Eva’s
Comments
(group member since Feb 07, 2015)
Eva’s
comments
from the Science Book Chat group.
Showing 1-16 of 16



The first one, which I uploaded back in September, is about the role of classic books on the perception of science. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0bhk...

But I and others think that the books he list are not very accessible at all!
In response, Rebekah Higgit asks what books others would recommend, and starts her list with a book that genuinely has been popular among a wide audience (Silent Spring).
Chad Orzel made his own list of recommendations, which is also much more accessible than Weinberg's.
But meanwhile, Scicurious asks what the point of recommending books is in the first place. Looking at Weinberg's list, he isn't genuinely recommending what YOU should read, but he's sharing what he likes and showing off a bit.
She writes:
"I realized the people telling me to read specific lists of books were people interested in upholding the status quo. People who were invested in the current lists of “What Makes you look Smart,” because they had already ticked off those lists. Most of these people were not smarter than I was. Most were not better educated. Most were not even interesting people."
So what do you think? Do you recommend books to people? Do you think Weinberg's list is a good introduction, or do you prefer Orzel's? And does Scicurious' blog post make you think about your use of Goodreads? Why do YOU recommend books?

I love that book!

AsapSCIENCE (liked)
Keeping Women in Science (Wasn't what I expected)


They both regularly talk about science books.




Feel free to leave your Twitter account info in this thread, but we'll also be able to find you if you use the hashtag!


Hi, I'm Eva, and I read a lot of books about science, so I thought I'd create a place to talk about them.