SA Book & Challenge Lovers discussion

This topic is about
Collapse
All Book Discussions
>
Collapse by Jared Diamond
Chapter 1 (and prologue).
Thanks Lu, for finally getting me to read this book. It's been lurking in my bookshelf for ages. Once I read the prologue, I realised I had seen some of these collapsed societies (although not ones discussed in the book) over the years. I've had the privilege of visiting Sri Lanka's Ancient Cities which are like those romantic lost cities in the rain forest that he describes (the Rain Forest just looks a bit more like Limpopo). I also visited Fatehpur Sikri near Agra in India last year which supported a larger population than London in the 16th century and was subsequently abandoned (probably due to a lack of water).
The nice part of Montana is that one can visualise the scenery - having watched "A River runs through it". I have the book lurking around here somewhere - it's beautifully written.
The part that particularly resonated with me was the section on p58 and onwards on the agricultural industry. There are a large number of parallels to the South African industry (bear with me, I spent 10 years financing farmers until last year).
Similar to Montana, the South African farming population is ageing, the majority of farmers are over 45 and many children are choosing not to follow their parents. Land being the farmer's pension in South Africa as well, the farms are sold to other land uses and/or to other farmers.
The land price issue is also present in various forms. In Mpumalanga (our best agricultural land), farmers can no longer compete with mines on land prices resulting in much prime agricultural land being given over to mining. Similar to Montana, the side effects of the mining is being felt by agriculture in terms of lower water quality, air pollution, less water available etc. And similar to Montana, there is no constructive effort to manage the competing requirements of agriculture and mining. We don't have comparable agricultural land in terms of productivity in South Africa, so this is a problem.
The result is that farmers are driven out of the province to farm more marginal land elsewhere. South Africa is one of those countries scheduled to get warmer with climate change, so the marginal lands will only be available for a limited time.
In terms of the farmers being unable to compete with rich out-of-towners, that effect is seen in places like Limpopo and Eastern Cape. In our case, farms which have traditionally been used for cattle farming is being bought up and turned into nature reserves with 5 star lodges. I think that is a fairly benign outcome since the lodges probably provide more employment opportunities than the cattle farms and it actually returns the land to its original purpose, but it means we have less extensive cattle farming. (which means more feedlots, with higher overall energy consumption to produce the same volume of beef).
Similarly South African farmers are faced with costs increasing faster than commodity prices. So you have farmers being more effective (average yields of South African maize has increased by at least a third over the past 15 years), but it is accompanied by higher use of fertilizer, etc and more capital intensive. We've lost 500,000 employment opportunities in agriculture over the past 10 years.
He also mentions in the prologue the effect of long term weather cycles. In South Africa we are now moving from a 20 year "wet" cycle to a traditionally 20 year "dry" cycle. Those human memories are important that he mentions. During the recent wetter years, farmers started planting maize at higher densities in North West and experimenting with "Mpumalanga" cultivars. During the first real dry season two years ago, the farmers who still planted at lower densities had higher overall yields in the province.
I am looking forward to the next section.
Thanks Lu, for finally getting me to read this book. It's been lurking in my bookshelf for ages. Once I read the prologue, I realised I had seen some of these collapsed societies (although not ones discussed in the book) over the years. I've had the privilege of visiting Sri Lanka's Ancient Cities which are like those romantic lost cities in the rain forest that he describes (the Rain Forest just looks a bit more like Limpopo). I also visited Fatehpur Sikri near Agra in India last year which supported a larger population than London in the 16th century and was subsequently abandoned (probably due to a lack of water).
The nice part of Montana is that one can visualise the scenery - having watched "A River runs through it". I have the book lurking around here somewhere - it's beautifully written.
The part that particularly resonated with me was the section on p58 and onwards on the agricultural industry. There are a large number of parallels to the South African industry (bear with me, I spent 10 years financing farmers until last year).
Similar to Montana, the South African farming population is ageing, the majority of farmers are over 45 and many children are choosing not to follow their parents. Land being the farmer's pension in South Africa as well, the farms are sold to other land uses and/or to other farmers.
The land price issue is also present in various forms. In Mpumalanga (our best agricultural land), farmers can no longer compete with mines on land prices resulting in much prime agricultural land being given over to mining. Similar to Montana, the side effects of the mining is being felt by agriculture in terms of lower water quality, air pollution, less water available etc. And similar to Montana, there is no constructive effort to manage the competing requirements of agriculture and mining. We don't have comparable agricultural land in terms of productivity in South Africa, so this is a problem.
The result is that farmers are driven out of the province to farm more marginal land elsewhere. South Africa is one of those countries scheduled to get warmer with climate change, so the marginal lands will only be available for a limited time.
In terms of the farmers being unable to compete with rich out-of-towners, that effect is seen in places like Limpopo and Eastern Cape. In our case, farms which have traditionally been used for cattle farming is being bought up and turned into nature reserves with 5 star lodges. I think that is a fairly benign outcome since the lodges probably provide more employment opportunities than the cattle farms and it actually returns the land to its original purpose, but it means we have less extensive cattle farming. (which means more feedlots, with higher overall energy consumption to produce the same volume of beef).
Similarly South African farmers are faced with costs increasing faster than commodity prices. So you have farmers being more effective (average yields of South African maize has increased by at least a third over the past 15 years), but it is accompanied by higher use of fertilizer, etc and more capital intensive. We've lost 500,000 employment opportunities in agriculture over the past 10 years.
He also mentions in the prologue the effect of long term weather cycles. In South Africa we are now moving from a 20 year "wet" cycle to a traditionally 20 year "dry" cycle. Those human memories are important that he mentions. During the recent wetter years, farmers started planting maize at higher densities in North West and experimenting with "Mpumalanga" cultivars. During the first real dry season two years ago, the farmers who still planted at lower densities had higher overall yields in the province.
I am looking forward to the next section.
Here's two links you may enjoy (one an old interview and the second one is recent):
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/144fa8...
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/1f7866...
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/144fa8...
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/1f7866...
Chapter 1:
I really enjoyed the case study of Montana. I also found the agricultural situation very interesting, as it has bearing on my study area. The societies that I look at also had agricultural problems with soil losing nutrients and over-cultivation of land.
The Climate - South Africa was affected by a "Little Ice Age" in the Middle Iron Age and a bit beyond (thus 1300 - 1750). And as I study this time period I find the effects of climate very interesting.
This Little Ice Age is seen as a contributing factor of the decline of 2 great civilizations in southern Africa (Mapungubwe and Great Zimbabwe). A lot about the effects and when climatic cooling actually affected the Iron Age is still debated. But we do see these societies moving to different climates as they just couldn't sustain their populations anymore.
What you are saying about our current weather cycle's is very interesting! I am sometimes so focused in the past that I forget we are having similar problems today.
I really enjoyed the case study of Montana. I also found the agricultural situation very interesting, as it has bearing on my study area. The societies that I look at also had agricultural problems with soil losing nutrients and over-cultivation of land.
The Climate - South Africa was affected by a "Little Ice Age" in the Middle Iron Age and a bit beyond (thus 1300 - 1750). And as I study this time period I find the effects of climate very interesting.
This Little Ice Age is seen as a contributing factor of the decline of 2 great civilizations in southern Africa (Mapungubwe and Great Zimbabwe). A lot about the effects and when climatic cooling actually affected the Iron Age is still debated. But we do see these societies moving to different climates as they just couldn't sustain their populations anymore.
What you are saying about our current weather cycle's is very interesting! I am sometimes so focused in the past that I forget we are having similar problems today.
I listened to an interview by Jenny Crys-Williams with Zakes Mda on the book during the week and his research sounded fascinating - a combination of the archaeological findings to date, interviews with tribal elders who still know oral stories and songs about it and some artefacts in overseas museums. Pieces have pitched up all over the world mainly via Arab traders of 1000 years ago as far as I understand it. It's definitely on my TBR list.
I might have to check it out then! But just like historic movies, if I know a bit about the topic I cringe at inaccuracies. There is a reason I have never watched Troy, Gladiator, 10000 BC etc. lol
Well, it's supposed to be fiction, but I know what you mean. I get annoyed whenever I read any investment banker's opinion on agriculture. OK, so le's get cracking on Easter Island.
I read the first 50 pages yesterday. I will aim at 50 pages a day. I read your comments before I read the book and I think this is going to be an interesting discussion because of the different perspectives we come from. I have a Zoology background so we focused on wild not domesticated animals.
I don't have anything major to add from the first chapter of the book but the comments about farming were really interesting. I love the fact that the Eastern Cape has gone toward the game farm idea instead of domestic animals. It is so much better for the land to support animals that were historically there and there is an added benefit of the eco tourism side. The fact that it means game is easily available to eat instead of beef makes me very happy as well.
Of course, there are challenges behind the change but the ones I think about are the fact that you need to be careful to introduce only animals which historically occurred there or you can have problems (savannah warthog is a menace in the area as it is different to the extinct cape warthog). I used to be very anti hunting until I befriended a hunter and had done good deep chats about it. I think now that it can be a good thing as long as it is managed properly.
I don't have anything major to add from the first chapter of the book but the comments about farming were really interesting. I love the fact that the Eastern Cape has gone toward the game farm idea instead of domestic animals. It is so much better for the land to support animals that were historically there and there is an added benefit of the eco tourism side. The fact that it means game is easily available to eat instead of beef makes me very happy as well.
Of course, there are challenges behind the change but the ones I think about are the fact that you need to be careful to introduce only animals which historically occurred there or you can have problems (savannah warthog is a menace in the area as it is different to the extinct cape warthog). I used to be very anti hunting until I befriended a hunter and had done good deep chats about it. I think now that it can be a good thing as long as it is managed properly.
Oh, it doesn't have to be fiction for me to get annoyed. I can't watch anyone who is supposedly a snake handler and has a TV show. I know that there are times when they would rather not do something but the director calls the shots, but I still don't support that kind of interaction with deadly animals. Give me Attenborough style any day.
Chapter 2:
Although I know of Easter Island, I really didn't know much about it other than that it had these big statues. (And my most recent interaction with those were confined to a TV programmes on CBeebies called Zingzillas which my daughters watch).
So I found the chapter very interesting. I was under the impression that there were no people living on the island at all, and learnt that there are actually a local population. I was fascinated by the description of the stone chicken houses and the theories on how the statues were moved etc.
His final comment about the Earth being so remote from any other planet and therefore being in a similar situation to Easter Island although on a more cosmic scale really made an impression on me.
He discussed the various theories on whether the population originated from South America or Polynesia. There is a section devoted to it in The Seven Daughters of Eve: The Science That Reveals Our Genetic Ancestry where they describe how mitochondrial DNA was used to track the various ancestors on those islands and I think determine the settlement pattern. My mother has our shared copy of the book, so I wasn't able to verify my memory accurately. That's another great book to read, by the way.
Although I know of Easter Island, I really didn't know much about it other than that it had these big statues. (And my most recent interaction with those were confined to a TV programmes on CBeebies called Zingzillas which my daughters watch).
So I found the chapter very interesting. I was under the impression that there were no people living on the island at all, and learnt that there are actually a local population. I was fascinated by the description of the stone chicken houses and the theories on how the statues were moved etc.
His final comment about the Earth being so remote from any other planet and therefore being in a similar situation to Easter Island although on a more cosmic scale really made an impression on me.
He discussed the various theories on whether the population originated from South America or Polynesia. There is a section devoted to it in The Seven Daughters of Eve: The Science That Reveals Our Genetic Ancestry where they describe how mitochondrial DNA was used to track the various ancestors on those islands and I think determine the settlement pattern. My mother has our shared copy of the book, so I wasn't able to verify my memory accurately. That's another great book to read, by the way.
Reading about water quality in Montana and I just have to add my thoughts to the discussion. Firstly, I get so frustrated when there are water restrictions on due to a drought and everyone is happy using as much borehole water as they like. That is coming from the same source as the water from the dams in the long run.
Secondly it makes me sad to remember that the Redhouse River Mile which is the oldest Mile swim in the country is now swum in the Sundays River because the water at Redhouse is too toxic. The guys at the Aquarium tell me that I don't want to get access to their data or I would very quickly so my ocean swims.
Lastly I am just frustrated by how politics work. The people who ultimately make the decisions actually don't know what they are talking about. They claim to get info from scientists but I'm pretty sure they don't understand much of it. I work in the public sector so I have first hand knowledge of this. Our director was basically forced out by the unions. We got a replacement for a year ago had been deputy director with us a few years back before moving to another museum. He refused to stay after the year so they set us this guy who was apparently great because in his numerous years in the department he had worked in most of the sections. Head Office officials could not see that by staying in one section you can become an expert in that area. Instead we got someone who knows little to nothing about museums who must manage a large understaffed museum which incorporates two specialist zoos. Even for someone with museum experience that's a huge job. He is doing the best he can but the fact that he is all they could give us is unacceptable.
Secondly it makes me sad to remember that the Redhouse River Mile which is the oldest Mile swim in the country is now swum in the Sundays River because the water at Redhouse is too toxic. The guys at the Aquarium tell me that I don't want to get access to their data or I would very quickly so my ocean swims.
Lastly I am just frustrated by how politics work. The people who ultimately make the decisions actually don't know what they are talking about. They claim to get info from scientists but I'm pretty sure they don't understand much of it. I work in the public sector so I have first hand knowledge of this. Our director was basically forced out by the unions. We got a replacement for a year ago had been deputy director with us a few years back before moving to another museum. He refused to stay after the year so they set us this guy who was apparently great because in his numerous years in the department he had worked in most of the sections. Head Office officials could not see that by staying in one section you can become an expert in that area. Instead we got someone who knows little to nothing about museums who must manage a large understaffed museum which incorporates two specialist zoos. Even for someone with museum experience that's a huge job. He is doing the best he can but the fact that he is all they could give us is unacceptable.
Varla Fiona wrote: "Reading about water quality in Montana and I just have to add my thoughts to the discussion. Firstly, I get so frustrated when there are water restrictions on due to a drought and everyone is happ..."
I think the other problem with science and politicians stem from the fact that on some subjects there is just too much information and some of it will be contradictory. So unless you are actually a scientist by trade or you have some system to identify the really important stuff, you get information overload and eventually nothing gets done, because all the piles of evidence are debated, but nobody has the ability to make a decision. It's not limited to politicians and definitely not to South African ones.
A few years ago, some Scandinavian scientist did an exercise on global warming where they did the cost-benefit analysis on some of the main causes and potential actions basically to be able to point politicians in a direction, because so few decisions were made. And even when decisions are made, the side effects may not always be understood.
I think the other problem with science and politicians stem from the fact that on some subjects there is just too much information and some of it will be contradictory. So unless you are actually a scientist by trade or you have some system to identify the really important stuff, you get information overload and eventually nothing gets done, because all the piles of evidence are debated, but nobody has the ability to make a decision. It's not limited to politicians and definitely not to South African ones.
A few years ago, some Scandinavian scientist did an exercise on global warming where they did the cost-benefit analysis on some of the main causes and potential actions basically to be able to point politicians in a direction, because so few decisions were made. And even when decisions are made, the side effects may not always be understood.
Chapter 3:
My knowledge of Pitcairn is limited to my (very limited) knowledge of Mutiny on the Bounty and that pretty much consists of having seen the tomb of Captain Bligh in the churchyard in London - the church is now the Museum of Garden History.
I found he descriptions of the intra-island trade very interesting and the whole process that they use to compare stuff across islands to decide the origin thereof. We tend to think that trade is a modern invention dependent on modern transport and logistics, but it has been around for centuries.
On the other hand, the chapter reminded me that Nation is one of my favourite Pratchett's and I haven't read it in ages. So many books to read...
My knowledge of Pitcairn is limited to my (very limited) knowledge of Mutiny on the Bounty and that pretty much consists of having seen the tomb of Captain Bligh in the churchyard in London - the church is now the Museum of Garden History.
I found he descriptions of the intra-island trade very interesting and the whole process that they use to compare stuff across islands to decide the origin thereof. We tend to think that trade is a modern invention dependent on modern transport and logistics, but it has been around for centuries.
On the other hand, the chapter reminded me that Nation is one of my favourite Pratchett's and I haven't read it in ages. So many books to read...
Chapter 4:
This was all new to me. I've read references to the settlements in books over the years (mostly just as landscape descriptions), so I found this very interesting. I would love to know if there is some animals that leave similar middens than the packrats in Southern Africa for you to use in your work, Lu.
This was all new to me. I've read references to the settlements in books over the years (mostly just as landscape descriptions), so I found this very interesting. I would love to know if there is some animals that leave similar middens than the packrats in Southern Africa for you to use in your work, Lu.
Chapter 2:
I was amazed at how many statues there were! I thought there were only like 6 or something. I knew nothing about the island, so it was really fascinating!
What fascinated me was the zooarchaeology side! So many dolphin bones! I want to dig there! :)
PS: Slowly getting back into things, but I fear the next few days might be busy :(
I was amazed at how many statues there were! I thought there were only like 6 or something. I knew nothing about the island, so it was really fascinating!
What fascinated me was the zooarchaeology side! So many dolphin bones! I want to dig there! :)
PS: Slowly getting back into things, but I fear the next few days might be busy :(
I agree, I also thought it was only a few, but the descriptions completely changed my perspective. You are going to have to explain zooarcheology to me - sound fascinating.
Chapter 5:
Again, I knew that the Mayas existed in South America, but was very vague about the details. The nice part of this chapter to me was that it grounded them for me in a specific area. The similarities with Easter Island in terms of temples and statues playing a major role and using up so much resources are striking. (of course, not much changed since then - we call it Nkandla...) In all the chapters I find the descriptions of the farming techniques interesting, but don't need to explain the details.
I am aiming to read a chapter a day, because I don't have a big chunk of time coming up to read a large part of the book in one sitting. At least I am maintaining momentum now. When is you exam, Lu?
Again, I knew that the Mayas existed in South America, but was very vague about the details. The nice part of this chapter to me was that it grounded them for me in a specific area. The similarities with Easter Island in terms of temples and statues playing a major role and using up so much resources are striking. (of course, not much changed since then - we call it Nkandla...) In all the chapters I find the descriptions of the farming techniques interesting, but don't need to explain the details.
I am aiming to read a chapter a day, because I don't have a big chunk of time coming up to read a large part of the book in one sitting. At least I am maintaining momentum now. When is you exam, Lu?
Thought I'd post some modern day travel articles on Greenland and Iceland for Chapter 6. They have some nice pictures.
Greenland
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/44d054...
Driving around modern day Iceland
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/514062...
Greenland
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/44d054...
Driving around modern day Iceland
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/514062...
Carolien wrote: "I agree, I also thought it was only a few, but the descriptions completely changed my perspective. You are going to have to explain zooarcheology to me - sound fascinating."
It is what I specialize in :) Basically it is an archaeologist that looks at animal remains and identifies them. So I look at tons of tiny bones and give it size, specie, sex etc.
zooarchaeologists also look at food distribution patterns, animal products, anything to do with animal remains that you can think of!
I focus on domesticates in the last 2 thousand years or so. My thesis is on the importance of goats and sheep compared to cattle, as well as quantification methods of bones and if they can be compared etc. (A LONG story lol)
It is what I specialize in :) Basically it is an archaeologist that looks at animal remains and identifies them. So I look at tons of tiny bones and give it size, specie, sex etc.
zooarchaeologists also look at food distribution patterns, animal products, anything to do with animal remains that you can think of!
I focus on domesticates in the last 2 thousand years or so. My thesis is on the importance of goats and sheep compared to cattle, as well as quantification methods of bones and if they can be compared etc. (A LONG story lol)
Chapter 6,7,8
That sounds so interesting! Well then you would be quite qualified for the Norse part of the societies. Quite a bit is devoted to why cattle was unsuitable for the Iceland and Greenland climates, how they became status symbols and how sheep took over as main livestock species and how they deduct this via the bones.
I finished the section on the Norse societies. In general I find it fascinating how the different specialist areas- pollen/zooarchaeologists/anthropologists/climatologist etc all contribute to increase the overall understanding of these societies and places.
I've known about the Orkney islands Norse background and I've known that the Norse discovered America before Columbus. It was interesting to understand why the Norse society in North America didn't survive long enough to claim that massive landmass for themselves. (Think of the alternate history one can write about that one!)
The descriptions of live in Iceland and Greenland made me think of the quote that life is "Brutal and short and then you die". It must have been such a hard live to survive those conditions - one continuous slog to ensure that every task that needs to be done to survive gets done on the right time. There won't second chances.
Iceland merits a comment on the fact that, having managed to contain their environmental issues, and improving their quality of life over time, they then nearly destroyed their economy in the 2008 financial crisis through a combination of greed and mismanagement. If you are interested, here's the best summary I ever read on that subject: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/fe...
Finally, the description of the Inuit and how their adaptions to life in Greenland and the technology they used allowed them to survive was fascinating. I must say, it sounds like the Norse really were quite a grumpy bunch!
That sounds so interesting! Well then you would be quite qualified for the Norse part of the societies. Quite a bit is devoted to why cattle was unsuitable for the Iceland and Greenland climates, how they became status symbols and how sheep took over as main livestock species and how they deduct this via the bones.
I finished the section on the Norse societies. In general I find it fascinating how the different specialist areas- pollen/zooarchaeologists/anthropologists/climatologist etc all contribute to increase the overall understanding of these societies and places.
I've known about the Orkney islands Norse background and I've known that the Norse discovered America before Columbus. It was interesting to understand why the Norse society in North America didn't survive long enough to claim that massive landmass for themselves. (Think of the alternate history one can write about that one!)
The descriptions of live in Iceland and Greenland made me think of the quote that life is "Brutal and short and then you die". It must have been such a hard live to survive those conditions - one continuous slog to ensure that every task that needs to be done to survive gets done on the right time. There won't second chances.
Iceland merits a comment on the fact that, having managed to contain their environmental issues, and improving their quality of life over time, they then nearly destroyed their economy in the 2008 financial crisis through a combination of greed and mismanagement. If you are interested, here's the best summary I ever read on that subject: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/fe...
Finally, the description of the Inuit and how their adaptions to life in Greenland and the technology they used allowed them to survive was fascinating. I must say, it sounds like the Norse really were quite a grumpy bunch!
Chapter 9
The one thing this book does test/expand is my geography knowledge (and I had it as a matric subject). I didn't know Tikopia existed, but would love to see it after reading the book - it sounds like a kind of Hanging Gardens/Eden in the Pacific ocean. I'd love to see the result of the very detailed inter planting of trees that they have on the island.
New Guinea is better known, but more famous on the cannibalism aspect than the agricultural practises that are described here. I agree with the comments that colonialists hugely under estimated the complexity of some of the existing agricultural practises in many locations of the world and that it has taken decades for some of that knowledge to filter into the global knowledge base.
The section on how Japan dealt with its environmental challenges is interesting and it is indicative that you do not need a modern society with modern tools to be able to implement changes and improve management practises. I think very often people think that you need complex tools (and a lot of workshops/meeting, etc) to solve some of the problems, when some very basic tools would work. (Google maps is just very convenient to add to that tool set etc).
Japan is also interesting in that it solved some local issues, but created some international problems in the process - whaling being prominent. It is indicative of how integrated some of the natural systems are and how solving one problem may have unexpected consequences.
Agricultural contributes a very small part of Japan's GDP these days, but it is one of the most subsidised sectors in the world economy (which rather wants to be done). Rural voters also have a disproportional say in government in Japan.
The one thing this book does test/expand is my geography knowledge (and I had it as a matric subject). I didn't know Tikopia existed, but would love to see it after reading the book - it sounds like a kind of Hanging Gardens/Eden in the Pacific ocean. I'd love to see the result of the very detailed inter planting of trees that they have on the island.
New Guinea is better known, but more famous on the cannibalism aspect than the agricultural practises that are described here. I agree with the comments that colonialists hugely under estimated the complexity of some of the existing agricultural practises in many locations of the world and that it has taken decades for some of that knowledge to filter into the global knowledge base.
The section on how Japan dealt with its environmental challenges is interesting and it is indicative that you do not need a modern society with modern tools to be able to implement changes and improve management practises. I think very often people think that you need complex tools (and a lot of workshops/meeting, etc) to solve some of the problems, when some very basic tools would work. (Google maps is just very convenient to add to that tool set etc).
Japan is also interesting in that it solved some local issues, but created some international problems in the process - whaling being prominent. It is indicative of how integrated some of the natural systems are and how solving one problem may have unexpected consequences.
Agricultural contributes a very small part of Japan's GDP these days, but it is one of the most subsidised sectors in the world economy (which rather wants to be done). Rural voters also have a disproportional say in government in Japan.
Sorry this is such a one-sided convo Carolien! I will get back to this asap hopefully :) Things have been a bit crazy :(
I'm more worried that you will get reading with a vengeance at some stage and I won't be able to keep up!
While studying I sometimes get into a bit of a reading slump :(
Chapter 3:
I really liked this chapter! All the archaeology is fascinating! All those bones, what I wouldn't do to analyze them. And then the chemical analysis was very interesting and how they tied it all together.
I would be TERRIFIED to go in one of those canoes. Can you imagine traveling for days on end in a little thing like that?
I find early trade very fascinating, and it is also one of the topics I'm studying for my exam on Thursday.
What I also found interesting is the environmental damage these people were causing. So often I forget that it is just modern day people with all the smoke and pollution, but that ancient societies also managed to impact on their environment the same way.
Chapter 3:
I really liked this chapter! All the archaeology is fascinating! All those bones, what I wouldn't do to analyze them. And then the chemical analysis was very interesting and how they tied it all together.
I would be TERRIFIED to go in one of those canoes. Can you imagine traveling for days on end in a little thing like that?
I find early trade very fascinating, and it is also one of the topics I'm studying for my exam on Thursday.
What I also found interesting is the environmental damage these people were causing. So often I forget that it is just modern day people with all the smoke and pollution, but that ancient societies also managed to impact on their environment the same way.
I agree with you on the canoes. And they weren't the only ones, the Inuit also used canoes in freezing temperatures and then chased whales with them!
Sorry, have been busy. I have reread until end of Chapter 8 so far.
I find the various different stories so interesting and love the way they figure out what probably happened from weird and wonderful methods.
I want a canoe, but not sure I want one that I need to wear and I don't plan on going out of Algoa Bay in it...
I find the various different stories so interesting and love the way they figure out what probably happened from weird and wonderful methods.
I want a canoe, but not sure I want one that I need to wear and I don't plan on going out of Algoa Bay in it...
My stepbrother has this hilarious story where they took a rubber duck that was supposed to be used on Langebaan lagoon out to sea and landed at some beach for a picnic. Problem was that they could not relaunch the thing into the ocean and the navy eventually had to come and rescue them...
Chapter 10
I remember the Rwanda massacre, but since it coincided with the 1994 elections, I don't think South Africa was that focused on it. I didn't realise the population density is as high as that.
As far as I know, there are many people who ascribe the Somalia/Ethiopia/Eritrea conflicts and situations mainly to environmental factors. There is competition for very scarce water and different agricultural practises (herdsmen who travel with livestock in search of water and food vs pastoralists who grow stuff in fixed locations) and the tensions plays out between the countries.
I remember the Rwanda massacre, but since it coincided with the 1994 elections, I don't think South Africa was that focused on it. I didn't realise the population density is as high as that.
As far as I know, there are many people who ascribe the Somalia/Ethiopia/Eritrea conflicts and situations mainly to environmental factors. There is competition for very scarce water and different agricultural practises (herdsmen who travel with livestock in search of water and food vs pastoralists who grow stuff in fixed locations) and the tensions plays out between the countries.
Chapter 4:
Now this was a great chapter!
- The denchocrhnology (sp) fascinates me! I have always wanted to know more about it. And now I know a bit more about how it works!
- The packrat middens are so fascinating and gross, I would love to study something like that!
@Carolien - none that I am aware off. I wonder if the paleontologists deal with something like this in SA... I'll ask someone :)
- I find the deforestation theory very interesting, and I'll use this as an example if I have to, tomorrow in the exam.
- Cannibalism - I find it intriguing that anthropologists want to ignore the fact, and it makes me think if under extreme condition I would resort to it. I'm not sure tbh. Would you guys?
Now this was a great chapter!
- The denchocrhnology (sp) fascinates me! I have always wanted to know more about it. And now I know a bit more about how it works!
- The packrat middens are so fascinating and gross, I would love to study something like that!
@Carolien - none that I am aware off. I wonder if the paleontologists deal with something like this in SA... I'll ask someone :)
- I find the deforestation theory very interesting, and I'll use this as an example if I have to, tomorrow in the exam.
- Cannibalism - I find it intriguing that anthropologists want to ignore the fact, and it makes me think if under extreme condition I would resort to it. I'm not sure tbh. Would you guys?
I don't know.It is one thing to talk theoretical (if I was in a dire state, there was no other food and the other person was dead but not from an illness, then maybe) but if I was really in that situation I can't say how I would react. It might also play a role in who the dead person was. If I knew them alive, it would be harder I think.
I just don't know how I would, you know eat it. Do you try and cook it a bit? But that is the same with any animal you have to eat in the wild. I think it would freak me out equally.
I have about 80 pages to go which I will read when I get back in two weeks time. Thanks Lu for finally getting me to read this one.
I'm flying to Perth tonight and then onto Darwin. My husband and I are driving from Darwin to Adelaide over the next 8 days! I'll be back on the 6th and let you know how it went. (Fortunately I have just read the chapter on Australia so can have a look at some of the salt lakes on the way!)
I'm flying to Perth tonight and then onto Darwin. My husband and I are driving from Darwin to Adelaide over the next 8 days! I'll be back on the 6th and let you know how it went. (Fortunately I have just read the chapter on Australia so can have a look at some of the salt lakes on the way!)
That sounds fantastic Carolien! Enjoy!
I'm leaving to a workshop/conference tomorrow, so hopefully I get some reading done while there, and you return to some comments about the book :)
I'm leaving to a workshop/conference tomorrow, so hopefully I get some reading done while there, and you return to some comments about the book :)
I read The Singing Line a few years ago and we are following the same route, Darwin to Adelaide. There is also a cyclone due to arrive in Darwin tomorrow!
I saw this article on the NYTimes about the Anasazi sites and how GPS technology is having a negative impact on the preservation of the sites.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/23/opi...
Before I read the book, I probably wouldn't even have looked at the article, now I am quite interested.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/23/opi...
Before I read the book, I probably wouldn't even have looked at the article, now I am quite interested.
In SA we are very careful with GPS coordinates of sites/rock art. It never gets published and only the heritage authority of SA and a few archaeologists know. I'm not talking about the famous sites that everyone knows about, but about the ones that the public doesn't know about. There are 100 of thousands of sites that are documented and then saved in a database that you can only access if you have a permit etc.
GPS has been a marvel in SA! We use it for some much: mapping of large sites, stone walls especially etc.
But yea I can see how GPS'ing can be negative in other countries.
Oh yea we also GPS some distance from the site, in our reports, to also avoid this type of thing.
GPS has been a marvel in SA! We use it for some much: mapping of large sites, stone walls especially etc.
But yea I can see how GPS'ing can be negative in other countries.
Oh yea we also GPS some distance from the site, in our reports, to also avoid this type of thing.
That's so interesting. I'm glad that we are careful to protect our sites.
The impact of technology is amazing. I read an article a while ago on how Prof Lee Burger and his team is using Google Earth to identify potential fossil sites for investigation in the general Sterkfontein area.
The impact of technology is amazing. I read an article a while ago on how Prof Lee Burger and his team is using Google Earth to identify potential fossil sites for investigation in the general Sterkfontein area.
Yea we have one of the best Heritage agencies and legislation! :)
Yea Google Earth is amazing! We all use it now for sooo many things :) Also 3D scanners and 3D printing! It is amazing what archaeologists are doing with technology now :D
Yea Google Earth is amazing! We all use it now for sooo many things :) Also 3D scanners and 3D printing! It is amazing what archaeologists are doing with technology now :D
I just came back from a conference where one guy showed us a stone tool he made with 3D Printing! It was so cool!
Books mentioned in this topic
The Singing Line (other topics)Nation (other topics)
The Seven Daughters of Eve: The Science That Reveals Our Genetic Ancestry (other topics)
The Sculptors of Mapungubwe (other topics)
Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (other topics)
Because this is such a hectic read full of detail it might take some time for us to get through and discuss. I suggest we discuss it by chapter. As you read a chapter and want to comment, please post and say Chapter 1 and start off the discussion :)
I will probably start tomorrow.