Read the Movie discussion
General
>
Adaptation - harder than it looks :-)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kim
(new)
Feb 06, 2008 09:19PM

reply
|
flag

I loved the book and movie adaptation of The Princess Bride by William Goldman. I do wonder how much is due to my love of the movie which was a favorite of mine long before I read the book. In any case, as I recall, while the movie couldn't keep everything, it kept the plot intact. And the casting was spot on! I think that can be a crucial, yet often overlooked piece of the puzzle.

In saying that, it's a totally different call to other types of adaptations because, in my opinion, it depends on the simplicity or the complexity of the novel and whether or not it will attract viewers.
We all know that movie-goers are a whole different crowd to your average readers.
Now, Bridge to Terabithia was a simple plotted book compared to say, The Hobbit.
All in all however, I can't wait to get involved in the industry. I would love love love to adapt books into screen one day, produce and direct too. =)

1. The Godfather
2. Silence of the Lambs
3. The Exorcist
4. Charlotte's Web

Some bad adaptations have been:
1. Jaws (they completely left out the sub plot involving the sheriff's wife having an affair)
2. Hannibal (the ending was much better in the film)
3. Pet Sematary (the book was masterful, the film was devastatingly bad)
And a few that I'm on the fence about:
1. Gone With The Wind (so much of the book was internalized emotion. In the film, Scarlett comes off as petty and catty and an opportunist which is all true, but there's far more to her than that)
2. The Wizard of Oz (my favourite movie of all time, but not true to the original in the least. Part of that is due to special effects available in those days)