Mock Newbery 2026 discussion

This topic is about
Goodbye Stranger
Book of the Month - 2016
>
October Read - Goodbye Stranger
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kristen
(last edited Oct 01, 2015 05:23AM)
(new)
Oct 01, 2015 05:20AM

reply
|
flag

You got a brand-new key.
I think that we should get together
And try them out, you see.”
-- Melanie Safka (1972)
“What Emily had decided to do was take a picture of herself in her new jeans, with no shirt on.
‘But wearing a bra, which is basically the same as a bathing suit,’ she told Bridge. ‘And I’ll do one of those photo filters, so it’s kind of fuzzy? You know, artsy.’
‘Tell me again why you’re doing this?’ Bridge said. ‘One more time.’
‘What if my boyfriend asked for a picture of me in my bathing suit?’
‘I’d say he was creepy. Is Patrick even your boyfriend?’
‘You promised not to be judgy. People walk around the city in less than a bathing suit!’
‘I’m not being judgy,’ Bridge said. I’m being--asky.’
Em started brushing her hair out in front of the mirror.
‘We want to, like--show ourselves. Be real. Do things for each other we wouldn’t do for anyone else.’
‘Why don’t you just talk to each other? Isn’t that more real, more you, than a fuzzy picture of your bra?’”
Emily, Bridget, and Tabitha have been inseparable since they were little kids. They maintain their friendship through a promise of No Fighting. But in seventh grade, little cracks are appearing in their friendship. Em has matured physically and she’s attracting attention from older boys. Bridge is becoming friends with a boy, too, though she’s not clear what her new friendship with Sherm Russo means. Tab is a budding feminist who is, otherwise, not yet thinking about boys.
Do you remember playing Punch buggy; Rock-Paper-Scissors; Telephone; and Duck, Duck, Goose?
GOODBYE STRANGER is a coming-of-age tale set in New York City. It is framed in terms of the many games children play, the little dares and bets with which they challenge one another, and the groups they form. It’s about how these innocent games, dares, bets, and groupings evolve into far more mature diversions as kids grow up.
GOODBYE STRANGER is told in alternating chapters from three different points of view.
The primary story follows Bridget Barsamian, who’s an accident survivor. When Bridge was eight, on roller skates, she turned to call back to Tab and accidentally skated into traffic. She underwent multiple operations and rehab.
A second narrative is told through Sherm’s letters, written to his absent grandfather but never sent.
The holder of the third perspective is mysterious: a slightly older, unnamed character who is only one or two degrees of separation from Bridge, her family, and her friends.
The character development of the five primary characters--the three girlfriends, Sherm, and Bridge’s big brother Jamie--is superb. We can feel the discomfort resulting from the changes each of the three girls is undergoing. I love the growing relationship between Bridge and Sherm, two relatively innocent kids who just know how much they look forward to seeing one another.
Holding hands and first kisses have been around for a long time. But plenty has changed in recent years. As today’s young people enter the grown-up world of texting, Facebook, and smart phones, it’s essential that kids watch out for one another because the games young people play can have irreversible consequences.
Filled with twists, surprises, and game-playing, GOODBYE STRANGER will be both captivating and instructive for tweens entering adolescence.
Richie Partington, MLIS
Richie's Pickshttp://richiespicks.pbworks.com
BudNotBuddy@aol.com
https://www.facebook.com/richie.parti...
Moderatorhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/middle_...




I do realize Stead attacks a very important subject that need to be addressed to today's tweens. I rated the book 5 stars because it deserves it. But to be honest, I hope it doesn't win the Newbery. I know the Newbery Award winning books span from ages 4th/5th grade all the way to 8th grade; however, I really don't want my fifth graders reading this book. I promote the Newbery a lot in my reading classes and wouldn't want the 4th and 5th graders to be exposed to this book. Does that sound weird?


I am in the same boat you are. I love Stead and adored When You Reach Me. Goodbye Stranger isn't holding my attention. Maybe there are just too many great middle reader books this year. Sure not a terrible thing.

It's not just you. I had to force myself to finish it. I was unimpressed.

Here's my personal review. (I have no idea what the Newbery committee will think):
I gave it 3 stars. The best aspect was how likable the main characters were. The three female best friends and two boys were sweet and I enjoyed reading about their growth. However, I found the "mystery" high school student element to be distracting. After realizing who she was, I didn't understand why this had to be a secret. I didn't see why the author didn't just name her from the start, really. Also, her infraction while serious wasn't really as awful as the whole let's-keep-her-identity-a-secret ploy led me to suspect. Further, I was disappointed in the ending. Too saccharine. I definitely could have done without the epilogue. Bleck! And finally - and this criticism may only be because I'm an adult and an educator - the photos were just too easily dismissed. I'm fine with Emily still liking herself, but let's think about this - a seventh grader in a lacy bra - that's a twelve or thirteen-year-old! I wish the author would have shown something of how she actually does regret this decision and that those photos will always exist!

The Newbery criteria states "Children are defined as persons of ages up to and including fourteen, and books for this entire age range are to be considered." I personally love seeing books that reach those boundaries - it's rare but amazing to see a picture book or shorter work honored, and while I can understand that it's easier for people who work with 3-6th graders to share books appropriate for that age range, I don't think this pushes the upper boundary at all.
I love that the characters represent a variety of middle-school types - some that are ready to think about romance and are dealing with issues of sexuality, and others that aren't. I think this book would appeal to either kind of middle-schooler - the ones that are there, and the ones who are mystified by their peers that are trying out those things.
This is my top choice for Newbery so far - I haven't read very widely yet, but I think this would stand out no matter what else I read.


I'm with you. I hope it wins a Printz, but not a Newbery.
In fact, I am using it as an 8th grade read-aloud. Some students are really into it, but I have a couple of immature students who can't handle it.

I agree with you, Hillery, that Stead does a great job handling cyber-citizenship issues very well.

I think the author was trying to demonstrate with the anonymous character what it is like to be disconnected, since she did not have her cell phone with her all day.
The author showed another way of remaining unattached when Sherm refused to open voice mails or texts from his grandfather.
I did not interpret these episodes as preachy statements about the value of disengaging, but as counter-points to those characters who were so heavily reliant of their phones.

I think the author was trying to de..."
It's Rebecca Stead- she does quirky things for smart reasons. In this case, though, I thought the gimmick overshadowed the storytelling.

It's funny, for me when you reach me was meh; but I couldn't put this one down. Different strokes.

I loved When You Reach Me and so did two adult and kid book clubs that I ran
This just didn't grab me and I did not care for the female characters...I was sorry not to love it

Not a strong Newbery contender in my opinion: one, this is a YA novel (I know it's set in sophisticated NYC, but these seventh graders act like ninth graders - or older), and two, the book kind of loses its way - due to an overabundance of characters and an unfairly tricky plot leading to a bit of unearned melodrama.
On the positive side, I loved reading about Bridge and Sherm - but they seemed to be in a different book than the rest of the characters.




As others have pointed out, some of the issues that this book deals with seem to be too mature for a Newbery and make this a YA book. Unfortunately, I think that's just wishful thinking on the part of adults. Issues of sexting, cyberbullying, new relationships, etc. are definitely not confined to high school students. We have had to deal with these issues in the middle school that I work in, and unfortunately it seems to be trickling down to elementary schools as well. I think that Rebecca Stead deals with those issues in a way that middle schoolers can relate to without coming across as a preachy adult telling kids not to sext or cyberbully. Newflash: Kids know not to do it. They go to these seminars in the first week of school. And yet, kids still do it. Clearly that method isn't working, so I wouldn't want this book to have taken the same approach (by having Em show remorse, for example) but disguise it in a novel. I think Stead's approach of showing children's understanding of these issues makes for not only a more realistic story, but one that is much better written. For me, I would rather read this book with my middle schoolers and use it as a conversation starter about these issues--Why doesn't Em feel remorse? Is her reason perhaps legitimate in a world that has a bit more complexity and gray area than simply right and wrong? What about the reaction of the other kids, and Tab's misapplication of the Berperson's feminisim? If we shelve this book as YA out of fear that its too-mature-for-children themes (according to adults) would somehow corrupt younger students, I think we miss a valuable chance to discuss these issues before the ubiquitous corruption takes root from other, less gentle sources.
All that being said, is this worthy of a Newbery? To me, this book fits two important Newbery criteria: 1) The book displays respect for children’s understandings, abilities, and appreciations; and 2) The award is for literary quality and quality presentation for children. The award is not for didactic content.
It may not be my first choice for the Newbery, but I certainly don't think its supposedly mature themes eliminate it from contention.

However, I read the book through again recently and did not feel like it held up as much. The characters felt a little too much like caricatures of middle school students and the mystery narrator device felt a little too gimmicky.
That being said, it feels like a weak year to me, so I wouldn't be surprised to see it sneak in with an honor. I'd like to read it once more after the rest of this year's releases come out and see if it feels stronger again.

I agree with many of the things previously said, but my biggest concern with this book is truly the lack of remorse for sending the picture and the fact that she STAYED in a relationship where she was pressured into doing something she didn't really want to do at first. What WAS Rebecca Stead thinking?!? That was my deciding factor for not adding it to our school library. I know of a similar incident that happened in a school, and students, middle school students (!) were going to be prosecuted because of it...it's not a joke...it's very serious and I think she took it too lightly. Kids love her books...she could've made a difference with this one.



I am struggling with the whole "showing what not to do" aspect of the book. I recently pulled Heaven from my class library because I thought it might accidentally encourage cutting.
There was a study done once in which group A of children were read the George Washington and the Cherry Tree fable and group B were read The Boy Who Cried Wolf. Group A became less likely to lie than a control group, and Group B became more likely to lie than the control group, even though the fable is supposed to discourage lying.
I think about that a lot and what it says about the way the human mind handles contradicting images and messages.

Here is a similar story from the news this week:
http://www.people.com/article/twenty-...
The 14 year old boy who participated in the sex act and the boy who shot the 10 second video were arrested for child pornography. There is no indication that the girl who participated in the sex act was arrested or disciplined.
Anyone who received the video on their phone was suspended from school. Those who forwarded the video to others received longer suspensions. Those who received the video and deleted it were suspended because they did not tell a school official. One boy who felt the suspension was unwarranted tried to attend school. He was arrested.
How do these actions differ from those in Goodbye Stranger? Are they more or less appropriate responses by school administration and local police?


I don't think this one is a Newbery contender, although I generally love Stead's writing.

And yet, there is some truth in a girl feeling the power of her own beauty & attractiveness, and refusing to be shamed by it, that self-aware, thoughtful, stable girls would realistically feel.
The way Sherm

Agree!

The way Sherm what? Don't leave us hanging!

Books mentioned in this topic
Heaven (other topics)Goodbye Stranger (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Mike Lupica (other topics)Rebecca Stead (other topics)