Classics Without All the Class discussion
Archives
>
Have you read?
message 1:
by
Riah
(new)
Jan 02, 2013 06:22PM

reply
|
flag


It is a nice read. You start the book and suddenly, before you even know you finished it.
It just didn't got me. Yes, I cried and I laughed and I smiled. But I guess, thats what this kind of books do to you.
Maybe I'll give John Green another try, with a different topic.
And sorry if this didn't help you at all, it's just kind of difficult to explain, without spoiling..
But do be clear, John Green writes nice, it's nice to read, not difficult at all and you always know where you are. But in this case, it was just the topic. A very difficult topic and I don't think he did too well with it. Well, and the characters where "too perfect" in all this mess. Its just, that I experienced it different..

I have felt the same about many books. I feel emotion towards a book but somehow still don't much care for it. Or maybe its the topic I don't care for. Either way, I get what you're saying


Read it, not a favorite though. To me the character devolpment was just so-so


Les Misrables.
I do not know a lot of people that have read it. I have never heard a bad thing about it. However it is a long book and that coupled with it being French literature (things lost in translation) is what worries me. I have read long books but sometimes it is different when it comes to literature.
Any thoughts/advice on this?
Thanks!

Les Misrables.
I do not know a lot of people that have read it. I have never heard a bad thing about it. However it is a long book and that cou..."
It's one of my favorite books, but it tends to slow down in parts and sometimes it is really hard to connect with the characters, especially in the beginning. When I first read it, it took me forever to get into it, but I like it now. I think a lot of it's problem is the translation, but I wouldn't know since my french isn't the best and I've never attempted reading it in french.

I'd definitely check out some information on the available translations before you pick it up though. A lot of older translations may well be abridged versions; either to slim down those author tangents or due to 'moral reasons'. I'm reading it for another book group and someone said that one of the key scenes in the first half was totally missing!
I went with Rose because it's one of the most modern unabridged translations, there are extensive notes at the back in case you want to look up any of the references, and after reading a few interviews with the translator she really seemed in love with the original - but I did only do basic research.
I purchased the Rose translation of Les Misérables but haven't started it yet. I'm currently reading War and Peace and I'm not even going to try to read them at the same time! But I'm excited about tackling Les Mis.
A good translation is the key to any non-native language book. A bad translation can ruin everything.
A good translation is the key to any non-native language book. A bad translation can ruin everything.

Jessica wrote: "I was wondering about a specific literature book...
Les Misrables.
I do not know a lot of people that have read it. I have never heard a bad thing about it. However it is a long book and that cou..."

Jason wrote: "I purchased the Rose translation of Les Misérables but haven't started it yet. I'm currently reading War and Peace and I'm not even going to try to read them at the same time! But I'm excited abo..."


Oooh. How is Moby Dick? Obviously good if you're rereading it. Is one of those books I really want to read but have heard such mixed things from the few people I know who have read it/part of it.


PS: I love English teachers and professors. Almost became an English teacher myself.


I'm right with you on this one Sebastian! I love classics (my masters was in The Victorian novel so I don't mind a weighty tome!) but MD bored me to tears. I also can't bear DH Lawrence. What a self conscious pile of old tripe! not so great when I actually had to teach Sons and Lovers to an access to higher ed class of serious adults in awe of 'literature' :)

I'm reading War and Peace right now! I'm only 350 pages in but I think it's pretty great. I'm reading the Maude translation from the 1942 Inner Sanctum edition of the book. I HIGHLY recommend it because of the supplemental maps and character lists.

Anyways... the book is a small one.. a little over 100 pages...
Anyone who's already read??

Great Gatsby is much a love it or hate it. Many people like it I found it a huge waste of time, but its short enough so don't let me discourage you from reading it.


Anyone who's already read??
"
Yes, it's quite a quick read, and if you view it as observations on modern obsessions with wealth and celebrity, still very pertinent. (I've reviewed it here, without spoilers: http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...)

"Lady Chatterley's Lover" was by far the worst experience I've ever had in English literature. It was also my first and last read for Lawrence. It simply lacks all the aestheics that people read classics for. I'm not even sure if it should be called a classic. If I were a classic, I'd be sooooooo offended.


If a reader has a negative encounter with Sons and Lovers and/or Lady Chat, both considered classics and thus (presumably) Lawrence's best works, why would he look for more by that writer? It is a shame, if there are better books of his to be read. But it's understandable.

You know Travis, I had the same outcome when I read Great Gatsby. I could not stand the characters. I am one of those people if I like a character I will be loyal to you forever. But I just didn't get attached to anyone.
Thought about rereading (seeing as my first read of was in high school) but it put such a bad taste in my mouth I am avoiding it.


Oh yes please. I sometimes think my 15-year-old would like him too, but whenever I read the synopsis of The Graveyard Book (which seems to be a favorite)it sounds so awful and creepy, like a kid's nightmare.

If a reader has a negative encounter with Sons and Lovers a..."
I think that's worth raising my head above the barricades for a considered response: if I had based my opinion of Salman Rushdie upon his 'Moonlight's Children' I might never have picked up 'The Satanic Verses' or 'The Moor's Last Sigh'. Vikram Seth's 'Golden Gate' should not deter the reader from moving on to 'An Equal Music'. 'Pickwick Papers'(which I find difficult) is not everybody's taste as an introduction to Dickens, but then, should you discover 'Dombey and Son'.....
I seem to read a lot of extreme reactions to certain books and I am sometimes guilty of it myself, but it should surely be possible to gain something positive from every work, even when the overall impression is bad. An encounter with a book? I don't know. Surely to read is to broaden, isn't it? And that implies depth.

I have only read one American Gods and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I think Neverwhere is next after I go through the stack I have on my end table.

Oh I agree with you that it can be worth checking out more of an author's work than his best known, or most notorious, or most popular book(s). But I can see why people, with a limited amount of reading time but long lists of books to read, might decide to pass on more Rushdie or Dickens or Lawrence if they'd read and disliked a book that is considered one of the author's great works.
Of course that is one of the good things about a venue like this: discussing books with people unlike ourselves, from different backgrounds and with different reading tastes. Talk about broadening! Because of this conversation, I might someday pick up another of D H Lawrence's books. I wouldn't have thought to before.

Oh I agree wi..."
Hmmm. Might be a subject for a separate thread - Lesser-known books by the author.....

That sounds like a good idea. You could start it off with your recommendations for D H Lawrence. :-)

Not to mention his fantastic Vocabulary..
Lolita is truly a masterpiece.. something beyond "Just a story about a perverted pedophile"
Easily one of the best books to be ever written!

Oh yes please. I sometimes think..."
American Gods is the one I read. It was amazing. I also read Coraline . It is a children's book but very entertaining.


I absolutely loved All Quiet on the Western Front. It is amazing and moves pretty fast. Also, I read an excerpt of The Things They Carried, which was fantastic. I want to read the entire book really bad. They are very different types of books, but both fiction and definitely worth reading. :)

Anyone read anything by her that liked it? If so, where would you suggest someone begin? Favorite?

Laura,
A friend of mine highly recommended Fall of Giants by Ken Follett. It also has a sequel Winter of the World.

Anyone read anything by her that liked it? If so, where would you sugges..."
I absolutely love Flannery O'Connor! This collection of short works by her: Everything That Rises Must Converge is great. I loved the short story, Parker's Back. It is so funny and sad and weird and disturbing - like all of these stories. :) I highly recommend it.

It is one of my most favorite books. :)



I've read Carmilla years ago and I liked so much. Joseph Sheridan LeFanu wrote several gothic and mystery novels that i found very interesting, like the adventures of dr. Hesselius, one of the first investigators of the occult (or the first).

I've read Carmilla years..."
I will have to research some of his other pieces to add to my to-read shelf. I am very intrigued by him. THe Adventures of Dr. Hesselius sounds interesting. Thank you for the info. :)
Books mentioned in this topic
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell (other topics)Paradise Lost (other topics)
Paradise Lost (other topics)
Nothing (other topics)
The Lovely Bones (other topics)
More...