*~Can't Stop Reading~* discussion

This topic is about
Ender’s Game
Past Reads
>
Ender's Game
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Sunny
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Sep 03, 2013 10:00AM

reply
|
flag

Well I’ve just finished and am happy to say I enjoyed it! I felt the simplicity of the language was easy to follow and wasn’t bogged down with jargon and technical terms that some space themed novels entail. I did feel the ending was a little weak though; after following Ender throughout his troubled journey I was expecting something explosive and shocking, yet I felt as a reader I didn’t really get that.
It will be interesting to hear what others think :)



I love the other books too but many on here slate them for some reason. Do try them though.
I read this a few months ago and loved it. I did have a hard time with the age of the children though.
Well here are some discussion questions to try and bring this back to life. :)
Discussion Questions
(1) Ender's Game is often criticised for the way the children are portrayed. Critics claim that children just don't behave like that. Card responds by saying that as a child he 'never felt that my emotions were somehow less real than adult emotions and desires.' Are the gifted children of the novel portrayed unrealistically?
(2) Why is Alai's affection and friendship so important to Ender?
(3) What is the significance of the way Ender treats Bean?
(4) The children of the Battle School are exploited mercilessly yet the reader feels that this treatment is justified. Are there contemporary examples of child exploitation that could be compared to that of Ender's Game?
(5) There is a comparative lack of female characters in Ender's Game. Does this mean that the novel is really only about 'boys and their toys'?
(6) Is the character of Peter Wiggin believable? Is he meant to be larger than life as a counterpoint to the more grounded and likable Ender?
(7) What is your major criticism of the novel?
(8) In the context of the SF genre, where do Ender's Game and Card stand amongst the greats of the field?
(9) Card states in his introduction that the novel Ender's Game (expanded from the short story) was really just a means to the end of writing Speaker For The Dead. There is a definite shift in tone in the last chapter that is reminiscent of Speaker For The Dead. Does this mean that Ender's Game can't stand on it's own, that the reader must read Speaker For The Dead?
(10) What is the highlight of the novel for you? Which character or scene or philosophical point is most important to you?"
Discussion Questions
(1) Ender's Game is often criticised for the way the children are portrayed. Critics claim that children just don't behave like that. Card responds by saying that as a child he 'never felt that my emotions were somehow less real than adult emotions and desires.' Are the gifted children of the novel portrayed unrealistically?
(2) Why is Alai's affection and friendship so important to Ender?
(3) What is the significance of the way Ender treats Bean?
(4) The children of the Battle School are exploited mercilessly yet the reader feels that this treatment is justified. Are there contemporary examples of child exploitation that could be compared to that of Ender's Game?
(5) There is a comparative lack of female characters in Ender's Game. Does this mean that the novel is really only about 'boys and their toys'?
(6) Is the character of Peter Wiggin believable? Is he meant to be larger than life as a counterpoint to the more grounded and likable Ender?
(7) What is your major criticism of the novel?
(8) In the context of the SF genre, where do Ender's Game and Card stand amongst the greats of the field?
(9) Card states in his introduction that the novel Ender's Game (expanded from the short story) was really just a means to the end of writing Speaker For The Dead. There is a definite shift in tone in the last chapter that is reminiscent of Speaker For The Dead. Does this mean that Ender's Game can't stand on it's own, that the reader must read Speaker For The Dead?
(10) What is the highlight of the novel for you? Which character or scene or philosophical point is most important to you?"
Well I can't remember the novel well enough to address any of the questions fully save (7).
My major criticism is that the author, Scott Card, comes across as slightly patronising or maybe slightly telling. I sensed when I first read it that he had a lot of moralising to do (which his rather ironic considering his own views on anything) which came across a little patronising. I do agree that the children act in a way that doesn't feel real but rather...oddly contrived.
My major criticism is that the author, Scott Card, comes across as slightly patronising or maybe slightly telling. I sensed when I first read it that he had a lot of moralising to do (which his rather ironic considering his own views on anything) which came across a little patronising. I do agree that the children act in a way that doesn't feel real but rather...oddly contrived.

