Underground Knowledge — A discussion group discussion
MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
>
Fluoride - is it safe for consumption?


After the plant has raised the crude inorganic matter of the soil into plant protoplasm, the animal may take these and raise them to a still higher plane—that of animal protoplasm. But the animal cannot do the work of the plant. He must get his food either directly or indirectly from the plant kingdom. That is, the animal must either eat the plant or its fruits, or he must eat the animal that has eaten the plant. Food must be in the organic form. Air and water form the only exceptions to this rule. ”
--HERBERT M. SHELTON


Right. Only plants can convert inorganic matter into organic matter.


Respect.
I don't know much about it, but it seems a lot of people seem to lose weight successfully and keep it off by turning vegan.

This is not a natural compound; it is the byproduct of the production of Superphosphate fertilizer (according to Wikipedia, among other sites). It is "rapidly and quite extensively absorbed" by the body.
To answer the initial question, one must research the subject to gain an accurate answer. Trusting others to give us answers often leads us down roads we never intended to travel.


If fluoride is "useful" for oral health, how does it work?



So surely there has to be an alternative to fluoride for the teeth? Like something that doesn't harm the entire body.


So the fluoride used in toothpaste is also toxic and carcinogenic?


p.s. The above video mentions that the Japan and most of Europe have banned fluoridation of public water supplies...

You know the saying, "you are what you eat." That goes for the animals you eat as well. Think about the slop pigs are fed. Think about the garbage and waste food products they eat and now think about how that goes into your body when you eat pork.

Should not the resident have the right to choose whether they want fluoride treatment? it's not like the fluoride is preventing a communicable disease..... sounds like a distorted understanding of Freedom of Choice

Some key excerpts:
"The world’s oldest and most prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, has officially classified fluoride as a neurotoxin — in the same category as arsenic, lead and mercury."
"The report coincides with 2013 findings by a Harvard University meta-analysis funded by the National Institutes of Health that concluded that children in areas with highly fluoridated water have “significantly lower” IQ scores that those who live in areas with low amounts of fluoride in their water supplies."
"Sodium fluoride in drinking water has also been linked to various cancers. It is functionally different than the naturally-occurring calcium fluoride, and commonly added to drinking water supplies and used by dentists who posit that it is useful for dental health."
Read full article here: http://wakingscience.com/2016/02/fluo...

Vote and have your say here: https://www.goodreads.com/poll/show/1...


I came to the conclusion that it was triggered by the city water because I went back to visit my mother and the water smelled like chemicals to me. . . I got a bath and the eczema returned that night.
I told my doctor I have well water now and he prescribes me fluoride pills :D

I will never take fluoride pills. It just doesn't really sit well with me.

Ditto


Fluoride: Drinking Ourselves To Death?

Fluoride The Aging Factor: How To Recognize And Avoid The Devastating Effects Of Fluoride

The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There


I just wanted to point out that a mineral is a mineral is a mineral. Each mineral has a specific structure and it's the same regardless of how you make it.
And in chemistry, an inorganic compound generally just means one without carbon. You know, like oxigen doesn't.

I came to the conclusion that it was triggered by the city water because I went back to visit my mother and the water smelled like chemicals to me. . . I got a bath and the eczema returned that night."
But you can't say it was the water, though. When you went back you were also exposed to all kinds of things that are different in the country. How do you know which one it is?



I just wanted to point out that a mineral is a mineral is a mine..."
If what you say were true, you could treat a calcium deficiency by eating sand. There is calcium in sand.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/20...
We are poisoning our waters with fluoride http://www.aspentimes.com/opinion/let...

For 10 years, a chemical not EPA approved was in their drinking water https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/11/he...
"(CNN)For 10 years, some residents in Denmark, South Carolina, have been suspicious of the rust-colored water coming from their taps. They've been collecting samples in jars and using bottled or spring water, even though the local and state government assured them it was safe."

Salt is not necessary for survival. In fact, it is harmful. Organic sodium and organic chloride are necessary, but neither is available in salt, which is inorganic. Millions of people have lived for many generations without any knowledge of salt. Salt is indigestible and therefore is toxic in any dosage.


What kind of "behaviour"? Active or passive behavior? Salt is not necessary to balance electrolytes. Dr. Max Gerson put all his patients on strict salt-free diets and gave them potassium supplements. And his patients did very well.

"Behaviour" was used to mean "doing whatever…"
Books mentioned in this topic
The Fluoride Deception (other topics)Fluoride: Drinking Ourselves to Death (other topics)
Fluoride the Aging Factor: How to Recognize and Avoid the Devastating Effects of Fluoride (other topics)
The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There (other topics)
Tap water usually contains high levels of fluoride. Numerous studies have shown fluoride reduces IQ levels and in some cases even causes brain damage (never a good thing for those wanting to become geniuses!).
In January 2013, physician and author Dr. Joseph Mercola wrote an article for the Huffington Post titled 'Harvard Study Confirms Fluoride Reduces Children's IQ'.
“A recently-published Harvard University meta-analysis funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH),” the article states, “has concluded that children who live in areas with highly fluoridated water have "significantly lower" IQ scores than those who live in low fluoride areas.”
The Harvard study showed that Flouride causes neurotoxicity which negatively impacts learning and memory.
“There are so many scientific studies showing the direct, toxic effects of flouride on your body,” Dr. Mercola continues in the Huffington Post article, “it’s truly remarkable that it’s NOT considered a scientific consensus by now. Despite the evidence against it, fluoride is still added to 70 percent of U.S. public drinking water supplies.”
Besides fluoride there are a whole host of other contaminants usually found in tap water – such as Chlorine and lead – and none of these will do a human brain any favors.
Be interested to hear what others think about fluoride being in our water supply.