Classics Without All the Class discussion
Archives
>
Formative Reading
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Frederick
(new)
Apr 21, 2013 08:30AM

reply
|
flag






I will never forget this book. I read it when I was in fifth grade and remember it moved me to tears. I cried as I finished the end and cried for a good deal after I finished it. Old Yeller is another one I read as a kid that I'll always remember and it had a similar effect.


His story is something I recommend reading to anyone. He was afraid for his life, but his biggest fear was the fact that, for so long, he lost his best friend (the piano). I find that beautiful, to love music that much.




I can't really say that the book has had some kind of influence on my personality, but it has had quite a bit of influence on my interests as an adult.




I LOVED Nancy Drew when I was a girl. I would check out loads of these books from the library, and would hardly sleep or eat, just spend all my time reading them.
I also loved the Little House series. These stories are so wonderful, reminiscent of a time when things were so much simpler.

I have been thinking about how school does make a student sometimes not like classics. However, what books should teachers recommend students read, if not the books of all time? This is not a rhetorical question, as I really wonder the answer to this question.

I've often pondered this. The conclusion I think I have come to is that books are simply not suitable as an academic exercise. As art, they are as susceptible to taste as, say, a Picasso or a Rodin and need an equivalent approach. No-one, surely, would dream of offering a critique of 'Guernica' without first learning a little about Basque resistance in the Spanish Civil War. So it must be that 'Hard Times' is viewed very much as the outcome of a history lesson, or series of lessons focusing on social conditions in the England of the Industrial revolution. So few schools co-ordinate in that way, and very little social history is taught for that period; yet most 'classical' literature revolves around it, from 'Vanity Fair' to 'The Mill on the Floss'. How much background is needed to arouse interest in 'Julius Caesar'? Not only something of our balding little general's exploits, but also a savor of Shakespeare's London at the time the play was written.
I know good teaching can remedy much of this, but the choice of works will often militate against anything that can be done in class. Personally, I believe the safest course is to discard any title over fifty years old. We have enough richness in our modern literature: classics should be left until at least University level, when the reader can approach them on a more informed basis.




Very interesting, and gratifying to know that someone out there is prepared to experiment with things that might otherwise be thought 'set in stone'. I believe, in English schools anyway, that history tends to be trivialized and limited to political considerations in the face of the ever-increasing demands of curriculum. A shame.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Name of the Rose (other topics)The Secret Garden (other topics)
The Book of Virtues (other topics)
Germinal (other topics)
The Pianist: The Extraordinary Story of One Man's Survival in Warsaw, 1939–45 (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Frances Hodgson Burnett (other topics)Sinclair Lewis (other topics)