Devon Book Club discussion
Bits and Bobs
>
Updates to children's classics
date
newest »


However, I tend to think this (ie: 'appalling arrogance') about 'biofiction' and I think I'm pretty much alone on that one. I don't mind good, well-written, honest biography (ie: the biographers actually say when they 'don't know' something, and admit when they may just be 'surmising', as Claire Tomalin does). However, I have a lot of trouble with realistic 'biofiction' novels that have people who actually once existed doing things that there is no record for, and which often seem utterly out of character. A few are wonderful, use the facts and seem to absorb the 'known' of the individual: such as Colm Toibin's 'The Master'; but others are awful.
Meanwhile, I'm trying to remember other examples of such fiction rewrites. There must be some, but my mind is blank at the moment.
Oh ... there are the 'recent' Bond books, but I have not read any, and know little of their reception.

I think there are actually many more modern books which are a simple reworking of a classic tale than we might realise - just that in this case Jacqueline Wilson has told us all from where she draws her influence.
Personally I am appalled at such arrogance. What does anyone else think?