Beyond Reality discussion

This topic is about
The Summer Tree
SERIES—List & Discussions
>
Fionavar Tapestry--The Summer Tree: Roll call and first impressions (NO SPOILERS!)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Shel, Moderator
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jan 15, 2014 12:10PM

reply
|
flag
Read this many years ago and will be rereading for the group discussion... but I'm going to be late as I have another book to finish first.









It feels like a mashup of Silmarillion, Zelazny's Amber series and Wheel of Time (I know, the last one was written later).
Silmarillion: mythopoeic style with all the short introductions of names, hints and titbits of ancient history and landscape descriptions. Kay helped Christopher Tolkien with editing the Silmarillion before, and this influence certainly shines through. There is the one antagonist coming up.
Amber series: contemporary characters brought to a mediaeval world, a world which is at the center of things.
Wheel of Time: weaving a destiny pattern.
I love all three themes and series, especially the mythopoeic aspect. I can see where others would have problems with that one, though. Probably it is a matter of taste and background.
It is a strong contrast to Kay's newer work - Kay's style in Tigana is better developed. Lions was a step backward (not every development is a good one).
I love to see the connection with Ysabel, (view spoiler) .

Similar for me with some of Kay's books. Fionavar worked for me from the first line, probably because of the mythopoeic style.

I'm also struggling with some of the terminology. Once the characters get into Fionavar, Kay just buries you in names, history, and geography. Maybe it wouldn't be so bad if I was taking notes, but trying to keep track of all that while driving isn't working so well for me. Hopefully, it won't matter too much.

I read this book in the early 1990s. I can barely recall what happened. But I never went on to read the other books in the series - I think I was too busy doing other things to pay attention to when the next book was to be published. Is there any reason that I should go back and re-read the first book and finish the series? Thanks!
Boradicus wrote: " Is there any reason that I should go back and re-read the first book and finish the series? Thanks!”
I would say yes. I read the trilogy back in the late 80s when it first was published and love it. It was my introduction to Guy Gavriel Kay, who remains one of my favorite authors. I reread it with the group for this discussion and loved it all over again.
I would say yes. I read the trilogy back in the late 80s when it first was published and love it. It was my introduction to Guy Gavriel Kay, who remains one of my favorite authors. I reread it with the group for this discussion and loved it all over again.
Thanks! Were there any specific reasons why you liked it?
Boradicus wrote: "Thanks! Were there any specific reasons why you liked it?"
I found it to be very emotional, very bittersweet. The first time I read it, I wascloser in age to the characters, so maybe I could identify a bit more with them. There is a connection to the Arthurian legends, which I have always loved. The second time I read the trilogy, I had read several of Kay’s other books and one can tell he has grown and matured as a writer since he wrote these, and yet, I think they hold up quite well.
I found it to be very emotional, very bittersweet. The first time I read it, I wascloser in age to the characters, so maybe I could identify a bit more with them. There is a connection to the Arthurian legends, which I have always loved. The second time I read the trilogy, I had read several of Kay’s other books and one can tell he has grown and matured as a writer since he wrote these, and yet, I think they hold up quite well.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Summer Tree (other topics)One Hundred Years of Solitude (other topics)