IPS, 4th & 8th period discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
5th Six Weeks
>
Week 7
date
newest »



The book is using a third person narrative. it makes it seem like a video game where you see the events around the character and not know what will happen.

![Mireya Garcia-Belman :] | 11 comments](https://s.gr-assets.com/assets/nophoto/user/u_25x33-ccd24e68f4773d33a41ce08c3a34892e.png)
My book is in first person narrative. It explains what she is thinking and what is going through her mind while she is with Micheal. It affects the way you interpret the book by either agreeing with the character or disagreeing, as well as knowing what they feel.

Jade, the narrator of the book is very informative, entertaining. Her narrating helped me to keep up with the story and to understand what was going on.

Zoey is the narrator of the book as also the main character in the story. She explains everything in the book clearly, from beginning too end. Even in the next books, she explains what she had said before that she had never said in the current book.

The narrator of my book is in third person. It describes the environment, what the people are doing, and what the people look like.

Two Steps Ahead of the Thought Police/John Leo
The narrator is typically trying to go for unbiased. His views and opinions come through every now and then but he tries to put up a "no side" front.
The narrator is typically trying to go for unbiased. His views and opinions come through every now and then but he tries to put up a "no side" front.

What kind of narrator is the book using? (unreliable, omniscient, etc.) How does that effect
the way you interpret and understand the book?
Its off a one person basis, and its better this way because it would be very confusing coming from any one else's perspective

The narrator of the story is the girl with a pearl earring, in Vameer's most famous painting, she is strong willed and very private. Her view of things is honest, and somewhat innocent, with this outlook it makes the book much believable because in the painting the woman looks beautiful but innocent, with her wide innocent eyes.

by Wahida Clark
The book is made up of many characters who narrate their own story and point of view of whats happening in the book. Its actually a better interpretation because the words are coming from that person and you know what happened because their telling you.


The narrator is the first person, john is talking about the experiences he had and what he is going trough while hi is in camp where it is snowing and has no other choice but to stay outside and guard.


The book is from a first person point of view. Zoey is the main character and is talking about her life at her new school and how she has to deal with becoming a vampire. Its going through the story of how it actually happened. I believe that the way the book is written is the way it would be best understood. If it was from any other point, you really wouldn't understand the story or how the school works.


Sam Shepard
the narrator is unreliable i sometimes have to go back an read through the chapter to a clearer understanding.

Brian Floca
The narrator is using first person. It's coming from a mouses point of view. This lets me view the book as a mouse.


The story of the book is told by a wife and four daughters. It has much imagery and has many points to look at, its not difficult to understand, it just needs much attention. When the mother speaks, she speaks elegant, but when one of the children speaks its easy to see from what kind of perspective im looking at.

The narrator is using mostly a 3rd person. This allows us to see all of what is going around not just with our character is doing.

This book has a third person narration, which makes me feel like I'm watching a movie where there are two totally different story lines that some how intertwine to become one suspenseful story. It makes the story much more interesting.

Good Enough is written in third person, limited. This allows me to walk in the main characters shoes and 'feel' everything she feels and sees. So it allows me to connect with the book and really enjoy it.

This novel is written in the first person. The narrator is not omniscient but he is reliable. This gives the reader an intimate knowledge of the narrators life, feelings, and emotions. I feel that this is the most effective perspective the author could have used.

the play is in like 3rd person. you hear the story from the outside.
(really hard question)
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
What kind of narrator is the book using? (unreliable, omniscient, etc.) How does that effect
the way you interpret and understand the book?