The Readers discussion
Episode Discussions
>
Ep 155 The Sympathizer
date
newest »



I just got the book today . I am so happy we are reading that one . I am reading along with audible with whyspersync ! I love to read that way to write reviews for my blog and other freelancing . I wanted to read this when it won the Pulitzer . I was just to bogged down with other good stuff.
So , Joy! Joy! Here we are...
Dawn

Apart from some creepy inter-species masturbation stuff early on which goes nowhere, I had a bunch of problems with the novel.
Ironically, given Nguyen's confirmation that he supports a cultural boycott of my country, I felt some sympathy with the narrator for smuggling a copy of the book back here from London.
In defiance of the boycott, I shall lend my copy to as many people as possible, but it won't be with a terribly strong recommendation, sadly.


Am I glad I read it? Absolutely.
Here's why
http://novelgobblers.com/the-sympathi...

PLEASE no one post spoilers for any visitors that may stumble onto the thread.
If you have specific topics/questions/comments for the discussion Simon and I will have on the podcast please direct message one of us or email Simon.




This book brought up so many relevant issues happening today I almost forgot it is supposed to be relating a time long past.
Can't wait to hear what you guys thought of it.
(and yes, I'm aware I'm late finishing it.... Took me a bit longer to get into initially.)

Sincerely ,
Dawn


I wanted to point out that the author is on the longlist for the National Book Award in the non-fiction category for his memoir about growing up in Vietnam. I am hoping to read it alongside the novel just to bring more to the conversation, but I may or may not meet the 21st deadline. :)
That book is Nothing Ever Dies: Vietnam and the Memory of War.

The author has written this off as a function of his narrator's characters as a poor man's James Bond, but I'm not sure I buy it.
http://lithub.com/talking-to-pulitzer...

I've emailed some thoughts via gmail.
My review is here too:
https://booksonthegonet.wordpress.com...


Question:
I'm still working my way through The Sympathizer and I'm enjoying it thoroughly, but it's the message that the book is conveying (or that I think it is) which is really hitting home. My question is; did you write this knowing that societies issues of representation and acceptance are such important talking points at the moment? Was this your way of using past events to illustrate current struggles? Or am I way off?
Answer:
thanks for the question, Robin. I'm a scholar, and issues of representation and acceptance are critical in my work. Things haven't changed that much from the 1960s and 1970s when it comes to how "differences" and minorities, or others, are represented or accepted (or not) by dominant society. So I could write about the past and be aware that those events could comment on the present.

My book club is discussing it tomorrow night. I'm really looking forward to hearing their reaction. How did your discussion go?

But now that it's been percolating, I've decided that I hate it. I think it was a brutal thug of a book.
Really looking forward to hearing what Simon and Thomas think of it.

..."
Most people felt it was one of the better books they'd read. Many of them are of the age where they were aware of the news, etc, during the Vietnam war (I'm a few decades younger!) and felt it was in their face but made them think. We talking about "nothing," the Sonny issue and the NpR interview with the author (Fresh Air, quite good at providing some context).
While the last 100 pages are brutal, they had some parallels to me with dystopian novels like We or 1984, where the mindf*cking is all in the name of getting a person to give in, at last, to their way of thinking.
To me the writing of the first 100 and the final 3 pages is the most memorable. I'm not as interested in the representation in film side story, but his non-fiction book is EVEN more saturated with it; I did a little digging and found even his dissertation was about Asian American representation.
I appreciate his ongoing assertion that he is a refugee, not an immigrant. That his life (and the fictional characters' lives) has been altered forever by war, etc. We like to point out the "American" dream and dismiss the conflict if someone has found success, but they never would have had to. I appreciated this stark reality and my book club talked at length about this, because we have a refugee in our group, who escaped from East Berlin in the 1950s. We also have several expatriates from other places. So there was a lot for them to identify with.

We will get to it sooner or later!

Gives you so much to think about with a book with so much meat to it.

..."
Most people felt it was one of the better books t..."
Thank you for the recap! It definitely is a novel that invites discussion. I've enjoyed listening to the author's interview on NPR and elsewhere. I've been think about reading his non-fiction book too. I'm waiting for it to come in at the library. Unfortunately, my book club had to postpone the discussion. Half the members could not make the meeting so we'll discuss at a later date. Maybe I'll have time to read Nothing Every Dies before we next meet.

Also, that squid scene left me speechless. Not usually a prude but that was a bit much for me!

this discussion i posted before (https://soundcloud.com/uscbedrosian/t...) tackles the issue of representation of women.

My favorite part was Nguyen's writing style. He's got that Nabokovian delight in running like mad with themes and word play that really makes it fun to read (though at times I wondered if it was too clever or too aware of what it was trying to do). I really liked the final 100 pages because of how effectively the narrative seems to fall apart due to the considerable distress of the main character.
The movie filming was my least favorite part--probably because satire isn't my favorite genre, and this seemed to have the most over-the-top satirical jabs. But overall, the book struck enough notes in terms of both sheer entertainment and interesting musings on culture, identity, and historical narratives to recommend it. Looking forward to hearing the discussion!


Once you come into our Country in America as a political Refugee , we set you up with money , a home, a job , food, clothing, health care , etc... all on the taxpayers of our country . Once this happens , these refugees must acclimate as citizen of the USA . They are told they can never go home unless they establish this citizenship and want to visit and return once war is long over . While war is going on , no way they can return to their home . Most are considered traitors and are banned at the collapse of a government anyway. Just as we see in The sympathizer , no one will return home .
In the case of Syrian refugees right now , or Cuban refugees, etc... they can't go home or they will be killed. The Mexican refugees will be returned but most in Mexico are never known to be missing until they return . I have never thought about what Mexico does with their people who are returned . I feel I must know now . I also think that it must not be much for them to keep going back and forth . Mexico does not monitor their border as we do .
This is the next question I want to know. I also wonder if The Sympathizer would have been so popular a book this year if we had not been dealing with so many immigrants and refugees . Then again , literature has always been a reflection of the historic period of our time . So, here we are !
Dawn

Don't you think that was worth shouting about?

Don't you think that was worth shouting about?"
WAHOOOOOO
You have until the first Monday in September to read it and send us your questions/comments. You can write something or send us an MP3 file. If you do intend to send an MP3 file contact Simon on The Readers blog email and he will let you know how to do that.