Dangerous Hero Addict Support Group discussion
Food for Thought
>
Prologues and epilogues
date
newest »


Though I did read one in a High Fantasy that was half the book. And it read like a dry history text, I almost DNF it.
Most of the time I enjoy them. Sometimes they give an insight to a character that the story won't be sharing a POV of because it's first person with one lead and such.
I do prefer the prologue to be short if it's a history or back information. Or a recap.
And the prologue has to be a key, or tied in, to the story.

I read them both per book if they are there and decide how interesting they are. But for me neither really affect the rating and may or may not be mentioned in review.

Epilogues, yes!
(I'm one of few words.)"
Ditto.
(Not Ditto)

I like prologues, although, some books don't have them. The prologue has to be a catcher to me, fill with tension. As for epilogues, if I love the hero and his heroine - I want to know what they are doing in the future.
I'm forever thinking about what's going on in Sam and Alyssa life. I could read about them forever, as long as the story is good.
I'm forever thinking about what's going on in Sam and Alyssa life. I could read about them forever, as long as the story is good.

As for the epilogue, I can't think of a book without them. They tend to be that sweet final chapter that wraps everything up in a secure bow that others have mentioned enjoying on this thread :)
Natalie wrote: "Do you like having a prologue or epilogue in a book?
I recently read an article about prologues which claimed that many people don't like them and even would go as far as not reading a book which ..."
I like both. I think they can be a good lead-in and conclusion to the story. When they aren't there, I miss them, especially the epilogue. Especially if the story ends abruptly. I don't think they should be there if they don't add anything to the story.
I recently read an article about prologues which claimed that many people don't like them and even would go as far as not reading a book which ..."
I like both. I think they can be a good lead-in and conclusion to the story. When they aren't there, I miss them, especially the epilogue. Especially if the story ends abruptly. I don't think they should be there if they don't add anything to the story.
Mary23nm wrote: "I read a lot of historical romance, so prologues and epilogues are very common. I can't imagine deciding not to read a book where there is a prologue. It is often necessary to get a glimpse of the ..."
I agree. I don't care much for HFN either.
I agree. I don't care much for HFN either.

I'll try and get my opinions on this posted up over the next few days.

A good prologue I find sets the scene and gives snippets of info.
I really like Kresley Coles prologues, I also find enjoyable her technique of opening her first chapters with a quote from her main characters.
I have read also read some very satisfying epilogues. With a good epilogue I love reading and discovering about the characters lives further in into the future, for example.
I don't find I am put off by an author choosing to write a prologue or epilogue for their book.
I recently read an article about prologues which claimed that many people don't like them and even would go as far as not reading a book which opened with a prologue!
So what are your own views? What are books you've read with with good examples?
Are some genres more suited to having a prologue or an epilogue than others?