129 books
—
152 voters
Economics Books
Showing 1-50 of 66,545

by (shelved 5843 times as economics)
avg rating 4.01 — 888,516 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 3139 times as economics)
avg rating 4.06 — 33,994 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2677 times as economics)
avg rating 3.88 — 34,500 ratings — published 1776

by (shelved 2432 times as economics)
avg rating 4.09 — 60,099 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 2271 times as economics)
avg rating 4.16 — 21,234 ratings — published 1946

by (shelved 2051 times as economics)
avg rating 4.21 — 25,948 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1990 times as economics)
avg rating 4.15 — 25,519 ratings — published 1944

by (shelved 1884 times as economics)
avg rating 4.27 — 23,904 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1878 times as economics)
avg rating 4.37 — 13,923 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 1772 times as economics)
avg rating 4.17 — 569,996 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1751 times as economics)
avg rating 4.00 — 133,823 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1720 times as economics)
avg rating 3.90 — 14,877 ratings — published 1962

by (shelved 1638 times as economics)
avg rating 4.30 — 168,704 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1623 times as economics)
avg rating 3.96 — 119,866 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1476 times as economics)
avg rating 4.16 — 23,171 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1430 times as economics)
avg rating 4.29 — 52,359 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1428 times as economics)
avg rating 4.22 — 14,432 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1412 times as economics)
avg rating 3.81 — 29,189 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 1400 times as economics)
avg rating 3.90 — 30,286 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1373 times as economics)
avg rating 3.85 — 5,697 ratings — published 1935

by (shelved 1298 times as economics)
avg rating 4.12 — 129,828 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1291 times as economics)
avg rating 3.84 — 93,247 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1251 times as economics)
avg rating 4.03 — 19,358 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1242 times as economics)
avg rating 4.17 — 15,216 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1231 times as economics)
avg rating 3.68 — 191,098 ratings — published 1848

by (shelved 1109 times as economics)
avg rating 4.08 — 70,089 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1093 times as economics)
avg rating 3.96 — 12,433 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1091 times as economics)
avg rating 4.16 — 8,799 ratings — published 1953

by (shelved 1070 times as economics)
avg rating 4.16 — 8,353 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1003 times as economics)
avg rating 4.34 — 4,207 ratings — published 1940

by (shelved 966 times as economics)
avg rating 4.02 — 9,833 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 913 times as economics)
avg rating 4.22 — 9,386 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 884 times as economics)
avg rating 4.13 — 20,224 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 865 times as economics)
avg rating 4.24 — 147,232 ratings — published 1949

by (shelved 823 times as economics)
avg rating 4.29 — 14,187 ratings — published 1887

by (shelved 809 times as economics)
avg rating 4.09 — 6,919 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 803 times as economics)
avg rating 4.29 — 291,727 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 794 times as economics)
avg rating 3.87 — 39,135 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 786 times as economics)
avg rating 4.20 — 5,644 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 782 times as economics)
avg rating 4.03 — 9,600 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 758 times as economics)
avg rating 4.02 — 32,537 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 725 times as economics)
avg rating 4.23 — 6,083 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 719 times as economics)
avg rating 3.69 — 102,381 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 711 times as economics)
avg rating 3.87 — 8,129 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 706 times as economics)
avg rating 4.20 — 5,183 ratings — published 1944

by (shelved 700 times as economics)
avg rating 3.89 — 11,435 ratings — published 1867

by (shelved 692 times as economics)
avg rating 4.10 — 56,370 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 675 times as economics)
avg rating 3.99 — 2,905 ratings — published 1942

by (shelved 669 times as economics)
avg rating 4.36 — 198,346 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 664 times as economics)
avg rating 3.83 — 8,851 ratings — published 2008

“The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money.
Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.
But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.”
― Men at Arms: The Play
Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.
But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.”
― Men at Arms: The Play

“In regards to the price of commodities, the rise of wages operates as simple interest does, the rise of profit operates like compound interest.
Our merchants and masters complain much of the bad effects of high wages in raising the price and lessening the sale of goods. They say nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits. They are silent with regard to the pernicious effects of their own gains. They complain only of those of other people.”
― An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
Our merchants and masters complain much of the bad effects of high wages in raising the price and lessening the sale of goods. They say nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits. They are silent with regard to the pernicious effects of their own gains. They complain only of those of other people.”
― An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
The following shelves are listed as duplicates of this shelf:
economic, economics-and-finance, economics-finance, finance-and-economics, finance-econ, finance-economics, and finance-economy