Science and Natural History discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archived
>
Group Read Nominations for February 2014
date
newest »


Unless there comes a lot more suggestions I'll carry
Steven’s suggestions for January (which all came too late to be included) and this will be closing tomorrow around noon GMT+1/UTC+1.
Steven’s suggestions for January (which all came too late to be included) and this will be closing tomorrow around noon GMT+1/UTC+1.
Conor wrote: "Isn't it silly to let one person nominate more than one book?"
Everyone can suggest more than one book. More than one book pr. person has been allowed since November because there were four nominations the month before and two were from the same person. Though I'll say there probably should be a limit pr. person. Two or three?
Everyone can suggest more than one book. More than one book pr. person has been allowed since November because there were four nominations the month before and two were from the same person. Though I'll say there probably should be a limit pr. person. Two or three?

Conor wrote: "I understand that has been the case, but what had happened is one person posting ten suggestions which is a bit daft!"
I would prefer if you explained the problems rather than threw words like silly and daft around. In this case as I see it we'd like to avoid one persons suggestions dominating the poll, which has been the case somewhat the last months (while that doesn't mean those books have been chosen). I've carried three of Steven's suggestions, and will from next month only allow three suggestions pr. person.
I would prefer if you explained the problems rather than threw words like silly and daft around. In this case as I see it we'd like to avoid one persons suggestions dominating the poll, which has been the case somewhat the last months (while that doesn't mean those books have been chosen). I've carried three of Steven's suggestions, and will from next month only allow three suggestions pr. person.

Still can't locate the poll using the Goodreads mobile app. Perhaps if you post the link in a comment in this thread...?
Katherine (Kat) wrote: "Still can't locate the poll using the Goodreads mobile app. Perhaps if you post the link in a comment in this thread...?"
It is as a comment Jan 16, 2014 01:33AM. (Not sure if links on words function while mobile, but if not that is a big oversight from Goodreads)
Here it is again: www.goodreads.com/poll/show/96628-whi...
It is as a comment Jan 16, 2014 01:33AM. (Not sure if links on words function while mobile, but if not that is a big oversight from Goodreads)
Here it is again: www.goodreads.com/poll/show/96628-whi...

I hope I will manage to read it in time as this one hasn't been translated to Czech though.
Kristoffer wrote: "And The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene got selected by 9 of 31 votes."
Looking forward to it. -Matt
Looking forward to it. -Matt
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (other topics)The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (other topics)
Dinosaur in a Haystack (other topics)
The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (other topics)
It Ain't Necessarily So: The Dream of the Human Genome and Other Illusions (other topics)
- Books must be nonfiction, within our general theme.
- Nominations are open until 15th of January.
- Please add suggestions using add book/author.
- All recommendations will be featured in a subsequent poll. Should have results for 22th or so.
- Feel free to pitch, especially in the comments at the poll.