Sebastien’s answer to “Hi, Sebastien! The Greatcoats tetralogy has often been discussed as part of the grimdark subgenre. …” > Likes and Comments

30 likes · 
Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by The Ghoul (new)

The Ghoul in the Attic Not at all, in fact I got the same feeling when I read Traitor's Blade, and especially Knight's Shadow. Thank you for the answer, it feels awesome to receive such a thought-out response.


message 2: by Nedam (new)

Nedam For what it's worth, I see Greatcoats as the opposite of grimdark. There is true friendship, true valour, truly well-meaning leaders, true heroes, true hope for building a better world, and villains have a chance for redemption. It may be far on the scale of how much it's a struggle to be good and how difficult it is to improve things, but the way I see it, grimdark doesn't say it's very difficult but impossible.


message 3: by The Ghoul (new)

The Ghoul in the Attic @Nedam - I don't disagree with your definition of grimdark, but I have always felt like the subgenre carries undertones of hopefulness. As in, the hope of a better world and a just society running as a (very) hidden motivation for some characters. Granted, grimdark being grimdark, this rarely happens. But I think you will find out that by altogether removing hopefulness, many grimdark characters lose their sense of agency.

I think Abercrombie is especially good in this regard, as he often writes characters that WANT to be good, but are rarely allowed to be.


message 4: by Hj (new)

Hj Sterling Abercrombie is overrated. The Greatcoats series are far better and Sebastien Castell is a far better writer.


message 5: by The Ghoul (new)

The Ghoul in the Attic @Hj Sterling Wasn't looking for a discussion on that point, but thank you for your input.


back to top