Pulp Magazine Authors and Literature Fans discussion
Common reads
>
Hunt at the Well of Eternity discussion thread
date
newest »


But, I pressed on, and I was ultimately glad I did. The book's an enjoyable enough little adventure, and if you like this sort of thing (as I do), this is the sort of thing you'll like. It's not an overwhelming read, not a real page turner, its characters are all very basic, the writing and plot are workmanlike...but it's fun and I may pick up another Hunt book in the future (though the fact that each book will have a different writer complicates the issue, as the next book could soar way above this one, or be a piece of utter crap).
I'm sad to say I'm not sold on the series the way I'd hoped to be, as I'd hoped it'd be a must-read I could count on for a regular pulp fix.
Tim
www.DocWilde.com


For the May read, you have your choice between Hunt at the Well of Eternity or The Monster Men by Edgar Rice Burroughs. Or both, if you want.


The Monster Men ? is that John Carter book or Tarzan ?
I have only A Princess of Marsh by him.

News stories about Gabriel Hunt have been referencing Indiana Jones more often than Doc Savage, but believe me, this is Doc Savage through and through. The writing style feels almost identical to the early Doc Savage novels, which is basically a good thing if you like that. That writing is a bit clunky to start with -- and I agree with Tim's comment that the hero is boneheaded at times when it comes to action and self-preservation. But once the plot gets going -- which is pretty damn fast -- it clips along at breakneck speed and comes to a satisfying conclusions. None of the twists and turns caught me off-guard, but that's hardly the point here. The hero is likable enough, the overall idea is solid, and with the authors lined up to contribute to the series, it's almost guaranteed to get even better as it goes along. I'd recommend it.




This does, though, tip the scale for me regarding our earlier debate about whether or not to organize our discussion threads into folders. If we had all the threads relating to common reads in one folder, for instance, I wouldn't have missed this one. So, I'm going to organize some folders over the next few days, and I'd suggest we try them out for a month or so. After that, I'll create a poll, and we can all vote on whether or not we want to keep them. The majority will rule, and I can easily remove them if that's what you all decide. Does that sound fair enough?
I started reading this a few minutes ago. The beginning reminded me of the beginning of the Temple of Doom a little.