Crime, Mysteries & Thrillers discussion

This topic is about
Rules of Prey
Archive - Group Reads
>
Rules of Prey - September 2013
date
newest »


John Sandford is the pseudonym of John Roswell Camp, an American author and journalist. Camp won the Pulitzer Prize in journalism in 1986, and was one of four finalists for the prize in 1980. He also was the winner of the Distinguished Writing Award of the American Society of Newspaper Editors for 1985.
Camp is the author of thirty-one published novels, all of which have appeared, in one format or another, on the New York Times Best-Seller lists. He is also the author of two non-fiction books, one on plastic surgery and one on art. His books have been translated into most European languages, as well as Japanese and Korean. He is the principal sponsor of a major archaeological dig in Israel, and is on the board of directors of the Albright Institute of Archaeological Research.

About the book :
Rules of Prey is the first book of the series about Lucas Davenport, which was published in 1989. The series contains a total of 23 books, the latest work of which is Silken Prey, published in 2013.
Synosis:
The murderer was intelligent. He was a member of the bar. He derived rules based on professional examination of actual cases: Never kill anyone you know. Never have a motive. Never follow a discernible pattern. Never carry a weapon after it has been used. Beware of leaving physical evidence. There were more. He built them into a challenge. He was mad, of course . . .
The killer's name is Louis Vullion, a low-key young attorney who, under the camouflage of normalcy, researches his next female victim until the pressure within him forces him to reach out and "collect" her. Plying his secret craft with the tactics of a games master, he has gripped the Twin Cities in a storm of terror more fierce than any Minnesota winter.
It is after the third murder that Lucas Davenport is called in. It is the opinion of his colleagues that everything about the lieutenant is a little different, and they are right — in the computer games he invents and sells, in the Porsche he drives to work, in the quality of the women he attracts, in his single-minded pursuit of justice. The only member of the department's Office of Special Intelligence, Davenport prefers to work alone, parallel with Homicide, and there is something about this serial killer that he quickly understands. The man who signs himself "maddog" in taunting notes to the police is no textbook sociopath; he has a perverse playfulness that makes him kill for the sheer contest of it. He is a player.
Which means that Davenport will have to put all his mental strength — and physical courage — on the line to learn to think like the killer. For the only way to beat the maddog is at his own hellish game. . .
Now if you have read the book, feel free to come here and talk your mind about everything in the book. Here is my first discussion thread: What do you think about Lucas Davenport?

Lucas seems very gritty and raw, but with a good heart.
The swearing is a bit much for me though.









It's awesome that you got a chance to meet John Sanford! My sister met him too and she got the same opinion as yours about him. :))

Lucas ..."
Yeah, Lucas seems to be an imperfect portrait of a detective but his personality is quite cool.

Agreed! The naming of the killer surely hasn't spoiled anything from the story. And reading from the baddie's perpestive both creeps me out and excites me to the fullest!

Never too late! Btw, the book threads stay open so even when the official period is over, you can still discuss the book :). Join in, Carmen. It is a great book


Have fun reading Carmen. :)

does anyone else find the reaction of Davenport weird to his girlfriend's news? Btw, what a [insert bad word] for putting him into that situation without his consent.



One of the biggest problems I have so far with the book is the author's inconsistency. Sometimes his grammar is so off!

I had a similar reaction to Davenport. Even after finishing the book, the jury was still out on him.



Okay, FINALLY, someone as conflicted and intrigued as I am about Davenport and the book!! I'm glad I read this book and just don't know what to think of this man.





A very common combo in both Hollywood and Broadway.


Just finished #3. Very much better.

After this I will read book two and may re read the rest. Lucas has always been an attractive character, because he held to his principals and was nice to his women friends. It also helps that he is rich and drives a nice car.
I have not finished Rules yet, and so I have just skimmed your comments, not wanting to read a spoiler. I will report back what I think about it when I have concluded. Can't believe it is October already. Where did September go?



As usual please not we discuss all aspects of the books we read - the plots, the characters, the settings and so on - on our discussions threads. Hence the discussion threads will contain spoilers from the start. if you haven't finished the book yet be careful not to read others' posts until the end.
Summary:
The "maddog" murderer who is terrorizing the Twin Cities is two things: insane and extremely intelligent. He kills for the pleasure of it and thoroughly enjoys placing elaborate obstacles to keep police befuddled. Each clever move he makes is another point of pride. But when the brilliant Lieutenant Lucas Davenport--a dedicated cop and a serial killer's worst nightmare--is brought in to take up the investigation, the maddog suddenly has an adversary worthy of his genius.