2%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
Profile Image for Morgan Blackledge.
805 reviews2,629 followers
June 23, 2023
I’m utterly blown away by this book.

FUCK ME RUNNING!

Words fail.

I want to write a great review of it.

I really should.

But again.

Words fail.

SO FUCK IT!

5/5 SUPER STARS 🌟
Profile Image for Beyza.
206 reviews31 followers
January 7, 2019
Her bölümü ayrı güzeldi ama "Devamlılık ve Değişim" bölümünden ne kadar keyif aldığımı anlatamam. Yazar, kitap boyunca, psikanalitik teorilerin birbirleriyle benzer veya birbirlerinden farklı oldukları noktaları, bana psikanaliz sürecini hatırlatan bir sıralamada derinlemesine inceliyor. Hem bildiklerimi pekiştirdiğim, hem de üzerine birsürü şey öğrendiğim bir kitap oldu. Bu kitabı Türkçe'ye kazandırdıkları için İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları'na ve muhteşem çevirileri için Gülenbaht Algaç ve İrem Anlı'ya teşekkürlerimle...
168 reviews6 followers
November 19, 2021
With the advent of Allan Schore's work, this book seems simple and slightly out of touch with current thought. However, from a purely psychoanalytic frame, it certainly offers plenty for thought. Stephen's clear writing style and ability to delineate different theories and the implicit contradictions between them as well as useful and lively modes of moving forward, offer a lot of food for thought and ways of thinking about analysis and interpersonal relationships.
Profile Image for Blaze-Pascal.
305 reviews2 followers
December 17, 2017
I had trouble reading this as a Lacanian... there are a lot of things I have to buy before I can really read it... I'll probably come back to it if I ever go to a relational conference or something.
Profile Image for Loren.
16 reviews
February 1, 2020
In my completely biased opinion, Relational Psychoanalysis is where it's at, y'all.

I know you came here for this kind of exhaustive, balanced critique. You're welcome.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.