Mingyong Cheng > Mingyong's Quotes

Showing 1-8 of 8
sort by

  • #1
    Alfred North Whitehead
    “Art is the imposing of a pattern on experience, and our aesthetic enjoyment is recognition of the pattern.”
    Alfred North Whitehead

  • #2
    Alfred North Whitehead
    “We think in generalities, but we live in details.”
    Alfred North Whitehead

  • #3
    Alfred North Whitehead
    “The misconception which has haunted philosophic literature throughout the centuries is the notion of 'independent existence.' There is no such mode of existence; every entity is to be understood in terms of the way it is interwoven with the rest of the universe.”
    Alfred North Whitehead

  • #4
    Alfred North Whitehead
    “We think in generalities, but we live in detail. To make the past live, we must perceive it in detail in addition to thinking of it in generalities.”
    Alfred North Whitehead

  • #5
    Alfred North Whitehead
    “Nature is probably quite indifferent to the aesthetic preferences of mathematicians.”
    Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the Modern World

  • #6
    David Abram
    “come to call “ideograms.” An ideogram is often a pictorial character that refers not to the visible entity that it explicitly pictures but to some quality or other phenomenon readily associated with that entity. Thus—to invent a simple example—a stylized image of a jaguar with its feet off the ground might come to signify “speed.” For the Chinese, even today, a stylized image of the sun and moon together signifies “brightness”; similarly, the word for “east” is invoked by a stylized image of the sun rising behind a tree.5 The efficacy of these pictorially derived systems necessarily entails a shift of sensory participation away from the voices and gestures of the surrounding landscape toward our own human-made images. However, the glyphs which constitute the bulk of these ancient scripts continually remind the reading body of its inherence in a more-than-human field of meanings. As signatures not only of the human form but of other animals, trees, sun, moon, and landforms, they continually refer our senses beyond the strictly human sphere.6 Yet even a host of pictograms and related ideograms will not suffice for certain terms that exist in the local discourse. Such terms may refer to phenomena that lack any precise visual association. Consider, for example, the English word “belief.” How might we signify this term in a pictographic, or ideographic, manner? An image of a phantasmagorical monster, perhaps, or one of a person in prayer. Yet no such ideogram would communicate the term as readily and precisely as the simple image of a bumblebee, followed by the figure of a leaf. We could, that is, resort to a visual pun, to images of things that have nothing overtly to do with belief but which, when named in sequence, carry the same sound as the spoken term “belief” (“bee-leaf”). And indeed, such pictographic puns, or rebuses, came to be employed early on by scribes in ancient China and in Mesoamerica as well as in the Middle East, to record certain terms that were especially amorphous or resistant to visual representation. Thus, for instance, the Sumerian word ti, which means”
    David Abram, The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World

  • #7
    Donna J. Haraway
    “Make Kin Not Babies.”
    Donna J. Haraway, Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene

  • #8
    Donna J. Haraway
    “It matters what matters we use to think other matters with; it matters what stories we tell to tell other stories with; it matters what knots knot knots, what thoughts think thoughts, what descriptions describe descriptions, what ties tie ties. It matters what stories make worlds, what worlds make stories.”
    Donna J. Haraway, Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene



Rss