Sci-Fi, fantasy and speculative Indie Authors Review discussion
Writing Technique
>
To skim or not to skim?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Owen
(new)
Dec 27, 2015 01:01PM

reply
|
flag

Skim a bit: fine but skimming too much means it's not interesting and I either want to know what happens next or I need to finish the book while I don't feel like reading it. Either way, that's a no-no for me. It'll lose a star or two, and probably three or four if it's that bad.

Life is too short for bad books.


Unfortunately I don't have a good sense of grammar, so mps, rogue point of views, unfounded punctuation don't faze me, so I don't find that a reason to put down a book unless it's really noticeable.
I think with ebooks, readers will soon be able to choose how descriptive passages will be by selecting which version of the story they want to read. I see in some reviews that people skip over sex and violence because it is too descriptive, not realistic, or just not interested, but continue to read the book. This could mean the days of reading every word becomes optional. The simplest choices would be full blown or abridged.
I have albums where I don't like every song but I still like the album. It's hard to skip a song on vinyl, but a snap with the skip button on a cd player. I have no idea if one can skip to the next streaming tune.

I'll skim for two reasons. First, the story just loses my interest at some point, I'll skim ahead to see if it grabs me again. If so, I might go back and read the parts I skimmed to see if I missed anything. Otherwise, I won't finish.
The second reason is that the plot splits into multiple threads. I'm not always that interested in each thread, so I'll follow the ones a prefer. I don't mind when authors do this, and won't downgrade a book for it, since I'm still getting what I want out of the book anyway.