12 Books - Author Led Business Book Group discussion
Book Discussions
>
It's Not Just Who You Know - May 2014
date
newest »


Here is a link to the blog post: http://www.jacobspaulsen.com/personal...

If one is running their business strategically, it makes perfect sense that cultivating strategic relationships would be part the overall approach.
This is a good guide to finding and nurturing strategic relationships in a mutually beneficial and ethical way.
Favourite quote from the book: 'Focusing on the relationship first means taking the risk that you might never get some of the things you want.'
Side note: This book must have been written outside of the context of the Internet.
Within this context, this suggestion made me laugh: “Don’t ask for autographs and don’t ask to have your picture taken with them. They’ll look at you differently. You want them to look at you as a professional, not as a tourist.”

To me, that's what this book is really about. Spaulding is clearly a big, I mean huge, extravert; he is naturally great at connecting with people. He describes (very engagingly) how he used these talents to overcome his dyslexia and poor academic performance as a child and young man.
That's a good thing, and he is to be admired. But my strengths and weaknesses are the exact opposite, so I couldn't really relate to his approaches. They clearly come naturally to him, but they certainly wouldn't to me, so I was left wanting much more specific advice on how to put the tactics into practice and how to overcome my aversion to all of it (which I kind of would like to overcome, but I'd need a lot more direction than he provides).
What I could relate to is his perseverance and creativity in, as I said, using his natural strengths to overcome adversities. That aspect of the book is uplifting.
In the end, though, I was left wondering how "Miss Harvard University" would have written the story of how Spaulding won the Rotary Club scholarship based on the bartender's recommendation. It's a great story, but what was Miss Harvard's perspective? I'm guessing something like this:
"Great. I work my butt off for 4 years, and once again I lose out to Mr. Social. Story of my life."
I know Spaulding would say that's exactly the point: social smarts trump academic smarts. And please note, I'm not saying either style is wrong. I'm saying that there are folks who prefer to get by with the help of just a few good friends and certain other kinds of competence. I wish Spaulding had gone a bit further to acknowledge those folks and help them out.

To me, that's what this book is re..."
Jocelyn, Your response is really awesome because it is so sincere. I think your are dead on about your summary. I am very social and so I do identify with Spaulding in this case. Your perspective hadn't occurred to me until I read your thoughts here. (That is why I love this book group).
You might consider a book we read in our group a few years ago called "Getting Ahead" which I think would contain more of that tactical direction you may be looking for.

Because in this blended memoir and business book is a great lesson, and a shining ray of hope for anyone who has ever despaired at networking.
You know the scene. You arrive at a networking event and must wade through real estate agents, financial planners, insurance salespeople, multi-level marketing types, etc. during the event. These are examples, and yes I am generalizing, of those who see networking as being about themselves and what they want.
Tommy offers a brilliant gem of wisdom to counter that attitude. “Netgiving,” his newly coined word, describes how we build relationships. Through netgiving we build relationships to help others succeed. He asks us to examine ourselves to determine if we are a giver or a taker.
Why is this important? Because, as he points out, you can’t be a great leader unless you genuinely care about people. When you care about other people, you want to help lift them up, to elevate them. Building such a relationship with people is hard work, just like any relationship. But, as the author points out, a relationship reaches its highest and best potential when you elevate another without regard for personal gain.
This book builds on ageless concepts found in Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People, a book Tommy has devoured and loves. He offers an improvement on Carnegie’s approach. So if you can only read one portion of this book, make it Section Three. On page 151 Tommy offers his nine keys for building what he calls “genuine relationships.” He then follows up with further explanation and examples (yes, including names) in chapters 20 through 28.
Those chapters are the key! What Tommy Spaulding offers is not a program to follow, but a mindset to adopt. Become a net-giver and you will find your way to relationships that build value into themselves, collecting a number of what Tommy Spaulding calls, “fifth floor relationships.” Read the book to learn more about those. It’s worth your while.

Thanks Randy. Your thoughts are dead on with mine. Great principles at play in this book.


I especially liked the author’s model of understanding relationships based on the five levels of communication from communication theory. Relationships range from the basic transactions of the First Floor to the high level of Fifth Floor relationships.
The book shows how to build relationships beyond the basic information that is on the front of a business card. He encourages thinking of turning the business card over to the back and filling in the blanks by discovering more about a person’s interests with observation, questions, and listening. He coins the term netgiving rather than networking for a focus on what we can give rather than what we can get in our interactions with others. Many of the articles I’ve read about networking also recommend this approach.
Nine Key Traits are helpful in achieving real relationships: authenticity, humility, empathy, confidentiality, vulnerability, curiosity, generosity, humor, and gratitude. With short chapters on each of these traits, the author shows how many of the traits can be developed.

While I have read abridgments of Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People, I have not read the book itself. What I have read leads me to feel that that book forges a form of manipulation that I do not feel comfortable with. Mr. Spaulding says he took the book as a starting point and expanded it, adding a "win/win/win" component to the basic principles, and that I really approved of. It's been a long time since I studied business in school, but this work could fit in the lesson plan successfully.

I have not read Carnegie's book, and the multiple references in this book makes me wonder how I would react to this book if I had read it. Can anyone who's read both books share their thoughts on how it might've affected your perspective on Spaulding's book?

I have read both now. I always admired Carnegie's book and believed in the principles. Only upon reading Spaulding's book did I start to reflect on how manipulation based Carnegie's book is. I don't think Carnegie meant or intended to teach people to manipulate others... he just never addressed the topic of intentions at all.
I would recommend both books.
http://www.12booksgroup.com/the-books...