Cozy Mysteries discussion
What do you think?
>
Kindle Or Printed Form-Which Do You Like Best?
message 1:
by
Elizabeth
(new)
Nov 08, 2015 07:39PM

reply
|
flag


I still load up my iPad when I travel though - just in case I run out of printed books. :)


I read predominantly more print books, but I do find my Nook convenient at times as well -- particularly for reading the classics. I have several "classic" anthologies each purchased for only $3 and containing 25-50 books each, which make them more economical than buying individual books. It's also lighter and easier to hold than a 500-1000 page tome. I also have a variety of free books on it across different genres.



I have an embarrassing number of Pride and Prejudice and Sherlock Holmes editions! :)



Today my main reason is because it so easy to hold. I have carpal tunnel syndrome and holding a paperback or hardback caused pain in my hands. I can prop my ereader on my lap or pillow and be hands-free holding! The secondary reason for my love of ereaders is the ability to adjust font size plus sharpness, line spacing, margins, font type, etc. As I get older, the font sizes in paper books seem to shrink. My Kobo has 24 font sizes! It also is lighted (not front lit like tablets and smartphones which cause eye strain) so I can read in bed late at night.
The benefits of ereading far outweigh any justification for me to read on paper anymore so there is no turning back for me. I definitely am clearing out my bookshelves of paper books and donating them.

These statements make me think that both of your Kindles are tablets. However, Amazon makes Kindle ereaders with e-ink that are very different from their Fire tablets. Don't write e-ink ereaders off if you haven't tried one.
❂ Jennifer (reviews on BookLikes) wrote: "...But I also cannot use any digital devices for several hours before bed for medical reasons..."
Have you ever tried an ereader with e-ink? That's very different from reading on a tablet. It's like reading from paper.
I don't like reading books on tablets. I enjoy reading from both paper and ereaders, but I prefer reading on my Kindles. When I don't need an added light source, I usually use my regular Kindle, but I use my Paperwhite when it's too dark to read without a light. I like my Kindle for reasons already stated by other people. I like being able to adjust the fonts to a comfortable size and style for my old eyes, plus adjust the line spacing. I like being able to stick a Kindle in my purse whenever I leave home and always having a book with me in case I have to wait somewhere. I can read my Paperwhite in bed when I can't sleep during the night, and there's not a bright light to bother my husband; my iPad's light is far too bright even at the lowest setting.
I also love audiobooks, because I can listen to them while I'm doing cooking, cleaning, and laundry.
However, I'll always still read paper books. My family owns more than 2500, and I'd like to read at least 650 of those. I still get paper books from the library. Usually it's because a book isn't available in ebook or eaudio, but sometimes it's because it's a long book that I don't think I would finish before the ebook's due date. I also only buy Kindle books if they're very cheap. If I want to own a book (that's only if I want to read it repeatedly or if I'll need to use it over a long period of time), I buy a paper edition.

These statements make me think that both of your Kindles are tablets. However, Amazon makes Kindle..."
Yes, both my Kindles are Fires, but I've looked at the Paperwhites and just don't like them. There's something totally missing for me when I read an e-book. They hold my attention for no more than a half hour or so at a time. With a "real" book, I can sit down with it and never stop until I'm all the way through. Even the books I've read electronically that I really, really liked took me forever to read. Something about the experience is missing for me.

Have you ever tried an ereader with e-ink? That's very different from reading on a tablet. It's like reading from paper..."
I know about and have used the e-inks, but they too are digital devices; they might feel like reading from paper, but your brain knows it isn't, and at any rate, readability isn't the issue for me, it's the electronics/digital displays.
Even without the medical restrictions though, I'd prefer printed books. I find the same thing Melodie does - even books I love don't hold my attention when I read them electronically, but in print, the world could end and I'd be the last to know. Which works out perfectly given my medical restrictions.
I prefer ereader now and I hardly read paper books. It's more practical for me and my back, as I always carry the ereader with me (unless the bag is too small -night bag mainly-, and then I use the phone). Furthermore, I live in Spain and shiping costs are high. And my flat is not so big, so space is a problem.
I have no problem with digital devices, I don't miss at all the paper, and I can read for the same long time at any book/device. For me, reading is my thing, not physical sensations related to paper.
I have no problem with digital devices, I don't miss at all the paper, and I can read for the same long time at any book/device. For me, reading is my thing, not physical sensations related to paper.




Same here. As long as I get to enjoy a story or learn some interesting information, it doesn't much matter which format I get it from. Different formats are good for various situations. And the more formats that I enjoy using, the more library books I can find to read/listen to.
Both, actually. But with a house overflowing with books, Kindle does have it's advantages.

Ain't that the truth! Sometimes I worry about the load-bearding ability of the house when I look at the bookshelves.



I have kept a lot of my old print books that I cannot get for free in ebook format. Those are good for bathtub reading.


Very true. It takes forever getting through a chapter on my device.

To me the point would be that eInk is far more readable than tablets are. More like reading a real book, and far less eye strain.

I prefer reading on a Kindle. I like being able to set the font to a size and type that's comfortable for me to read. I only need one hand to use it, since I can just slip my thumb over to change the page. If I don't know the definition of a word, I can place my finger on the word, and the definition will come up (usually).
I get a lot of free Kindle books, and I often find books that interest me priced at 99 cents. My local public library has a lot of Kindle books (currently 9043), and I don't even have to leave home to get a book from it anytime I want. I also don't have to take it back to the library or be concerned about paying late fines.
However, I still like paper books and occasionally buy one, if it's one I know I'll want to reread. My family owns about 2500.




Good reason to use your kindle! Better the bedbugs stay at the library than hitch a ride to your house.


I dont enjoy the kindle so much. I am sick of computers. Maybe because I have to work with one for 10hours at work each day I work.
I am not addicted to technology at all. Give me a paperback that I can "high five" as I walk by touching each novel to decide what to read. That is lovely to me.








At least all my E-books were able to be recovered.

That is so awful! But at least you got the books! That is not a good feeling.
I dropped my brand new copy of Lord of the Rings in a puddle of water. It slipped out of my bag. I about fainted! I bought this edition with all 3 books in it after searching forever for it. It was a felt cover with the gold embossed ring on it. I was crushed.
