23 books
—
1 voter
Informatics Books
Showing 1-50 of 778

by (shelved 6 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.36 — 23,085 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 6 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.04 — 16,908 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 6 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.47 — 4,829 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 5 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.40 — 10,391 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 5 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.33 — 23,634 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.13 — 34,318 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.01 — 14,903 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.20 — 11,852 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.15 — 2,218 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.35 — 9,249 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 4 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.44 — 11,195 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.24 — 8,780 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.74 — 6,396 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.86 — 69 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.85 — 20,549 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.39 — 8,604 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.34 — 2,671 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.23 — 1,222 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.30 — 9,441 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.51 — 8,033 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.42 — 1,813 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 3 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.29 — 638 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.75 — 775 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.59 — 2,308 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.46 — 1,114 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.14 — 669 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.15 — 5,754 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.84 — 5,280 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.11 — 11,562 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.15 — 33 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.33 — 6,888 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.26 — 2,832 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.48 — 2,894 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.07 — 2,216 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.97 — 1,690 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.41 — 39 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.63 — 41 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.30 — 56,898 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.87 — 29,493 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.90 — 2,188 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.07 — 891 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.00 — 27,014 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.11 — 63 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.23 — 988 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.21 — 2,133 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.14 — 9,873 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.09 — 535 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.23 — 8,659 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 3.84 — 388 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as informatics)
avg rating 4.17 — 1,378 ratings — published 2005

“Freud described three great historical wounds to the primary narcissism of the self-centered human subject, who tries to hold panic at bay by the fantasy of human exceptionalism.
First is the Copernican wound that removed Earth itself, man’s home world, from the center of the cosmos and indeed paved the way for that cosmos to burst open into a universe of inhumane, nonteleological times and spaces. Science made that decentering cut.
The second wound is the Darwinian, which put Homo sapiens firmly in the world of other critters, all trying to make an earthly living and so evolving in relation to one another without the sureties of directional signposts that culminate in Man. Science inflicted that cruel cut too.
The third wound is the Freudian, which posited an unconscious that undid the primacy of conscious processes, including the reason that comforted Man with his unique excellence, with dire consequences for teleology once again. Science seems to hold that blade too.
I want to add a fourth wound, the informatic or cyborgian, which infolds organic and technological flesh and so melds that Great Divide as well.”
― When Species Meet
First is the Copernican wound that removed Earth itself, man’s home world, from the center of the cosmos and indeed paved the way for that cosmos to burst open into a universe of inhumane, nonteleological times and spaces. Science made that decentering cut.
The second wound is the Darwinian, which put Homo sapiens firmly in the world of other critters, all trying to make an earthly living and so evolving in relation to one another without the sureties of directional signposts that culminate in Man. Science inflicted that cruel cut too.
The third wound is the Freudian, which posited an unconscious that undid the primacy of conscious processes, including the reason that comforted Man with his unique excellence, with dire consequences for teleology once again. Science seems to hold that blade too.
I want to add a fourth wound, the informatic or cyborgian, which infolds organic and technological flesh and so melds that Great Divide as well.”
― When Species Meet

“Computer science only indicates the retrospective omnipotence of our technologies. In other words, an infinite capacity to process data (but only data - i.e. the already given) and in no sense a new vision. With that science, we are entering an era of exhaustivity, which is also an era of exhaustion. Of generalized interactivity abolishing particularized action. Of the interface which abolishes challenge, passion, and rivalry between peoples, ideas and individuals which was always the source of the finest energies.
It is difficult to find a remedy for our own sadness, because we are ourselves implicated in it. It is difficult to find a remedy for other people's sadness because we are prisoners of it.”
― Cool Memories
It is difficult to find a remedy for our own sadness, because we are ourselves implicated in it. It is difficult to find a remedy for other people's sadness because we are prisoners of it.”
― Cool Memories