♥ Nothing Better Than Reading!! ♥ discussion
Debates - Share your opinion!
>
Zombies vs Vampires
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Erin *Proud Book Hoarder*
(new)
Sep 23, 2015 06:39PM

reply
|
flag



For instance: Zombies, there's currently popular zombies which are the rotting, flesh hungry, mindless walkers (i.e. The Walking Dead). But back before "Night of the Living Dead" popularized this type, there were zombies, which were simply dead people resurrected by magic. Some were mindless automatons, which simply did menial tasks for the person who raised them. Others were brought back with full cognition, aware of who they were before they died.
As for vampires, if we went with Twilight vampires (shudder), they'd be mostly immune to anything the walker zombies could do to them. As for traditional vampires, I'd think they'd have the advantage over walkers. Faster and stronger, but they can't feed on zombies (vamps can't drink blood from the dead). So this means they would have to compete for a food source. Or this would mean that in a vamps vs zombies fight, it would actually be over who gets control over the remaining humans, once a human is turned, they can no longer be food for vampires. In this respect, I think the vampires would lose. Once a human is turned (to vampire or zombie) they can no longer be fed on.
Fun fact about vampires, there's a few legends about vampires are actually people who hibernate in coffins, and project a corporeal form which goes around and feeds on humans.

Therefore vampires would starve to death. :)
I would go with the zombies because they'd eat the vampires' brains. And if the vampires tried to suck ther blood it would probably taste pretty nasty so they'd starve. Also zombies could drag them into the light and have roasted vamp brain for lunch :)

