Reading Romances discussion
Participate!
>
So... what do you think?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Denise
(new)
Apr 20, 2013 10:23AM

reply
|
flag







I agree with Abigail and Rosanna, story and an HEA are all important. The best sex scene won't make up for a bad story or a crappy ending.


Kidding.

Oh, yes. Thanks everyone for commenting. I know I kind of threw the question out there without leaving my own thoughts. I just wanted to know what others thought. Personally, I've enjoyed both romances with the sex behind closed doors and romances with the scene written in hot detail. I'm not much on chaste hand holding either. That's not very realistic.
I agree with Abigail, Jacqueline, and Rosanna. Hot sex doesn't make up for a poorly written book. I know a lot of readers loved Fifty Shades of Gray, but I don't think they loved it for the romance. Lots of sex doesn't make up for a thin plot line and dreadful writing. If the book doesn't build up with sexual tension, throwing a sex scene into the plot just to have a sex scene makes the story hiccup for me. I'll skip over it, but not because I'm not a prude. There have been some sex scenes I've had to go back and reread because they were so well written.
But it's not the sex in a romance that gets me. You know, if you read enough romance novels, some of those scenes start reading a lot alike! What catches my breath is that first moment when the attraction becomes so obvious the hero and heroine can't ignore what's going on between them anymore. For me, that's romance.

Me too! I love the developing chemistry, and how each character deals with the realization that they are falling for the other.

..."
There you go, C.E.! You put it in a nut shell. If you don't feel that chemistry, if you don't feel like cheering them on or smacking them because they don't see what's happening, the romance is just blah and all the sex in the world won't fix it.