The GoodBook Club discussion
Book Discussions
>
We're All In This Together Discussion
message 1:
by
Penguin Random House Canada
(new)
Aug 19, 2016 06:09AM

reply
|
flag

Parker family - Dysfunctional, with regular modern day issues (choosing between work and family, marital problems) thrown in to make the story more relatable.


I'm not usually a fan of multi storyline books but this one worked for me.
I read it on an e-reader and the legend to the different symbols (and who they represent) was at the end which I found silly. It didn't take me very long to work out who was which symbol but it would have been even better to have the info up front.


A lot of the book was Finn trying to get things back to normal, but I think, and Nicki at one point comes out and says it, dysfunctional IS normal for the family. While that does make them more relatable (every family has some dysfunction) I almost felt like at some points, it was a bit much and exaggerated. Every single character had a problem that just had to be solved at the same time, or at least that's how it felt to me.



I've now started ready about another dysfunctional family in The Nest. Hope it's just as good but so far there problems are not really relatable as they were in We're all in this together.
Once again great job penguin random house for the book club pick. Can't wait to see what the surprise participation gift is this month and also to find out what next month's book club pick is.




I think that the Parker family was dysfunctional, but given the circumstances that they were all faced with it was understandable. Most families will go through turmoil and rough patches at some point in time and everyone handles things differently. I think this was evident in the way the different family members dealt with their issues i.e Katrina, Finn, Nikki, Walter,.
I think Kate's incident brought the family closer together because even though it was dysfunctional, everyone rallied together and was there to support one another not only with the Parker family crisis as a whole, but for their own individual crisis' as well.
There's still plenty of time, Chantale!
SO glad everyone is enjoying it. The book definitely has a lot going for it.
With so many complex characters in the novel, which one stood out to you the most?
SO glad everyone is enjoying it. The book definitely has a lot going for it.
With so many complex characters in the novel, which one stood out to you the most?



It started off grabbing my attention right away. The mixed up family, the drama put on them by their mother Kate's stunt, the media grabbing this story, I wanted to keep reading.
Half way through, I found the author kept adding in new characters that I did not care about and thought it should have kept to the true core of the family.
It also became unbelievable, that everyone person in this family had an extreme issue, they lacked communication, it just seemed to far fetch. Everyone deals with work, marriage, kids, some sort of turmoil in their lives but this family seemed to have everything at once. Kate character was the best and so true for someone with dementia.

I think that she leaves us with a functional family - "dysfunction" seems to be a trait most families share in one way or another. There is movement in this book towards a larger understanding of the world and the family as a whole by the end. There is no pat answer, but interesting questions that resonate.
I also valued her depiction of Thunder Bay. It really came alive.

As for which one is standing out for me the most, at this time it is Katriina with her underlying anxiety, lack of self-confidence and overwhelming desire for improvement.

With so many complex characters in the novel, which one stood out to you the..."
Kristiina is my standout character as well. I was really excited whenever I saw the next chapter was marked with a house and therefore was going to be about her. I could read a whole book about her character I think.



I like the start and am intrigued to find out more about this family. There are so many questions running through my head already:
1. Why did Finn leave? That incident on the patio doesn't seem like the complete story; more like a "straw that broke the camel's back".
2. Why did Kate take Shawn in? Seems like quite a chance to take with young children in the house and a husband that isn't home a lot.
3. Why is Katriina so insecure?
These are just starters. I'm not looking for answers; I'll find out as I read. I'm really looking forward to the coming week and reading this story to find out the answers.
I like the writing style as well. It's humorous, yet has an element of sadness as well.
Looking forward to the coming few days and making good progress on this book.



All families are dysfunctional to a certain extent, but this was a really unique situation and it didn't feel silly or overdone.
I'm not far into this book yet but am absolutely loving it so far. I have a hunch this is going to be one of my favourites -- I'm a sucker for books with vivid characters and dysfunctional families.


One of the things I really liked is how the books seems to focus on Finn, but really use her as an entryway for the reader, an outsider member of the family coming back to it to introduce the complete outsider the reader is. Then you meet all those other characters and you already care about them somehow.
Kate's parts were the most vivid and fascinating to read, although I personally related a lot more with Finn and Katriina, but to each his own. Kate made me feel sad, reminding me of my own grandmother who's slowly losing her grip on reality. I also loved London, who acts exactly like a teenaged girl does, even though she's self-conscious about it.
A really great read, Can't wait to see what's coming next month.

I'm only about 15% into the story (Saturday) and I would say that yes, they are a dysfunctional family. Twins are usually close so I'm a bit surprised at the hostile relationship between Finn and Nicki (whom I really dislike). Personally if I was in Finn's shoes I would have stayed away as well.

The more Katriina is mentioned, the less I like her and the more irritating I find her. She just seems to get deeper and deeper into bad situations and thought lines without trying to help herself in any way. She doesn't give thought to why she's feeling as she is, how to change her situation or what is truly happening to her.
These situations happen slowly, with the "victim" not realizing the subtle changes in one's life & situation. However, in Katriina's case, she is realizing that things are escalating in her inner turmoil, her thoughts aren't logical, her actions insane......and for what purpose? To have people like her? None of her actions will entice people to like and/or accept her; just the opposite.
I hope she starts to get things together. At the moment, I find her irritating. She's a sad case but one that I feel could help herself more than she is.
I'm enjoying this story. The flow is good, the characters interesting and their situations intriguing.
Walter is so removed. He seems to have always been like that. He cares, he's involved but only in an observational way (he doesn't seem to interact), he loves but I wonder if anyone knows that.
What we don't know (at least not yet) is Walter & Kate's upbringing. What made them that way they are? Walter observing, Kate acting (out?). Whatever baggage they had/have they seem to have brought to their kids.

So far, Katriina is the one who's standing out the most to me. There's something about the elastic band snapping and the repeated "be a better mother/daughter-in-law" thing that affected me. She's holding herself to such a lofty standard, and I know it can't possibly end well.
Also... Can I say that Thunder Bay really stands out to me as a character? I've never been, but I do live in Northern Ontario, and there's so much that feels familiar in the descriptions and cultural references. There's such a vivid sense of place. And I think that Thunder Bay, its influence on the characters, and how they perceive their feelings towards the city... it's more than just a background onto which the story is set or an atmosphere.
Also... Can I say that Thunder Bay really stands out to me as a character? I've never been, but I do live in Northern Ontario, and there's so much that feels familiar in the descriptions and cultural references. There's such a vivid sense of place. And I think that Thunder Bay, its influence on the characters, and how they perceive their feelings towards the city... it's more than just a background onto which the story is set or an atmosphere.

Truly dysfunctional with some mental illness thrown in.



I'm just at Chapter 15 but this thought keeps running through my head, too.
Kate was having problems, some of which the family noticed. Yet no one did anything or reacted to it in any way. It seems odd.

This whole book just goes to show how complex people are and how families can be brought together and become stronger through tragedies, even while everyone is expecting them to break apart. I'm going to read anything and everything Amy Jones writes. She has an amazing perspective of the world.
With people not acting on Kate's symptoms... I buy it, probably because my extended family did something very similar -- noticing but ignoring years of dementia symptoms until things got out of control.
I think it's a combination of denial, communication issues, resentment, exhaustion, and a sense of not wanting to embarass the person by acknowledging that something's wrong. The Parkers seem to have all of that in spades, and I see how that could get away from people and lead to a crisis.
So, I don't know, I get it. Not sure what that says about me, but hey. ;)
I think it's a combination of denial, communication issues, resentment, exhaustion, and a sense of not wanting to embarass the person by acknowledging that something's wrong. The Parkers seem to have all of that in spades, and I see how that could get away from people and lead to a crisis.
So, I don't know, I get it. Not sure what that says about me, but hey. ;)

Sarah, I think I get that. The further I get in the book and the more we get to know about the family, the more I realize that they hide from the important things. They've spent lifetimes knowing that "something" wasn't right and not talking about it or facing it. Kate's situation would have just been another "something".


I agree with you that the author develops the characters really well. I just finished a book that was written in the same way, with each chapter from a different point of view, and the characters were all so different and far-fetched sometimes that I had troubles following the story. But these characters feel very real, and their points of view each add a layer to the story that made it all come together very logically at the end.

I think that was one of the most realistic parts of the book. When living with the one you love, it's hard to want to admit she has a disease and is getting worse. It also seems the husband never had great communication with the kids, was afraid of confrontation and preferred to just let things be.


I don't know. I can't imagine a family who knows the mother/grandmother has dementia, and who has been known to get lost and confused, would allow her to drive and do whatever she wants, whenever she wants. That's irresponsible.

Hey everyone! I'm so glad to hear all the responses to We're All in this Together! Sounds like you're all enjoying it!
Do you feel that the characters tried to keep things from one another, such as Walter keeping the incident with Kate hushed up, or do you think that the issues were in plain sight and they willfully ignored them?
Do you feel that the characters tried to keep things from one another, such as Walter keeping the incident with Kate hushed up, or do you think that the issues were in plain sight and they willfully ignored them?