UK Amazon Kindle Forum discussion
General Chat - anything Goes
>
What do you think of authors 'hitching a ride'?

The few I've read, it really depends on how good the 'unknown' is.
In theory the big name ought to ensure that everything is properly edited and up to scratch because their reputation is on the line as well, but from comments I've seen elsewhere I wouldn't be sure the big name has even seen the book.


But how does it work, if you know?
How do you 'write a book with someone'?

We have no problem with different people writing the words and the music, but we do know that over the years some of these creative teams break up or fade away.
When talking about writers I'd go so far as to suggest that really we should look at writers and ask "How on earth do they work on their own?"
Even then I'd go so far as to suggest that some editors ought to be credited as 'co-writers', especially in a writers earlier works.
Thinking about it, working with another writer might be good, it might impose discipline, accountability and deadlines and stop the writer frittering away the morning on forums when they ought to be out there doing something useful :-)


I believe it works in different ways. Sometimes, the 'unknown' author writes the whole thing and the 'big name' goes through and makes changes etc. Other times, both authors thrash the story out and one writes so much then passes it onto the other author, who reads through, edits and then continues before passing it back. I guess there are lots of other ways too though.

Anyone wanna go halfsies on a book with me?
I've got lots of ideas but no words.
Would mean spending a shed load of time in pubs with me, though...



Here we knew what the publisher wanted. I went away and wrote it.
The Dave got what I'd written, added new entries, changed bits on my entries and suchlike.
Then I got it back and inspired by what he'd written I added bits to my entries and to his.
Then he did the final edits and it went to print.
But a Fantasy Gazetteer is a pretty unique sort of book and ideal for working with someone else on :-)

Mind you I worked on one project where one participant was in Australia and the other in the US :-)

I stopped reading James Patterson once he started writing with other people, at the time I thought it was maybe due to illness or something where he could get the main points down on paper but couldn't write everything to connect it up so got someone else to help (a bit like Terry Pratchett, I suppose) but I don't think that's true for JP.
It should be made more clear who was the larger contributor to the story and not just the most famous name put first.

Exactly what I wanted to say.

But how do you do that with a novel? I just don't get how that can work. No two authors or even readers experience any character exactly the same way nor do any two authors sound exactly the same. Isn't it difficult to get a consistent character perspective and development when more than one person is writing, especially in a novel?

Not sure how it was done though. I think I recall reading something about them alternating chapters or something?

In terms of 'hitching a ride', I don't see a problem. Look at anthologies - I'm a debut pro author in a couple of forthcoming books in which there are significantly more experienced writers contributing. But that's a two-edged sword. Yes, I get exposure from it, but I could also suffer from the contrast if my work isn't up to snuff.
Even in the anthologies produced by this fine forum, there's a huge range of experience. I might not have the sales, profile, or experience of, say, Rosen Trevithick, but I don't think I'm getting a free lunch by being in the same book.
Plus, a decade ago I was in a charity collection with contributions from people including Diane Duane and Paul Cornell - and I can't help noticing I'm still not internationally famous in spite of this...
And yay Patti - writing in pubs is sort of my thing...


Yeah. My thinking too, to be honest.
Like they need more money.
Wonder when we'll see JK doing it.


What's his stuff about?

My paperback edition has a great piece by the authors on how they managed the collaboration.
I seem to remember drinking went on...


The NUMA Files follow a special operations type team from NUMA.
The Oregon Files (which are my favourites but are all cowrote) are about an awesome ship crewed by mercenaries with consciences who usually end up caught up in something bigger!
To be fair to Clive Cussler, he's in his early 80s, still produces books (although I think they're mostly cowrote now) and appears to be fairly active!



Just thinking, it was my Kindle's 3rd birthday last August and it's still going strong!




What's his stuff about?"
A watered down Indiana Jones.

Likewise for me. History books are my preference - the truth is usually better than any fiction.


And because you're drawing from history, no need to worry about the other side pointing a lawyer in your direction. Plot ideas + legal safety = cashback! :)

I'm all for collaboration, but I suppose there will inevitably a disparity between the two writers whichever way it shakes out - either the lesser known one is overwhelmed by the greater known one, or the greater known one really is only there as a gloss not in any meaningful contributory way.

Likewise for me. History books are my preference..."
The devil in me might suggest that history has facts but not truth. 'Truth' is how those facts are interpreted...

I seriously doubt the veracity of the facts too, but I stopped short of dropping that one in...
History graduate see and far from relishing agreeing with anything Henry Ford said, 'History is bunk' bunk written by academic historians making work for themselves


A note about Ringworld: Niven gave a talk to a packed house at M.I.T. once. Before he could begin, the students greeted him with the chant, "The Ringworld is unstable!" He addressed their criticism by adding ramjet stabilizers in the second book.

History graduate see and far from relishing agreeing with anything Henry Ford said, 'History is bunk' bunk written by academic historians making work for themselves ..."
Interesting that what he said is ;-
"History is more or less bunk. It's tradition. We don't want tradition. We want to live in the present, and the only history that is worth a tinker's damn is the history that we make today." (Chicago Tribune, 1916).
The one thing I want people to do when they read my books is not to live in the present. If all they want to do is to live in the present they don't me or pretty well any other writer. We lift them out of THEIR present and give them a brief alternative

History graduate see and far from relishing agreeing with anything Henry Ford said, 'Hi..."
there's is absolutely room in the book market for books that do that and books that only seek to engage with the present. You can probably guess which camp I fall into. I would only ask what is it about our contemporary world that demands for a reader to escape from it into a brief alternative? ;-)

Even if the book is set in the here and now, it's not their here and now, it's a here and now they can only reach through the pages of your book.
But basically most people need escape. I know that when I've gone through periods of serious stress my reading habits changed. Indeed during the 2001 Foot and Mouth epidemic I ended up re-reading all my Astrix books. We offer them an escape into a world that they want. If they don't like what I offer, then it's a version of here and now that they don't need to enter. If they get so far into it and don't like it, they can walk away.
We give them the romance, or the tension, or the relaxation; or the stress that they seek. We give them a chance to stretch their imagination, to explore worlds that they don't know, be it the Land of the Three Seas or Liverpool in 2013. (Remember that for many people Liverpool is just a name, it's like New York or Samarkand, it's not necessarily a real place.
(As an aside I did blog about the unreality of the real a while back, http://jandbvwebster.wordpress.com/20... )
Books mentioned in this topic
Ringworld (other topics)Garrison Life at Vindolanda: A Band of Brothers (other topics)
Good Omens: The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, Witch (other topics)
The Scaum Valley Gazetteer (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Larry Niven (other topics)Jerry Pournelle (other topics)
Edward M. Lerner (other topics)
Rosen Trevithick (other topics)
I'm referring to unknown authors collaborating with big name authors. The most recent I've noticed is Stephen King.
I'm leery of reading these books. I expect it's all marketing and the books won't be of the quality I want.
What do you think?