Indie Book Club discussion
Book of the Month Fantasy
>
November Fantasy BotM: The Shining Citadel
date
newest »


Anyone who wants the SW version a half price voucher is available on this code LD57
https://www.smashwords.com/books/view...
Oh yay! I almost forgot about this. I've read this book. I can participate in discussion and do Nano...I think. :)
Uh... maybe. I am a mod, but I'm not quite sure how to do that (which is why it hasn't been done for the Other category either).
I'll have a furkle and see what I can find.
Edited extra bit: ah ha! I've got it up. Now I need to take down Altmortis and put up Paw-Prints... [I'm remarkably deficient at technical things, so this may take a little while].
I'll have a furkle and see what I can find.
Edited extra bit: ah ha! I've got it up. Now I need to take down Altmortis and put up Paw-Prints... [I'm remarkably deficient at technical things, so this may take a little while].

It's on my Kindle but I haven't started it yet. Unfortunately I wanted to read both this and Paw Prints (Other Book of the Month), and the first week or two of this month was occupied with getting stuff released and finishing off a work in progress. Decided to read Paw Prints as I'd just read the first book of the Light Beyond the Storm Chronicles.
Actually, that may present an interesting point of comparison when I do read this book. Paw Prints is a sort-of follow up to a previous book, and obviously The Shining Citadel is the second in a series, so it could be useful to compare and contrast how easy (or not) it is to jump in mid-series.
Actually, that may present an interesting point of comparison when I do read this book. Paw Prints is a sort-of follow up to a previous book, and obviously The Shining Citadel is the second in a series, so it could be useful to compare and contrast how easy (or not) it is to jump in mid-series.
I have read the book previously. I am attempting to participate in NaNoWriMo this month, so I'm not doing a whole lot of reading currently.
I am up for chatting over what I remember of the story and characters if anyone likes that sort of discussion. :)
I am up for chatting over what I remember of the story and characters if anyone likes that sort of discussion. :)

There is some background info which it is helpful to know and which is refered to but as this is a story in its own right then you should be OK.
I am not reading Paw-prints as I have some books to read for a course, a ton of writing and other personal stuff going on. This will still be here next month and I've noticed the chat sometimes drags over.



Glad you are enjoying it.
Just started this. Not read enough to comment beyond that, except to say the writing style seems slightly improved from the first book.
Something like 20% in now.
I think it was a wise decision to make Marden and Th'alia the focus (at least at the start). Works well, and I imagine that'd be the case if I hadn't read the first book.
Interesting choice to add some moral ambiguity. The first book was very black and white (I know that isn't in fashion now, but I don't mind black and white morality so long as it's clearly intended).
I think it was a wise decision to make Marden and Th'alia the focus (at least at the start). Works well, and I imagine that'd be the case if I hadn't read the first book.
Interesting choice to add some moral ambiguity. The first book was very black and white (I know that isn't in fashion now, but I don't mind black and white morality so long as it's clearly intended).

Interesting that you see Book 1 as black and white, as I don't - there are good guys and bad guys but the "good guys" kill, steal, lie and what-have-you. Of course if you are the good guys that is ok;) That is one of the many things I love about a story, different people see different things in the same story.
That's true, but the theft/murdering is always for a noble cause, like Robin Hood.
I can't imagine Archos deliberately choosing to be evil, whereas Marden I could see doing good or bad things.
I can't imagine Archos deliberately choosing to be evil, whereas Marden I could see doing good or bad things.

Oddly, I always thought Alex's world was more shades of gray. Archos is decidedly good to his people, but he is still sort of a crime lord and his people are thieves, assassins, elves (in a land where they are slaves) and mages (in a land where magic is banned).
I love a world where an anti-hero is the good guy and the ruling power is decidedly evil. I so hope there's an uprising in the future :)
I love a world where an anti-hero is the good guy and the ruling power is decidedly evil. I so hope there's an uprising in the future :)
He could be considered a crime lord, but when the laws are evil then a crime lord can be a good guy.

The history is the Witch-hunters have ruled for 300 or so years, and what was done in fear and trying to protect the common people has now become corrupted. A lie told often enough becomes a form of truth. Ignorance and fear mean people do not question the status quo, and so it persists.
About 70% in now.
I like the way the storyline's going and the balance of it so far. Sometimes I think ideas are a little bit laboured (just read a bit about Marden's thoughts and he seemed to repeat himself a little).
I like the trolls/hraks, and think it was a good idea not to refer back to Malia too much.
I like the way the storyline's going and the balance of it so far. Sometimes I think ideas are a little bit laboured (just read a bit about Marden's thoughts and he seemed to repeat himself a little).
I like the trolls/hraks, and think it was a good idea not to refer back to Malia too much.

I like the trolls too, they are fun. They'll appear again in Book III:)
hehe, I'm odd, I like Marden myself, and I LOVE the trolls. :)



Just finished this today. Would've done so yesterday but my Kindle's battery needed recharging.
I liked the battle scene, and the storyline twist at the end. I think the detail (I felt it was excessive in the previous book) was better, although there was sometimes repetition/labouring the point.
The pace of the book was well-judged, and I liked the storyline. Sometimes I felt the dialogue was a little unnatural, lacking some informality/subtlety.
Not sure at the moment what rating I'll give it. I'll write the review in the nearish future.
I liked the battle scene, and the storyline twist at the end. I think the detail (I felt it was excessive in the previous book) was better, although there was sometimes repetition/labouring the point.
The pace of the book was well-judged, and I liked the storyline. Sometimes I felt the dialogue was a little unnatural, lacking some informality/subtlety.
Not sure at the moment what rating I'll give it. I'll write the review in the nearish future.

Enjoy the discussion everyone!