P.J.’s
Comments
(group member since Aug 07, 2020)
P.J.’s
comments
from the Wodehouse cracks me up group.
Showing 1-4 of 4

This was almost exactly my view as well, John, although I would say that I was less ‘apprehensive’ and more ‘determined to hate it’ and yet, somehow, here we both are.
I didn’t want Bertie to cross that Rubicon either, particularly in view of the degree to which his horror of the prospect drove so many — if not all — of the original plots. But I had to admit in the end that it was deftly and respectfully and, of course, hilariously handled.
Mar 14, 2021 12:18PM

Neither could I Elizabeth, but I have found the original books a perfect antidote ..."
I fully understand but note that Sebastian Faulks' Jeeves and the Wedding Bells is a warm, happy, hilarious close to second to the real thing. And I wasn't expecting to like it (I might even have been determined not to) and yet, I really did.
Ben Schott, however, is not a close second nor a distant third. I read Jeeves and the King of Clubs, in fact, because of Jeeves and the Wedding Bells. I read the second installment, Jeeves and the Leap of Faith, because I had read the first, and now I'm trapped in a quality dive that I can only hope stops at a trilogy.
For those interested, here are my reviews of The King of Clubs and Leap of Faith.
Oct 12, 2020 07:38AM

I wholly agree. I have no objection to Faulks giving satisfaction where Wodehouse elected not to, nor even to Schott parachuting Jeeves & Wooster behind enemy lines, but The Wedding Bells felt like a daring yet legitimate venture into new territory, while The King of Clubs reads like a reboot.
Oct 11, 2020 08:51AM
