Terminalcoffee discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
135 views
Rants / Debates (Serious) > Group Announcement: This is No Longer a Private Group, Hippies.

Comments Showing 1-50 of 200 (200 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 3 4

message 1: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Since the moderators didn't bother telling you, you might want to know! The group has changed from a public group, open to all, to a private group.

"This is a private group. Members must be invited or approved by the group's moderator."

How does this affect you, if you are already a member? Well, if you leave the group, you may not be welcomed back in, since moderator(s) will have to approve your entry.

If you are an unpopular or hated member of TC, you may want to bear this in mind.


message 2: by [deleted user] (new)

Perhaps GR has forced the change. Maybe the mods haven't had a chance to make a comment yet. I know GR has made other changes, age related, that have affected other groups within the last 24 hours.

If it was the mods choice, I respect their decision. I am sure they would have avoided it if they could. They have shown an unwillingness to make it private in the past.


message 3: by Kevin (new)

Kevin  (ksprink) | 11469 comments LG - what was the real point of your "announcement"?


message 4: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) It's Ed's fault.


message 5: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments Do we really have "hated" members?


message 6: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11837 comments Good thing all of my sock puppets are already members.


message 7: by Sarah (new)

Sarah | 13814 comments You may have noticed a marked decline in the number of troll and sock puppet posts recently. Those are the only people we have been rejecting. Everyone else is approved.


message 8: by Jim (new)

Jim | 6484 comments Kevin wrote: "LG - what was the real point of your "announcement"?"

Good question.


message 9: by Heidi (last edited Jan 30, 2013 08:25AM) (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Susan wrote: "Do we really have "hated" members?"

I have no hate for anyone in this group, only love... and fierce determination to make the grumps and curmudgeons of the world smile a bit more. Sock puppets make me grumpy, though. In those cases, I need a Heidi to cheer me up.


message 10: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments Yeah. Sock puppets are grump makers for sure. I like your fierce determination to enforce smiles. A Heidi cheer up thread should be instituted, if one does not already exist.


message 11: by Rosanne (new)

Rosanne (rosannema) Ummm, what are sock puppets and trolls? I've been away for quite a while and picked today to catch up.....


message 12: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments ::glomps Barb and Misha::

I did and do bound all around. :D

It is an unrealistic though admirable goal to keep everyone happy all of the time. Keeping TC safe and yummy to be apart of is a job all the moderators do very well, in my opinion. I also agree with all that Gail and Misha have said. Our moderators are kick ass awesome!


message 13: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Ha! Oh. I was ready to pass the cheese tray in this thread, too.


message 14: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Kevin wrote: "LG - what was the real point of your "announcement"?"

To let members know there had been a change. The moderators should have, but since they didn't, I took it upon myself. I consider it a major change when a group has always been public and open to all comers, and then suddenly is private and exclusive. There is no other "real point" besides that.


message 15: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Susan wrote: "Do we really have "hated" members?"

Yes.


message 16: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Heidi wrote: "This is a very bizarre thread. What was your motivation in posting this, LG? It seems very aggressive to have started a discussion of this sort in the way you did. I take no issue with making an..."

It may seem aggressive, but I didn't intend it to be. I think when there's a change in policy, it should be announced. When it's not announced, it comes across as something secretive and ulterior. I think openness and transparency should be a priority. That's all.


message 17: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
I get why the group was temporarily made private, and I really do hope it's only temporary, but private groups make me uncomfortable. It has the connotation of a secret club, a secret society. That you have to pass some kind of test before you're deemed acceptable. It feels inherently a little hostile. Like a country club where only rich, white people can get in. Or golf clubs or social clubs that only admit men.


message 18: by Jonathan (last edited Jan 30, 2013 04:20PM) (new)

Jonathan Lopez | 4726 comments It has the connotation of a secret club, a secret society. That you have to pass some kind of test before you're deemed acceptable. It feels inherently a little hostile. Like a country club where only rich, white people can get in. Or golf clubs or social clubs that only admit men..."

I understand the sentiment and sympathize but think it may be somewhat misplaced in this instance. TC is more like a haphazardly constructed hobo encampment that has belatedly built a moat and drawbridge around itself using ashcan lids and tree limbs after being raided by the tougher, meaner hobos who reside down the way. The moderators did what they thought right in responding to a longstanding and corrosive abuse--well done, imho.--and probably matters will sort themselves out as time goes on.


message 19: by Jim (new)

Jim | 6484 comments Thank you Jonathan.


message 20: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments I love the hobo camp description. That is so good Jonathan.

::hits tin can with stick to scare off meanie hobos::


message 21: by Jim (last edited Jan 30, 2013 04:59PM) (new)

Jim | 6484 comments Lobstergirl wrote: "It may seem aggressive, but I didn't intend it to be. I think when there's a change in policy, it should be announced. When it's not announced, it comes across as something secretive and ulterior. I think openness and transparency should be a priority. That's all. "

LG, just for thought another way to have handled this may have been to start the thread with possibly a less aggressive approach like - "Hey Mods, I noticed that this group is now private did something happen or why the change?"


message 22: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
Jim, perhaps I should have done it that way.

On top of yesterday's sudden change in 18+ group rules, and Goodreads making the change without notifying anyone (as they are wont to do, make a change and then when users are surprised and outraged, appear and apologize that they didn't notify people in advance - when they almost never notify anyone in advance of anything, so their apologies always seem disingenuous), it felt like an excess of secrecy and lack of transparency and not-being-notified across the site.


message 23: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments GR made changes yesterday?!


message 24: by Lobstergirl, el principe (new)

Lobstergirl | 24778 comments Mod
If a group is 18+, members now have to enter a birthdate to "prove" they are over 18. But no one was notified, and a bunch of people couldn't access their groups.


message 25: by CD (new)

CD  | 1577 comments Lobstergirl wrote: "If a group is 18+, members now have to enter a birthdate to "prove" they are over 18. But no one was notified, and a bunch of people couldn't access their groups."

Wow! I have a birthday? I thought I sprang fully formed from the sea . . . :)


message 26: by Félix (new)

Félix (habitseven) I'm just glad that Ed & Co. are gone. They are gone, right?


message 27: by Jim (new)

Jim | 6484 comments Félix wrote: "I'm just glad that Ed & Co. are gone. They are gone, right?"

To the best of our knowledge yes.


message 28: by [deleted user] (last edited Jan 30, 2013 07:11PM) (new)

Jonathan wrote: "The moderators did what they thought right in responding to a longstanding and corrosive abuse--well done, imho.--and probably matters will sort themselves out as time goes on."

Love you Jonathan! Usually when people say "imho" it bugs the begingoes out of me. Usually because they are being a pratt! You however I know are being humble about it. Love!


I think I received a friend request from one of Eds Co's. I suspected the person of trying to build up his friends prior to joining the group.

http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/14... This guy Jack. I agreed to the friendship ('cause I never say no) but was exceptionally nervous about it at the time.

I hate being suspicious of people. :(


message 29: by [deleted user] (new)

::sigh:: Thanks Bun. I'd been keeping an eye on it. Just in case it wiggled.


message 30: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments All that Ed shit had me crazy paranoid and freaked out. Fucking weirdo.


message 31: by [deleted user] (new)

You were awesome Susan. There was no way I would have survived the Ed bashing you received.


message 32: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11837 comments Gail wrote: "I'd been keeping an eye on it. Just in case it wiggled."

TWSS


message 33: by [deleted user] (new)

:)


message 34: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments Gail wrote: "You were awesome Susan. There was no way I would have survived the Ed bashing you received."

Eh. It wasn't so bad. I was maybe indignant or a little hurt for a few seconds after I realized how awful of a thing it is to be considered an E-anything but nobody knew me. Then I just wanted to put everybody in a bubble with little and protect all of you.

Besides what I gained was more than well worth it.


message 35: by Phil (last edited Jan 30, 2013 07:45PM) (new)

Phil | 11837 comments This is my private (new) page.


message 36: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments Hey! Put that thing away!


message 37: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments Wooo!

::Glomps Dubs::


message 38: by Phil (new)

Phil | 11837 comments Susan wrote: "Hey! Put that thing away!"

TWSS


message 39: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments ::Starts carding people for Phil's private page show::


message 40: by Scout (new)

Scout (goodreadscomscout) | 3594 comments Yay. This is a private 18+ group. Let's keep all those OTHERS out. I feel much more comfortable now.


message 41: by janine (new)

janine | 7709 comments We've already discussed that in this thread, Scout. We're not an 18+ group and we're not keeping others out, just Ed and his army of sockpuppets.


message 42: by Aliyah (new)

Aliyah | 369 comments what does this mean? exactly? I remember that I had to get TC's approval before I signed up?


message 43: by Aliyah (new)

Aliyah | 369 comments Scout wrote: "Yay. This is a private 18+ group. Let's keep all those OTHERS out. I feel much more comfortable now."

hey Scout, I may be fake (in your opinion) but this is the internet after all. I get all your points about my thread about the Gyllenhaals, I might have been sloppy with the content, but don't go around and attack people. You don't know me and I don't know you.


message 44: by Susan (last edited Mar 08, 2013 06:10PM) (new)

Susan | 6406 comments I really like that it is private, now. It feels even more like a safe little haven to me. I don't feel like it is exclusive or snubbing since it really isn't as the moderators are letting people in and only keeping bad people out. We have bouncers and people working the door. That is cool and a sacrifice of our moderator's time which I greatly appreciate.

***I deleted my next post which was a picture of little***


message 45: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments HA! Heidi, she is a HE!! :D

I keep his locks long and so we get that all the time.


message 46: by evie (new)

evie (ecie) | 4437 comments Little is scrumptious!


message 47: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments Silly girls. I would hate to annoy the becrapus out of you. I wonder if little will have girls trying to call him too late at night and I will have to say things like "It is 9 o'clock and much too late for little to be on the phone"!
I was the nitwit younger sister that fawned over my older brother's friends.


message 48: by Susan (new)

Susan | 6406 comments And in Paul Frank jammies, no less! :)


message 49: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Exactly!


message 50: by [deleted user] (new)

He is adorable Susan.


« previous 1 3 4
back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.