Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Probability and Statistics

Rate this book
This edition of the volume has contemporary statistical methods integrated into the text. Other new features include a chapter on simulation, a section on Gibbs sampling, what you should know boxes at the end of each chapter, and remarks to highlight difficult concepts.

816 pages, Paperback

First published December 1, 1975

34 people are currently reading
381 people want to read

About the author

Morris H. DeGroot

12 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
40 (30%)
4 stars
50 (37%)
3 stars
31 (23%)
2 stars
5 (3%)
1 star
6 (4%)
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
Profile Image for Dmitri.
38 reviews36 followers
February 18, 2015
I've actually gone through several mediocre Statistics books before settling on this one. They all seem to be identical from the outset, but this one explains things a little bit more clearly than the others.

The only thing I didn't like, apart from the huge-page format and the annoying "International Edition" crap on the front was the fact that certain key ideas were explained on the basis of examples and even exercises that were seen previously. This required a lot of back-and-forth flicker, which I found to be annoying. (And impossible if you are on an e-reader.)

Overall, I would recommend this as a general-purpose beginner stats book.
Profile Image for Henry.
159 reviews74 followers
July 24, 2021
The only reason to read this in [insert current year] is if you have to do so. I honestly don't think anyone would read this by personal choice.

Eventually, someone will write the Great American Computational Statistics Book*; until then students will be forced to learn the basics as our elders did many decades ago and then unlearn all of it as soon as they meet modern machine learning and Bayesian data analysis.

I should say at least something positive about the book: DeGroot does win some points over e.g. Wasserman for actually understanding what Bayesian inference is good for. Oh and also the cover of this edition is pretty cool looking.

(*The best contender for a GACSB is probably James et al, An Introduction to Statistical Learning , but it loses marks from me for not having both R and Python in the text and exercises. Alternatively there's Gelman et al which, while great, suffers from the same problem.)
Profile Image for Moon Na.
4 reviews9 followers
September 23, 2012
I used this book while attending the introduction to statistical method for economists course in my bachelor, however, just finished it recently. De Groot wrote it in detailed and clear way. Among hundred books in this field, it's the best choice to start struggling with prob and of course, stat.
However, personally, some parts, especially proofs and descriptions, are unnecessarily intuitive and pretty lengthy. It seems the only point of this book I don't like.
Profile Image for Emma Bossuyt.
13 reviews
Read
July 22, 2021
The only subject of 11 I passed this year (first year civil engineering) lol
Profile Image for Bubu.
51 reviews16 followers
January 25, 2022
for Statistics in Applications 2021 Fall
Profile Image for Dr_Hope.
61 reviews1 follower
July 9, 2016
This book has a very coherent set of examples and homework questions so that even if you don't go to lectures, you are still able to read by yourself and solve the homework questions from the book.

However, it doesn't cover all the necessary aspects on every topic and it doesn't have a very clear structure of the content inside each chapter.

Using it as a dictionary is a good idea. But you have to digest and reorganize everything by yourself
Profile Image for Bob.
127 reviews16 followers
October 15, 2012
Used as textbook by Robert Redinger, Lecturer, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University for Probability and Statistics course sequence for first year MSIA (MBA) students, 1980-81.
5 reviews2 followers
August 23, 2009
Best book I have read on both subjects. Just the right amount of math for someone that knows calc (doesn't need a hand held), but isn't a mathematicians (very simple proofs).
Profile Image for Dayton Outar.
113 reviews5 followers
February 3, 2023
This can be a difficult read. The exercises are pretty good. However, I think more work is required from the Author and the Publishers to make the information easier to understand.
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.