Reading List Completists discussion

This topic is about
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell
Jonathan S. & Mr N.-Oct-Dec 2015
>
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell by Susanna Clark - General Discussion
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Matthew, Assistant List Master
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Sep 28, 2015 10:45AM

reply
|
flag



The beginning is reminding me of The Amazing Adventures of Kavelier and Clay.
Definitely picked up with the second chapter.
I read Cavalier and Clay - trying to remember - nothing clicking at the moment with similarities . . . but it is first thing in the morning here!
I read Cavalier and Clay - trying to remember - nothing clicking at the moment with similarities . . . but it is first thing in the morning here!


I think that is my goal, too. One chapter a day - 69 chapters - should finish in early December. Perfect!

Are the footnotes important? I'm reading the book on Overdrive and read them for the first chapter, but they didn't really add to the story. Am I OK to skip them?
Justin - so far the footnotes haven't added much, but I peeked ahead at chapter 5 and it seems to be mostly footnote.
(Infinite Jest, anyone?)
(Infinite Jest, anyone?)
One day I will write a book that is only 10 real pages long, but 500 pages of footnotes. I will call it "The Infinite Jest of Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell"

I am enjoying - but the writing style is definitely a little drier than I am used to. Perhaps I should not be reading this late at night when I am tired!

Yup, sounds like a "you" issue. LOL
Justin wrote: "Just started this, and I was thinking the same thing. A chapter a day, maybe two.
Are the footnotes important? I'm reading the book on Overdrive and read them for the first chapter, but they didn..."
I previously read quite a bit of the book before being waylaid onto other things. I don't remember any of the footnotes being essential to the plot. Although, they can be interesting and quite funny. I've read a few comments where people said they read the story and then went back and read the footnotes and their enjoyment of the book didn't suffer for it.
Are the footnotes important? I'm reading the book on Overdrive and read them for the first chapter, but they didn..."
I previously read quite a bit of the book before being waylaid onto other things. I don't remember any of the footnotes being essential to the plot. Although, they can be interesting and quite funny. I've read a few comments where people said they read the story and then went back and read the footnotes and their enjoyment of the book didn't suffer for it.


Just curious, is there going to be a discussion thread breaking down the book into parts to discuss (like with Infinite Jest, which I'm still mad I ended up not being able to join you all on, it's still sitting on my shelf waiting to be read and I swear it's going to be one of the next few books I read, I'm going to make sure of it lol), or are we just going to leave it at general chat here?
Brittney - good question - I hadn't really thought about it. I can go either way . . . what do others think/prefer?


Sounds good - I am having some thoughts on this - when I am at a computer I will see what I can set up

I have started creating some additional discussion threads - starting with part 1. This will remain open for general discussion.

Well, this book didn't go quite as well for me as it did for others:
Matthew's Review of Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell
Matthew's Review of Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell
Books mentioned in this topic
The Golem and the Jinni (other topics)The Night Circus (other topics)