Junk Science Books
Showing 1-48 of 48

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 18,343 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.12 — 2,069 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 11,849 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.03 — 37,323 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.84 — 10,902 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.14 — 8,999 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.43 — 80,525 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.10 — 1,453 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.17 — 296,219 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.56 — 9,559 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.82 — 163,985 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.63 — 146 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.38 — 1,702 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.62 — 2,195 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.02 — 2,058 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 308,078 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.61 — 705 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.44 — 3,088 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.53 — 872 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.87 — 7,297 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.88 — 43 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.81 — 6,636 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.70 — 11,039 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.82 — 12,521 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.94 — 471 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.24 — 17,141 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.03 — 47,893 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.53 — 13,644 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.09 — 23 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.16 — 167 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.47 — 1,742 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.95 — 22 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.45 — 53 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.40 — 5 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.80 — 1,487 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.65 — 173 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.39 — 51 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.29 — 136 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.66 — 288 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.77 — 122 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.49 — 47 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 15,868 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 4.18 — 504 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.60 — 40,282 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 3.82 — 82 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 1 time as junk-science)
avg rating 2.88 — 2,131 ratings — published 1997

“Claiming that a person who views the Bible as nothing but a compendium of myths is thus denying the existence of a Creator is like claiming a person who rejects the junk science behind ‘man-made global warming’ is denying the existence of atmosphere.”
―
―

“Note, please, that I condemn only junk science (as does Mr Delingpole): this is in fact a measure of my, and his, regard for good science. Junk bonds do not, by their existence, condemn the existence of markets; crony capitalism – which is indissolubly tied to the ‘Green’ movement and its loudest advocates, who are bought and paid for by cronyism – does not condemn capitalism; junk science does not invalidate science as a discipline. Indeed, the greatest and most implacable enemies of junk bonds are and by rights ought to be traders; of crony capitalism, capitalists; and of junk science, those who hold true science in its just regard.”
―
―