Daemon
discussion
discuss the ending.
date
newest »



I plan to read the sequel. It's a very good book.

This seems to be the drift many authors are taking, one of semi-compromise instead of a grand-mal confrontation and specific finality.

I enjoyed both books and wasn't disappointed. I think it was pretty obvious towards the end of Daemon that many of the characters were changing their opinions. The Major was shown to be just as ruthless and murderous a character as Loki/Gragg and the books raised some interesting issues. I've always wondered if a computer program could do a better job of governing, as it would remove the corruptible "greed" factor inherent to human government. I'm not expecting a third installment at all.

The novel was great in the way it built up the character of Sebeck, but I was dumbfounded by how quickly the foundations of his character disintegrated at the end. He opposed the Daemon so much, only to welcome it with open arms at the end. I know, that it could show a side of human nature that is so easily manipulated, but still, the way it ended didnt quite satisfy.
Now, I welcome ambiguity in endings greatly. But questions still need to be answered, at least a few. Yes, the Daemon was slowly moulding itself into society, which is expected. Yes, there was the obvious link between Philips and Ross, and I was happy with enough with the ending. But what happened to Gragg and The Major?!?! I had suspected from the beginning that the Major wasnt to be trusted, for one, it was never in his POV, therefore he had lots to hide. But it still didnt satisfy.
Now, I know I'm not understanding things properly, so I would love to hear what everyone else has to say on this issue. I would just like some other theories to satisfy, so I can finally place this book in my shelf.