Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion

This topic is about
The Guilty
Bulletin Board
>
First Guest Post on Bookgoodies
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Gabriel
(new)
-
added it
Aug 07, 2013 06:40AM

reply
|
flag

All action sequences are ultimately the same. In Greek myths, it was a volcano or a lightning bolt and in today's world its a hostage situation or a terrorist threat. But it ultimately doesn't matter. The results are the same: characters scurrying about; grabbing for weapons; racing for shelter or hanging from ledges. Action is abstract; psychology is concrete. Characters make the difference in a reader's interest.
Ultimately --at the end of a book or a movie--no one is going to remember the fussy technical details of the complicated heist or the prison-escape. They remember the last emotional scene before the heist began (such as the gang boss warning his lieutenant not to betray them) or they remember the first emotional scene to arise afterwards (the boss and the lieutenant glaring at each other over the loot).
As humans, we're engineered to key in on facial expression, body language, and emotion because on a primitive level this is how we detect threat.
When you read a lengthy technical manual on structural engineering; what do you remember of it? A series of diagrams makes no real impression on us.
In a book, when an author describes a break-in or a prison escape, that is a rather homogenous stream of information--just like a manual or set of diagrams--but no peaks or valleys on the emotional plane. Its character which makes us keep reading.
There's a lame 'screenwriting guru' out there who insists that what James Bond does; makes him exciting. He says we wouldn't watch Bond for any other reason than the action sequences. Totally wrong; as there are many knock-offs and copycats of James Bond action in dud-movie after dud-movie and they all fail. But its Bond we keep going back to; because of his character. Because he is cool no matter what he is doing.
